TSTP Solution File: SYN264-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SYN264-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.wnoz9HRRpE true
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 04:02:26 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.57s 0.83s
% Output : Refutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN264-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.wnoz9HRRpE true
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 19:06:41 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.48/0.62 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.48/0.62 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.48/0.62 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.55/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.56/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.81 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 0.57/0.83 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.57/0.83 % BCE start: 369
% 0.57/0.83 % BCE eliminated: 40
% 0.57/0.83 % PE start: 329
% 0.57/0.83 logic: neq
% 0.57/0.83 % PE eliminated: -6
% 0.57/0.83 % done 285 iterations in 0.129s
% 0.57/0.83 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.57/0.83 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.57/0.83 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(k0_type, type, k0: $i > $o).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(p1_type, type, p1: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(s0_type, type, s0: $i > $o).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(l0_type, type, l0: $i > $o).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(e_type, type, e: $i).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(n0_type, type, n0: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(axiom_26, axiom, (n0 @ d @ c)).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain, ( (n0 @ d @ c)),
% 0.57/0.83 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_26])).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(rule_063, axiom,
% 0.57/0.83 (( p1 @ D @ D @ E ) | ( ~( n0 @ d @ D ) ) | ( ~( k0 @ E ) ))).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(zip_derived_cl100, plain,
% 0.57/0.83 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.83 ( (p1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X1) | ~ (n0 @ d @ X0) | ~ (k0 @ X1))),
% 0.57/0.83 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_063])).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(zip_derived_cl1002, plain,
% 0.57/0.83 (![X0 : $i]: ( (p1 @ c @ c @ X0) | ~ (k0 @ X0))),
% 0.57/0.83 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl25, zip_derived_cl100])).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(axiom_28, axiom, (k0 @ e)).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain, ( (k0 @ e)),
% 0.57/0.83 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_28])).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(zip_derived_cl1036, plain, ( (p1 @ c @ c @ e)),
% 0.57/0.83 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1002, zip_derived_cl27])).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(rule_071, axiom,
% 0.57/0.83 (( p1 @ H @ I @ H ) | ( ~( l0 @ J ) ) | ( ~( p1 @ I @ A @ H ) ) |
% 0.57/0.83 ( ~( s0 @ b ) ))).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(zip_derived_cl108, plain,
% 0.57/0.83 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.83 ( (p1 @ X0 @ X1 @ X0)
% 0.57/0.83 | ~ (l0 @ X2)
% 0.57/0.83 | ~ (p1 @ X1 @ X3 @ X0)
% 0.57/0.83 | ~ (s0 @ b))),
% 0.57/0.83 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_071])).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(axiom_5, axiom, (s0 @ b)).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, ( (s0 @ b)),
% 0.57/0.83 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_5])).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(zip_derived_cl1027, plain,
% 0.57/0.83 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.83 ( (p1 @ X0 @ X1 @ X0) | ~ (l0 @ X2) | ~ (p1 @ X1 @ X3 @ X0))),
% 0.57/0.83 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl108, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(zip_derived_cl1042, plain,
% 0.57/0.83 (![X0 : $i]: ( (p1 @ e @ c @ e) | ~ (l0 @ X0))),
% 0.57/0.83 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)],
% 0.57/0.83 [zip_derived_cl1036, zip_derived_cl1027])).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(prove_this, conjecture, (p1 @ e @ c @ e)).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( p1 @ e @ c @ e )),
% 0.57/0.83 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(zip_derived_cl368, plain, (~ (p1 @ e @ c @ e)),
% 0.57/0.83 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(zip_derived_cl1044, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ~ (l0 @ X0)),
% 0.57/0.83 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1042, zip_derived_cl368])).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(axiom_20, axiom, (l0 @ a)).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain, ( (l0 @ a)),
% 0.57/0.83 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_20])).
% 0.57/0.83 thf(zip_derived_cl1045, plain, ($false),
% 0.57/0.83 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1044, zip_derived_cl19])).
% 0.57/0.83
% 0.57/0.83 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.57/0.83
% 0.57/0.83
% 0.57/0.83 % Terminating...
% 1.64/0.94 % Runner terminated.
% 1.64/0.95 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------