TSTP Solution File: SYN285-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SYN285-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3rYwxGh376 true

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 04:02:31 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.89s
% Output   : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN285-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3rYwxGh376 true
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 18:01:22 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.12/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.12/0.34  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.12/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.68  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.68  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.68  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.59/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.59/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.59/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.59/0.81  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/0.89  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.60/0.89  % BCE start: 369
% 0.60/0.89  % BCE eliminated: 40
% 0.60/0.89  % PE start: 329
% 0.60/0.89  logic: neq
% 0.60/0.89  % PE eliminated: -6
% 0.60/0.89  % done 401 iterations in 0.166s
% 0.60/0.89  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.60/0.89  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.60/0.89  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(k0_type, type, k0: $i > $o).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(q0_type, type, q0: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(k1_type, type, k1: $i > $o).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(p0_type, type, p0: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(q1_type, type, q1: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(l0_type, type, l0: $i > $o).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(e_type, type, e: $i).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(n0_type, type, n0: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(prove_this, conjecture, (q1 @ a @ d @ d)).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( q1 @ a @ d @ d )),
% 0.60/0.89    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl368, plain, (~ (q1 @ a @ d @ d)),
% 0.60/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(axiom_17, axiom, (q0 @ X @ d)).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (q0 @ X0 @ d)),
% 0.60/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_17])).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(axiom_14, axiom, (p0 @ b @ X)).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (p0 @ b @ X0)),
% 0.60/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_14])).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(rule_109, axiom,
% 0.60/0.89    (( q1 @ E @ E @ F ) | ( ~( p0 @ G @ G ) ) | ( ~( q0 @ F @ E ) ) | 
% 0.60/0.89     ( ~( k1 @ E ) ))).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl146, plain,
% 0.60/0.89      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.89         ( (q1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X1)
% 0.60/0.89          | ~ (p0 @ X2 @ X2)
% 0.60/0.89          | ~ (q0 @ X1 @ X0)
% 0.60/0.89          | ~ (k1 @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_109])).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl1222, plain,
% 0.60/0.89      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.89         ( (q1 @ X1 @ X1 @ X0) | ~ (q0 @ X0 @ X1) | ~ (k1 @ X1))),
% 0.60/0.89      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl146])).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl1244, plain,
% 0.60/0.89      (![X0 : $i]: ( (q1 @ d @ d @ X0) | ~ (k1 @ d))),
% 0.60/0.89      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl16, zip_derived_cl1222])).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(axiom_34, axiom, (n0 @ c @ d)).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain, ( (n0 @ c @ d)),
% 0.60/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_34])).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(rule_001, axiom, (( k1 @ I ) | ( ~( n0 @ J @ I ) ))).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl38, plain,
% 0.60/0.89      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (k1 @ X0) | ~ (n0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_001])).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl709, plain, ( (k1 @ d)),
% 0.60/0.89      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl33, zip_derived_cl38])).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl1250, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (q1 @ d @ d @ X0)),
% 0.60/0.89      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1244, zip_derived_cl709])).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(rule_099, axiom,
% 0.60/0.89    (( q1 @ E @ F @ F ) | ( ~( k0 @ G ) ) | ( ~( l0 @ E ) ) | 
% 0.60/0.89     ( ~( q1 @ F @ F @ G ) ))).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl136, plain,
% 0.60/0.89      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.89         ( (q1 @ X0 @ X1 @ X1)
% 0.60/0.89          | ~ (k0 @ X2)
% 0.60/0.89          | ~ (l0 @ X0)
% 0.60/0.89          | ~ (q1 @ X1 @ X1 @ X2))),
% 0.60/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_099])).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl1268, plain,
% 0.60/0.89      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (q1 @ X1 @ d @ d) | ~ (k0 @ X0) | ~ (l0 @ X1))),
% 0.60/0.89      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)],
% 0.60/0.89                [zip_derived_cl1250, zip_derived_cl136])).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(axiom_28, axiom, (k0 @ e)).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain, ( (k0 @ e)),
% 0.60/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_28])).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl1279, plain,
% 0.60/0.89      (![X0 : $i]: (~ (l0 @ X0) |  (q1 @ X0 @ d @ d))),
% 0.60/0.89      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1268, zip_derived_cl27])).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(axiom_20, axiom, (l0 @ a)).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain, ( (l0 @ a)),
% 0.60/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_20])).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl1288, plain, ( (q1 @ a @ d @ d)),
% 0.60/0.89      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1279, zip_derived_cl19])).
% 0.60/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl1292, plain, ($false),
% 0.60/0.89      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl368, zip_derived_cl1288])).
% 0.60/0.89  
% 0.60/0.89  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.60/0.89  
% 0.60/0.89  
% 0.60/0.89  % Terminating...
% 0.63/0.96  % Runner terminated.
% 1.66/0.98  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------