TSTP Solution File: SYN264-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SYN264-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:29:50 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.37s 0.97s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 6 unt; 1 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 37 ( 0 equ; 22 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 3 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 9 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
~ p1(e,c,e),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_54,plain,
s0(b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_5) ).
cnf(c_69,plain,
l0(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_20) ).
cnf(c_75,plain,
n0(d,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_26) ).
cnf(c_77,plain,
k0(e),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_28) ).
cnf(c_150,plain,
( ~ n0(d,X0)
| ~ k0(X1)
| p1(X0,X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_063) ).
cnf(c_158,plain,
( ~ p1(X0,X1,X2)
| ~ l0(X3)
| ~ s0(b)
| p1(X2,X0,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_071) ).
cnf(c_699,plain,
( ~ l0(X3)
| ~ p1(X0,X1,X2)
| p1(X2,X0,X2) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_158,c_54,c_158]) ).
cnf(c_700,plain,
( ~ p1(X0,X1,X2)
| ~ l0(X3)
| p1(X2,X0,X2) ),
inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_699]) ).
cnf(c_721,plain,
( ~ l0(X0)
| ~ sP0_iProver_def ),
inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[sP0_iProver_def])],[c_700]) ).
cnf(c_722,plain,
( ~ p1(X0,X1,X2)
| p1(X2,X0,X2)
| ~ sP1_iProver_def ),
inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[sP1_iProver_def])],[c_700]) ).
cnf(c_723,plain,
( sP0_iProver_def
| sP1_iProver_def ),
inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[])],[c_700]) ).
cnf(c_792,plain,
( ~ l0(a)
| ~ sP0_iProver_def ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_721]) ).
cnf(c_878,plain,
( ~ p1(c,X0,e)
| ~ sP1_iProver_def
| p1(e,c,e) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_722]) ).
cnf(c_893,plain,
( ~ p1(c,c,e)
| ~ sP1_iProver_def
| p1(e,c,e) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_878]) ).
cnf(c_894,plain,
( ~ n0(d,c)
| ~ k0(e)
| p1(c,c,e) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_150]) ).
cnf(c_895,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_894,c_893,c_792,c_723,c_49,c_75,c_69,c_77]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07 % Problem : SYN264-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.08/0.26 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.26 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.26 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.26 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.26 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.26 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.26 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.26 % DateTime : Thu May 2 20:45:19 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.27 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.34 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.37/0.97 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.37/0.97 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97 ------ iProver source info
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.37/0.97 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.37/0.97 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97 ------ Parsing...successful
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97 ------ preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 233 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97 ------ Preprocessing...------ preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 2.37/0.97 gs_s sp: 28 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.37/0.97 ------ Proving...
% 2.37/0.97 ------ Problem Properties
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97 clauses 134
% 2.37/0.97 conjectures 1
% 2.37/0.97 EPR 134
% 2.37/0.97 Horn 120
% 2.37/0.97 unary 48
% 2.37/0.97 binary 40
% 2.37/0.97 lits 280
% 2.37/0.97 lits eq 0
% 2.37/0.97 fd_pure 0
% 2.37/0.97 fd_pseudo 0
% 2.37/0.97 fd_cond 0
% 2.37/0.97 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 2.37/0.97 AC symbols 0
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97 ------ Schedule EPR non Horn non eq is on
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97 ------ no equalities: superposition off
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false" Time Limit: 70.
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97 ------
% 2.37/0.97 Current options:
% 2.37/0.97 ------
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97 ------ Proving...
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.37/0.97
% 2.37/0.97
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------