TSTP Solution File: SYN242-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN242-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:11:08 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.76s 0.93s
% Output : Refutation 0.76s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN242-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 01:20:59 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.39 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.39 The process was started by sandbox on n028.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.39 Tue Jul 12 01:20:59 2022
% 0.21/0.39 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 25171.
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.39 set(auto).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.39 clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 list(usable).
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.21/0.39 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.21/0.39 in usable.
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [] {-} m1(A,A,A)| -q0(B,C)| -q0(B,A).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [] {-} m1(A,A,A)| -m0(B,C,A).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [] {-} m1(A,A,A)| -l0(A)| -k0(A)| -m0(A,A,A).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} m1(e,e,e)| -r0(e).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p1(A,A,A)| -n0(e,b)| -k0(b)| -k0(A)| -k1(B).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 64 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p1(A,A,B)| -p0(B,A)| -r0(A).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p1(e,e,e)| -r0(e)| -k0(e).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 88 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -s0(A)| -m0(B,B,C).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 88 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -s0(A).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 88 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(d,d,d)| -k0(e)| -s0(d).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 105 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(b,b,b)| -r0(b).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 99 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -m0(B,C,A).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 99 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -m0(A,B,A).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 105 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -m0(c,A,A)| -r0(A).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 142 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p2(A,A,A)| -s1(A)| -k1(A).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 224 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p3(A,A,A)| -n2(A)| -q2(B,C,A)| -s1(B).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 224 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p3(A,A,A)| -k1(A)| -n2(A).
% 0.21/0.39 13 back subsumes 9.
% 0.21/0.39 14 back subsumes 6.
% 0.21/0.39 28 back subsumes 21.
% 0.21/0.39 28 back subsumes 17.
% 0.21/0.39 40 back subsumes 39.
% 0.21/0.39 52 back subsumes 51.
% 0.21/0.39 77 back subsumes 68.
% 0.21/0.39 77 back subsumes 65.
% 0.21/0.39 142 back subsumes 134.
% 0.21/0.39 194 back subsumes 180.
% 0.21/0.39 216 back subsumes 213.
% 0.21/0.39 216 back subsumes 212.
% 0.21/0.39 244 back subsumes 239.
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 321 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p0(b,c).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 324 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q0(d,d).
% 0.21/0.39 321 back subsumes 317.
% 0.21/0.39 324 back subsumes 309.
% 0.21/0.39 326 back subsumes 315.
% 0.21/0.39 326 back subsumes 311.
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.49 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.49 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.49 number of clauses in intial UL: 294
% 0.21/0.49 number of clauses initially in problem: 326
% 0.21/0.49 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 90
% 0.21/0.49 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.21/0.49 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.49 absolute distinct symbol count: 53
% 0.21/0.49 distinct predicate count: 48
% 0.21/0.49 distinct function count: 0
% 0.21/0.49 distinct constant count: 5
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.76/0.93 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/0.93 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 Model 5 [ 3 2 4361 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 Model 6 [ 1 4 14747 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.53 sec ----> 359 [binary,358.1,307.1] {-} $F.
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 Length of proof is 1. Level of proof is 1.
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.76/0.93 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/0.93 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 22 [] {+} m1(a,a,a)| -l0(a)| -s0(d).
% 0.76/0.93 307 [] {+} -m1(a,a,a).
% 0.76/0.93 308 [] {+} s0(d).
% 0.76/0.93 327 [] {+} l0(a).
% 0.76/0.93 358 [hyper,327,22,308] {-} m1(a,a,a).
% 0.76/0.93 359 [binary,358.1,307.1] {-} $F.
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.76/0.93 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 ============ end of search ============
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 true clauses given 0 (0.0%)
% 0.76/0.93 false clauses given 5
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 FALSE TRUE
% 0.76/0.93 2 3 0
% 0.76/0.93 3 8 8
% 0.76/0.93 4 6 13
% 0.76/0.93 tot: 17 21 (55.3% true)
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 Model 6 [ 1 4 14747 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 Process 25171 finished Tue Jul 12 01:21:00 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------