TSTP Solution File: SYN278-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN278-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:14:16 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 8 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_107,axiom,
( q1(e,X1,X1)
| ~ m0(X1,d,X1)
| ~ m0(e,d,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yFP28DTlra/E---3.1_4038.p',rule_107) ).
cnf(axiom_19,axiom,
m0(X1,d,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yFP28DTlra/E---3.1_4038.p',axiom_19) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ q1(X1,X2,e),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yFP28DTlra/E---3.1_4038.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
( q1(e,X1,X1)
| ~ m0(X1,d,X1)
| ~ m0(e,d,X1) ),
rule_107 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
m0(X1,d,X2),
axiom_19 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ q1(X1,X2,e),
prove_this ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
q1(e,X1,X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_4])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.14 % Problem : SYN278-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.11/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:30:14 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yFP28DTlra/E---3.1_4038.p
% 0.22/0.54 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # new_bool_3 with pid 4119 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.54 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 4122 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.54 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.54
% 0.22/0.54 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.54 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.54 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.54 # Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.22/0.54 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 160
% 0.22/0.54 # Initial clauses : 209
% 0.22/0.54 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.22/0.54 # Initial clauses in saturation : 204
% 0.22/0.54 # Processed clauses : 234
% 0.22/0.54 # ...of these trivial : 5
% 0.22/0.54 # ...subsumed : 17
% 0.22/0.54 # ...remaining for further processing : 212
% 0.22/0.54 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.22/0.54 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.22/0.54 # Generated clauses : 6
% 0.22/0.54 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.22/0.54 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.22/0.54 # Paramodulations : 6
% 0.22/0.54 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Total rewrite steps : 60
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of processed clauses : 30
% 0.22/0.54 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 27
% 0.22/0.54 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.22/0.54 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 149
% 0.22/0.54 # ...number of literals in the above : 391
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of archived clauses : 182
% 0.22/0.54 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6379
% 0.22/0.54 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4587
% 0.22/0.54 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 18
% 0.22/0.54 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.22/0.54 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 0.22/0.54 # BW rewrite match successes : 5
% 0.22/0.54 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6449
% 0.22/0.54
% 0.22/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54 # User time : 0.019 s
% 0.22/0.54 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 2300 pages
% 0.22/0.54
% 0.22/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54 # User time : 0.026 s
% 0.22/0.54 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 1996 pages
% 0.22/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.55 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------