TSTP Solution File: SYN267-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SYN267-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:14:14 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.38s 0.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   16 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;  16 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   24 (   0 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   7 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_001,axiom,
    ( k1(X1)
    | ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.51HH44SCJP/E---3.1_20505.p',rule_001) ).

cnf(axiom_26,axiom,
    n0(d,c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.51HH44SCJP/E---3.1_20505.p',axiom_26) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p4(X1,X2,c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.51HH44SCJP/E---3.1_20505.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(rule_287,axiom,
    ( p4(X1,X2,X1)
    | ~ k3(X1,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.51HH44SCJP/E---3.1_20505.p',rule_287) ).

cnf(rule_159,axiom,
    ( p2(X1,X1,X1)
    | ~ k1(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.51HH44SCJP/E---3.1_20505.p',rule_159) ).

cnf(rule_206,axiom,
    ( k3(X1,X2,X1)
    | ~ p2(X2,X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.51HH44SCJP/E---3.1_20505.p',rule_206) ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    ( k1(X1)
    | ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
    rule_001 ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    n0(d,c),
    axiom_26 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p4(X1,X2,c),
    prove_this ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    ( p4(X1,X2,X1)
    | ~ k3(X1,X1,X2) ),
    rule_287 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    ( p2(X1,X1,X1)
    | ~ k1(X1) ),
    rule_159 ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    k1(c),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ k3(c,c,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    ( k3(X1,X2,X1)
    | ~ p2(X2,X1,X1) ),
    rule_206 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    p2(c,c,c),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.15  % Problem    : SYN267-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.07/0.16  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.38  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.38  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.38  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.38  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.16/0.38  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.38  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 18:06:08 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.38  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.38/0.55  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.38/0.55  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.51HH44SCJP/E---3.1_20505.p
% 0.38/0.60  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.38/0.60  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.60  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.60  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/0.60  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.60  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.60  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.60  # new_bool_3 with pid 20653 completed with status 0
% 0.38/0.60  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.38/0.60  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.60  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.60  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/0.60  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.60  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.38/0.60  # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.38/0.60  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.38/0.60  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.60  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 20663 completed with status 0
% 0.38/0.60  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.38/0.60  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.60  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.61  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/0.61  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.61  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.38/0.61  # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.38/0.61  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.38/0.61  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.61  # Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 0.38/0.61  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.38/0.61  
% 0.38/0.61  # Proof found!
% 0.38/0.61  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.38/0.61  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.38/0.61  # Parsed axioms                        : 369
% 0.38/0.61  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 39
% 0.38/0.61  # Initial clauses                      : 330
% 0.38/0.61  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 6
% 0.38/0.61  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 324
% 0.38/0.61  # Processed clauses                    : 460
% 0.38/0.61  # ...of these trivial                  : 14
% 0.38/0.61  # ...subsumed                          : 24
% 0.38/0.61  # ...remaining for further processing  : 422
% 0.38/0.61  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.38/0.61  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.38/0.61  # Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.38/0.61  # Backward-rewritten                   : 20
% 0.38/0.61  # Generated clauses                    : 73
% 0.38/0.61  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 70
% 0.38/0.61  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.38/0.61  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.38/0.61  # Paramodulations                      : 73
% 0.38/0.61  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.38/0.61  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.38/0.61  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.38/0.61  # Total rewrite steps                  : 103
% 0.38/0.61  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.38/0.61  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.38/0.61  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.38/0.61  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.38/0.61  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.38/0.61  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.38/0.61  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.38/0.61  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.38/0.61  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.38/0.61  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.38/0.61  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.38/0.61  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.38/0.61  # Current number of processed clauses  : 110
% 0.38/0.61  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 60
% 0.38/0.61  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.38/0.61  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.38/0.61  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 48
% 0.38/0.61  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 220
% 0.38/0.61  # ...number of literals in the above   : 653
% 0.38/0.61  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.38/0.61  # Current number of archived clauses   : 312
% 0.38/0.61  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 18610
% 0.38/0.61  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12198
% 0.38/0.61  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 27
% 0.38/0.61  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 111
% 0.38/0.61  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.38/0.61  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 25
% 0.38/0.61  # BW rewrite match successes           : 18
% 0.38/0.61  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.38/0.61  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.38/0.61  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9341
% 0.38/0.61  
% 0.38/0.61  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.38/0.61  # User time                : 0.032 s
% 0.38/0.61  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.38/0.61  # Total time               : 0.040 s
% 0.38/0.61  # Maximum resident set size: 2476 pages
% 0.38/0.61  
% 0.38/0.61  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.38/0.61  # User time                : 0.038 s
% 0.38/0.61  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.38/0.61  # Total time               : 0.049 s
% 0.38/0.61  # Maximum resident set size: 2000 pages
% 0.38/0.61  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.38/0.61  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------