TSTP Solution File: SYN251-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN251-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:29:41 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 14 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_015,axiom,
( m1(X1,X2,X2)
| ~ l0(X3)
| ~ m0(X2,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Jt3orQcgMJ/E---3.1_1079.p',rule_015) ).
cnf(axiom_31,axiom,
m0(b,b,e),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Jt3orQcgMJ/E---3.1_1079.p',axiom_31) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ m1(e,b,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Jt3orQcgMJ/E---3.1_1079.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_20,axiom,
l0(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Jt3orQcgMJ/E---3.1_1079.p',axiom_20) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( m1(X1,X2,X2)
| ~ l0(X3)
| ~ m0(X2,X2,X1) ),
rule_015 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
m0(b,b,e),
axiom_31 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ m1(e,b,b),
prove_this ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
l0(a),
axiom_20 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
~ l0(X1),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.09 % Problem : SYN251-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.09/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 19:20:13 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.40 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Jt3orQcgMJ/E---3.1_1079.p
% 0.15/0.43 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # new_bool_3 with pid 1158 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.43 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 1161 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.43 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.43 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.15/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 160
% 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses : 209
% 0.15/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 204
% 0.15/0.43 # Processed clauses : 318
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 11
% 0.15/0.43 # ...subsumed : 17
% 0.15/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 290
% 0.15/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.15/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 11
% 0.15/0.43 # Generated clauses : 94
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 58
% 0.15/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Paramodulations : 92
% 0.15/0.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 106
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 97
% 0.15/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 62
% 0.15/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 33
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 121
% 0.15/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 334
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 193
% 0.15/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6705
% 0.15/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4853
% 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 19
% 0.15/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 69
% 0.15/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 21
% 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 10
% 0.15/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7259
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.018 s
% 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 2300 pages
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.021 s
% 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.026 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 2000 pages
% 0.15/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------