TSTP Solution File: SYN249-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SYN249-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.q53f37J9yx true

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 04:02:22 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.87s
% Output   : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SYN249-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.q53f37J9yx true
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 16:51:17 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.69  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.69  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.69  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.20/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.20/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.57/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.57/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/0.87  % Solved by fo/fo7.sh.
% 0.60/0.87  % done 204 iterations in 0.076s
% 0.60/0.87  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.60/0.87  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.60/0.87  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(q0_type, type, q0: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(k1_type, type, k1: $i > $o).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(e_type, type, e: $i).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(m1_type, type, m1: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(n0_type, type, n0: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(rule_034, axiom,
% 0.60/0.87    (( m1 @ A @ B @ B ) | ( ~( k1 @ a ) ) | ( ~( k1 @ B ) ) | 
% 0.60/0.87     ( ~( q0 @ A @ A ) ))).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(zip_derived_cl71, plain,
% 0.60/0.87      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.87         ( (m1 @ X0 @ X1 @ X1) | ~ (k1 @ a) | ~ (k1 @ X1) | ~ (q0 @ X0 @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.87      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_034])).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(axiom_37, axiom, (n0 @ b @ a)).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(zip_derived_cl36, plain, ( (n0 @ b @ a)),
% 0.60/0.87      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_37])).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(rule_001, axiom, (( k1 @ I ) | ( ~( n0 @ J @ I ) ))).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(zip_derived_cl38, plain,
% 0.60/0.87      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (k1 @ X0) | ~ (n0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.87      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_001])).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(zip_derived_cl369, plain, ( (k1 @ a)),
% 0.60/0.87      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl36, zip_derived_cl38])).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(zip_derived_cl519, plain,
% 0.60/0.87      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.87         ( (m1 @ X0 @ X1 @ X1) | ~ (k1 @ X1) | ~ (q0 @ X0 @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.87      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl71, zip_derived_cl369])).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(prove_this, conjecture, (m1 @ d @ e @ e)).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( m1 @ d @ e @ e )),
% 0.60/0.87    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(zip_derived_cl292, plain, (~ (m1 @ d @ e @ e)),
% 0.60/0.87      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(zip_derived_cl522, plain, ((~ (q0 @ d @ d) | ~ (k1 @ e))),
% 0.60/0.87      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl519, zip_derived_cl292])).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(axiom_17, axiom, (q0 @ X @ d)).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (q0 @ X0 @ d)),
% 0.60/0.87      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_17])).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(axiom_3, axiom, (n0 @ d @ e)).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain, ( (n0 @ d @ e)),
% 0.60/0.87      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_3])).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(zip_derived_cl38, plain,
% 0.60/0.87      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (k1 @ X0) | ~ (n0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.87      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_001])).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(zip_derived_cl297, plain, ( (k1 @ e)),
% 0.60/0.87      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl38])).
% 0.60/0.87  thf(zip_derived_cl523, plain, ($false),
% 0.60/0.87      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.60/0.87                [zip_derived_cl522, zip_derived_cl16, zip_derived_cl297])).
% 0.60/0.87  
% 0.60/0.87  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.60/0.87  
% 0.60/0.87  
% 0.60/0.87  % Terminating...
% 1.98/0.98  % Runner terminated.
% 1.98/0.99  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------