TSTP Solution File: SYN273-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SYN273-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ynMlFJLud0 true
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 04:02:28 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.39s 1.07s
% Output : Refutation 1.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN273-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ynMlFJLud0 true
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 18:28:32 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.62 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.62 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.62 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.21/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.21/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.21/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.38/0.84 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 1.39/1.07 % Solved by fo/fo7.sh.
% 1.39/1.07 % done 799 iterations in 0.256s
% 1.39/1.07 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.39/1.07 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.39/1.07 thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 1.39/1.07 thf(k0_type, type, k0: $i > $o).
% 1.39/1.07 thf(m0_type, type, m0: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.39/1.07 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 1.39/1.07 thf(k1_type, type, k1: $i > $o).
% 1.39/1.07 thf(k3_type, type, k3: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.39/1.07 thf(q1_type, type, q1: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.39/1.07 thf(l0_type, type, l0: $i > $o).
% 1.39/1.07 thf(e_type, type, e: $i).
% 1.39/1.07 thf(m1_type, type, m1: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.39/1.07 thf(k2_type, type, k2: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.39/1.07 thf(n0_type, type, n0: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.39/1.07 thf(p4_type, type, p4: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.39/1.07 thf(axiom_19, axiom, (m0 @ X @ d @ Y)).
% 1.39/1.07 thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain, (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: (m0 @ X0 @ d @ X1)),
% 1.39/1.07 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_19])).
% 1.39/1.07 thf(rule_110, axiom, (( q1 @ B @ B @ B ) | ( ~( m0 @ C @ D @ B ) ))).
% 1.39/1.07 thf(zip_derived_cl147, plain,
% 1.39/1.07 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.39/1.07 ( (q1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (m0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X0))),
% 1.39/1.07 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_110])).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl467, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (q1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 1.39/1.08 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl147])).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(rule_129, axiom, (( k2 @ J @ J ) | ( ~( q1 @ A @ J @ J ) ))).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl166, plain,
% 1.39/1.08 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (k2 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (q1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X0))),
% 1.39/1.08 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_129])).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl530, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (k2 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 1.39/1.08 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl467, zip_derived_cl166])).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(rule_021, axiom,
% 1.39/1.08 (( m1 @ I @ J @ I ) | ( ~( l0 @ I ) ) | ( ~( k0 @ J ) ))).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl58, plain,
% 1.39/1.08 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (m1 @ X0 @ X1 @ X0) | ~ (l0 @ X0) | ~ (k0 @ X1))),
% 1.39/1.08 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_021])).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(rule_127, axiom,
% 1.39/1.08 (( k2 @ C @ D ) | ( ~( m1 @ E @ D @ C ) ) | ( ~( k1 @ F ) ) |
% 1.39/1.08 ( ~( k2 @ F @ D ) ))).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl164, plain,
% 1.39/1.08 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.39/1.08 ( (k2 @ X0 @ X1)
% 1.39/1.08 | ~ (m1 @ X2 @ X1 @ X0)
% 1.39/1.08 | ~ (k1 @ X3)
% 1.39/1.08 | ~ (k2 @ X3 @ X1))),
% 1.39/1.08 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_127])).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl863, plain,
% 1.39/1.08 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.39/1.08 (~ (k0 @ X1)
% 1.39/1.08 | ~ (l0 @ X0)
% 1.39/1.08 | ~ (k2 @ X2 @ X1)
% 1.39/1.08 | ~ (k1 @ X2)
% 1.39/1.08 | (k2 @ X0 @ X1))),
% 1.39/1.08 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl58, zip_derived_cl164])).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl881, plain,
% 1.39/1.08 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.39/1.08 ( (k2 @ X1 @ X0) | ~ (k1 @ X0) | ~ (l0 @ X1) | ~ (k0 @ X0))),
% 1.39/1.08 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl530, zip_derived_cl863])).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(rule_194, axiom, (( k3 @ F @ F @ G ) | ( ~( k2 @ G @ F ) ))).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl229, plain,
% 1.39/1.08 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (k3 @ X0 @ X0 @ X1) | ~ (k2 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.39/1.08 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_194])).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(rule_287, axiom, (( p4 @ B @ C @ B ) | ( ~( k3 @ B @ B @ C ) ))).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl318, plain,
% 1.39/1.08 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (p4 @ X0 @ X1 @ X0) | ~ (k3 @ X0 @ X0 @ X1))),
% 1.39/1.08 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_287])).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(prove_this, conjecture, (p4 @ e @ c @ e)).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( p4 @ e @ c @ e )),
% 1.39/1.08 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl346, plain, (~ (p4 @ e @ c @ e)),
% 1.39/1.08 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl985, plain, (~ (k3 @ e @ e @ c)),
% 1.39/1.08 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl318, zip_derived_cl346])).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl1022, plain, (~ (k2 @ c @ e)),
% 1.39/1.08 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl229, zip_derived_cl985])).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl1542, plain, ((~ (k0 @ e) | ~ (l0 @ c) | ~ (k1 @ e))),
% 1.39/1.08 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl881, zip_derived_cl1022])).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(axiom_28, axiom, (k0 @ e)).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain, ( (k0 @ e)),
% 1.39/1.08 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_28])).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(axiom_24, axiom, (l0 @ c)).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl23, plain, ( (l0 @ c)),
% 1.39/1.08 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_24])).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(axiom_3, axiom, (n0 @ d @ e)).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain, ( (n0 @ d @ e)),
% 1.39/1.08 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_3])).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(rule_001, axiom, (( k1 @ I ) | ( ~( n0 @ J @ I ) ))).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl38, plain,
% 1.39/1.08 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (k1 @ X0) | ~ (n0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.39/1.08 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_001])).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl348, plain, ( (k1 @ e)),
% 1.39/1.08 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl38])).
% 1.39/1.08 thf(zip_derived_cl1546, plain, ($false),
% 1.39/1.08 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 1.39/1.08 [zip_derived_cl1542, zip_derived_cl27, zip_derived_cl23,
% 1.39/1.08 zip_derived_cl348])).
% 1.39/1.08
% 1.39/1.08 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.39/1.08
% 1.39/1.08
% 1.39/1.08 % Terminating...
% 1.96/1.17 % Runner terminated.
% 2.14/1.18 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------