%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : SYN291-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:09:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   13 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_117,axiom,
    ( q1(d,d,d)
    | ~ k0(e)
    | ~ s0(d) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_117) ).

cnf(axiom_1,axiom,
    s0(d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_1) ).

cnf(axiom_28,axiom,
    k0(e),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_28) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ q1(d,X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    ( q1(d,d,d)
    | ~ k0(e)
    | ~ s0(d) ),
    rule_117 ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    s0(d),
    axiom_1 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    k0(e),
    axiom_28 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ q1(d,X1,X2),
    prove_this ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : SYN291-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 14:06:43 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.39  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.39  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.20/0.39  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.20/0.39  #
% 0.20/0.39  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.39  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.39  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.39  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------