TSTP Solution File: SYN266-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SYN266-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WatUMsaokU true
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 04:02:26 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.17s 0.98s
% Output : Refutation 2.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SYN266-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WatUMsaokU true
% 0.17/0.35 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 20:10:32 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.36 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.17/0.36 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.36 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.17/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.17/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.22/0.64 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.22/0.64 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.22/0.64 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.22/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.22/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.22/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.22/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.57/0.86 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 2.17/0.98 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 2.17/0.98 % BCE start: 369
% 2.17/0.98 % BCE eliminated: 40
% 2.17/0.98 % PE start: 329
% 2.17/0.98 logic: neq
% 2.17/0.98 % PE eliminated: -6
% 2.17/0.98 % done 595 iterations in 0.245s
% 2.17/0.98 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 2.17/0.98 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.17/0.98 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(s0_type, type, s0: $i > $o).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(m0_type, type, m0: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(k1_type, type, k1: $i > $o).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(p0_type, type, p0: $i > $i > $o).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(e_type, type, e: $i).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(m1_type, type, m1: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(p3_type, type, p3: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(m3_type, type, m3: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(n0_type, type, n0: $i > $i > $o).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(p2_type, type, p2: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(rule_238, axiom, (( m3 @ I @ I @ I ) | ( ~( p2 @ I @ I @ I ) ))).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(zip_derived_cl275, plain,
% 2.17/0.98 (![X0 : $i]: ( (m3 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (p2 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0))),
% 2.17/0.98 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_238])).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(axiom_19, axiom, (m0 @ X @ d @ Y)).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain, (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: (m0 @ X0 @ d @ X1)),
% 2.17/0.98 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_19])).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(rule_006, axiom, (( m1 @ J @ J @ J ) | ( ~( m0 @ A @ A @ J ) ))).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(zip_derived_cl43, plain,
% 2.17/0.98 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (m1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (m0 @ X1 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 2.17/0.98 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_006])).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(zip_derived_cl741, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (m1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 2.17/0.98 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl43])).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(rule_150, axiom, (( p2 @ F @ F @ F ) | ( ~( m1 @ G @ G @ F ) ))).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(zip_derived_cl187, plain,
% 2.17/0.98 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (p2 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (m1 @ X1 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 2.17/0.98 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_150])).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(zip_derived_cl1148, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (p2 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 2.17/0.98 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl741, zip_derived_cl187])).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(zip_derived_cl1153, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (m3 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 2.17/0.98 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl275, zip_derived_cl1148])).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(rule_251, axiom,
% 2.17/0.98 (( p3 @ A @ B @ B ) | ( ~( m3 @ B @ C @ D ) ) | ( ~( p2 @ A @ B @ D ) ))).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(zip_derived_cl288, plain,
% 2.17/0.98 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 2.17/0.98 ( (p3 @ X0 @ X1 @ X1) | ~ (m3 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3) | ~ (p2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X3))),
% 2.17/0.98 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_251])).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(zip_derived_cl1611, plain,
% 2.17/0.98 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (p3 @ X1 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (p2 @ X1 @ X0 @ X0))),
% 2.17/0.98 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)],
% 2.17/0.98 [zip_derived_cl1153, zip_derived_cl288])).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(prove_this, conjecture, (p3 @ b @ e @ e)).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( p3 @ b @ e @ e )),
% 2.17/0.98 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(zip_derived_cl368, plain, (~ (p3 @ b @ e @ e)),
% 2.17/0.98 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(zip_derived_cl1614, plain, (~ (p2 @ b @ e @ e)),
% 2.17/0.98 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)],
% 2.17/0.98 [zip_derived_cl1611, zip_derived_cl368])).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(axiom_14, axiom, (p0 @ b @ X)).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (p0 @ b @ X0)),
% 2.17/0.98 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_14])).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(rule_029, axiom,
% 2.17/0.98 (( m1 @ H @ I @ H ) | ( ~( p0 @ H @ I ) ) | ( ~( s0 @ H ) ))).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(zip_derived_cl66, plain,
% 2.17/0.98 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.17/0.98 ( (m1 @ X0 @ X1 @ X0) | ~ (p0 @ X0 @ X1) | ~ (s0 @ X0))),
% 2.17/0.98 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_029])).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(zip_derived_cl832, plain,
% 2.17/0.98 (![X0 : $i]: ( (m1 @ b @ X0 @ b) | ~ (s0 @ b))),
% 2.17/0.98 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl66])).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(axiom_5, axiom, (s0 @ b)).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, ( (s0 @ b)),
% 2.17/0.98 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_5])).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(zip_derived_cl834, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (m1 @ b @ X0 @ b)),
% 2.17/0.98 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl832, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(rule_176, axiom, (( p2 @ D @ E @ D ) | ( ~( m1 @ E @ D @ E ) ))).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(zip_derived_cl213, plain,
% 2.17/0.98 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (p2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X0) | ~ (m1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X1))),
% 2.17/0.98 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_176])).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(zip_derived_cl1173, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (p2 @ X0 @ b @ X0)),
% 2.17/0.98 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl834, zip_derived_cl213])).
% 2.17/0.98 thf(rule_155, axiom,
% 2.17/0.99 (( p2 @ H @ I @ I ) | ( ~( k1 @ J ) ) | ( ~( p2 @ e @ H @ I ) ))).
% 2.17/0.99 thf(zip_derived_cl192, plain,
% 2.17/0.99 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 2.17/0.99 ( (p2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X1) | ~ (k1 @ X2) | ~ (p2 @ e @ X0 @ X1))),
% 2.17/0.99 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_155])).
% 2.17/0.99 thf(zip_derived_cl1339, plain,
% 2.17/0.99 (![X0 : $i]: ( (p2 @ b @ e @ e) | ~ (k1 @ X0))),
% 2.17/0.99 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)],
% 2.17/0.99 [zip_derived_cl1173, zip_derived_cl192])).
% 2.17/0.99 thf(axiom_34, axiom, (n0 @ c @ d)).
% 2.17/0.99 thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain, ( (n0 @ c @ d)),
% 2.17/0.99 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_34])).
% 2.17/0.99 thf(rule_001, axiom, (( k1 @ I ) | ( ~( n0 @ J @ I ) ))).
% 2.17/0.99 thf(zip_derived_cl38, plain,
% 2.17/0.99 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (k1 @ X0) | ~ (n0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 2.17/0.99 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_001])).
% 2.17/0.99 thf(zip_derived_cl712, plain, ( (k1 @ d)),
% 2.17/0.99 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl33, zip_derived_cl38])).
% 2.17/0.99 thf(zip_derived_cl1348, plain, ( (p2 @ b @ e @ e)),
% 2.17/0.99 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)],
% 2.17/0.99 [zip_derived_cl1339, zip_derived_cl712])).
% 2.17/0.99 thf(zip_derived_cl1615, plain, ($false),
% 2.17/0.99 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 2.17/0.99 [zip_derived_cl1614, zip_derived_cl1348])).
% 2.17/0.99
% 2.17/0.99 % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.17/0.99
% 2.17/0.99
% 2.17/0.99 % Terminating...
% 2.60/1.07 % Runner terminated.
% 2.60/1.08 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------