TSTP Solution File: SYN264-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SYN264-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:58:50 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.47s 0.65s
% Output   : Refutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;  11 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   18 (   0 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_5,axiom,
    s0(b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_5) ).

cnf(axiom_24,axiom,
    l0(c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_24) ).

cnf(axiom_26,axiom,
    n0(d,c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_26) ).

cnf(axiom_28,axiom,
    k0(e),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_28) ).

cnf(rule_063,axiom,
    ( p1(X,X,Y)
    | ~ n0(d,X)
    | ~ k0(Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_063) ).

cnf(rule_071,axiom,
    ( p1(X,Y,X)
    | ~ l0(Z)
    | ~ p1(Y,U,X)
    | ~ s0(b) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_071) ).

cnf(117,plain,
    ( p1(X,Y,X)
    | ~ l0(Z)
    | ~ p1(Y,U,X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[rule_071,axiom_5]) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p1(e,c,e),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(472,plain,
    p1(c,c,e),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[rule_063,axiom_26,axiom_28]) ).

cnf(478,plain,
    ~ p1(c,X,e),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[117,prove_this,axiom_24]) ).

cnf(479,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[472,478]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : SYN264-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 19:56:15 EDT 2022
% 0.21/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.49  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.51  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.51  * 
% 0.21/0.51  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.51  * 
% 0.21/0.51  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.51   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.51   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.51   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.51   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.51   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.51   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.51   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.51   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.51   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.51   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.51   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.51   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.51  * 
% 0.21/0.51  "."
% 0.21/0.51  * 
% 0.21/0.51  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T19:56:15
% 0.21/0.51  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n010.cluster.edu at 2022-07-11T19:56:15
% 0.40/0.59  WARNING:
% 0.40/0.59     |m5| is a 2-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.40/0.59  WARNING:
% 0.40/0.59     |q5| is a 2-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.40/0.59  WARNING:
% 0.40/0.59     |r5| is a 2-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.47/0.65  
% 0.47/0.65  
% 0.47/0.65  #||
% 0.47/0.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.65  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.47/0.65  ||#
% 0.47/0.65  
% 0.47/0.65  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.47/0.65  ;       749 formulas have been input or derived (from 181 formulas).
% 0.47/0.65  ;       479 (64%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.47/0.65  ;          211 (44%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.47/0.65  ;          268 (56%) are still being kept.
% 0.47/0.65  ; 
% 0.47/0.65  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.063  45%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.009   6%   Assert                       (369 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.018  13%   Process new row              (629 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.003   2%   Resolution                   (360 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.000   0%   Paramodulation               (180 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.002   1%   Condensing                   (320 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.006   4%   Forward subsumption          (320 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.005   4%   Backward subsumption         (306 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.001   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (163 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.005   4%   Forward simplification       (606 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.006   4%   Backward simplification      (432 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.001   1%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.022  16%   Other
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.141        Total
% 0.47/0.65  ;     0.143        Real time
% 0.47/0.65  ; 
% 0.47/0.65  ; Term-hash-array has 582 terms in all.
% 0.47/0.65  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 176 entries (273 at peak, 306 added, 130 deleted).
% 0.47/0.65  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 660 nodes (936 at peak, 1,050 added, 390 deleted).
% 0.47/0.65  ;  Retrieved 139 possibly forward subsuming rows in 320 calls.
% 0.47/0.65  ;  Retrieved 151 possibly backward subsumed rows in 306 calls.
% 0.47/0.65  ; Path-index has 455 entries (528 at peak, 621 added, 166 deleted).
% 0.47/0.65  ; Path-index has 442 nodes (464 at peak, 510 added, 68 deleted).
% 0.47/0.65  ; Trie-index has 455 entries (528 at peak, 621 added, 166 deleted).
% 0.47/0.65  ; Trie-index has 538 nodes (587 at peak, 732 added, 194 deleted).
% 0.47/0.65  ; Retrieved 249 generalization terms in 681 calls.
% 0.47/0.65  ; Retrieved 356 instance terms in 125 calls.
% 0.47/0.65  ; Retrieved 4,078 unifiable terms in 782 calls.
% 0.47/0.65  ; 
% 0.47/0.65  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 84 entries:
% 0.47/0.65  ;    21 with value 13             11 with value 17               5 with value 20
% 0.47/0.65  ;     9 with value 14              4 with value 18               3 with value 21
% 0.47/0.65  ;    14 with value 15              6 with value 19               1 with value 22
% 0.47/0.65  ;    10 with value 16
% 0.47/0.65  ; The agenda of rows to give has 52 entries:
% 0.47/0.65  ;    10 with value (4 4)           8 with value (4 5)           34 with value (4 6)
% 0.47/0.65  Evaluation took:
% 0.47/0.65    0.144 seconds of real time
% 0.47/0.65    0.130406 seconds of user run time
% 0.47/0.65    0.01309 seconds of system run time
% 0.47/0.65    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.47/0.65    0 page faults and
% 0.47/0.65    8,079,016 bytes consed.
% 0.47/0.65  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.47/0.65  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T19:56:15
% 0.47/0.65  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.47/0.65  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------