TSTP Solution File: SYN236-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SYN236-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:58:38 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.09s 0.49s
% Output : Refutation 0.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_7,axiom,
n0(d,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_7) ).
cnf(axiom_13,axiom,
r0(e),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_13) ).
cnf(axiom_28,axiom,
k0(e),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_28) ).
cnf(rule_001,axiom,
( k1(X)
| ~ n0(Y,X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_001) ).
cnf(rule_090,axiom,
( p1(e,e,e)
| ~ r0(e)
| ~ k0(e) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_090) ).
cnf(138,plain,
p1(e,e,e),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[rule_090,axiom_28,axiom_13]) ).
cnf(rule_136,axiom,
( m2(b)
| ~ k1(b) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_136) ).
cnf(rule_137,axiom,
( n2(X)
| ~ p1(Y,Z,X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_137) ).
cnf(rule_217,axiom,
( l3(X,X)
| ~ n2(X)
| ~ m2(b) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_217) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ l3(e,e),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(382,plain,
k1(b),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[rule_001,axiom_7]) ).
cnf(383,plain,
m2(b),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[rule_136,382]) ).
cnf(384,plain,
( l3(X,X)
| ~ n2(X) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[rule_217,383]) ).
cnf(394,plain,
~ n2(e),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[384,prove_this]) ).
cnf(415,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[rule_137,138]),394]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.06 % Problem : SYN236-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.05/0.06 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.05/0.25 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.05/0.25 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.05/0.25 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.05/0.25 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.05/0.25 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.05/0.25 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.05/0.25 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.05/0.25 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 02:02:23 EDT 2022
% 0.05/0.25 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.37 *
% 0.09/0.37 *
% 0.09/0.38 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.09/0.38 *
% 0.09/0.38 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.09/0.38 *
% 0.09/0.38 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.09/0.38 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.09/0.38 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.09/0.38 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.09/0.38 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.09/0.38 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.09/0.38 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.09/0.38 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.09/0.38 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.09/0.38 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.09/0.38 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.09/0.38 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.09/0.38 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.09/0.38 *
% 0.09/0.38 "."
% 0.09/0.38 *
% 0.09/0.38 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-12T02:02:23
% 0.09/0.38 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n019.cluster.edu at 2022-07-12T02:02:23
% 0.09/0.46 WARNING:
% 0.09/0.46 |m5| is a 2-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.09/0.46 WARNING:
% 0.09/0.46 |q5| is a 2-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.09/0.46 WARNING:
% 0.09/0.46 |r5| is a 2-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.09/0.49
% 0.09/0.49
% 0.09/0.49 #||
% 0.09/0.49 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.49 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.49 ||#
% 0.09/0.49
% 0.09/0.49 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.09/0.49 ; 495 formulas have been input or derived (from 70 formulas).
% 0.09/0.49 ; 415 (84%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.09/0.49 ; 80 (19%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.09/0.49 ; 335 (81%) are still being kept.
% 0.09/0.49 ;
% 0.09/0.49 ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.09/0.49 ; 0.060 54% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.09/0.49 ; 0.005 5% Assert (369 calls)
% 0.09/0.49 ; 0.011 10% Process new row (431 calls)
% 0.09/0.49 ; 0.000 0% Resolution (138 calls)
% 0.09/0.49 ; 0.001 1% Paramodulation (69 calls)
% 0.09/0.49 ; 0.003 3% Condensing (308 calls)
% 0.09/0.49 ; 0.001 1% Forward subsumption (308 calls)
% 0.09/0.49 ; 0.002 2% Backward subsumption (294 calls)
% 0.09/0.49 ; 0.001 1% Clause clause subsumption (152 calls)
% 0.09/0.49 ; 0.004 4% Forward simplification (420 calls)
% 0.09/0.49 ; 0.001 1% Backward simplification (368 calls)
% 0.09/0.49 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.09/0.49 ; 0.001 1% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.09/0.49 ; 0.021 19% Other
% 0.09/0.49 ; 0.111 Total
% 0.09/0.49 ; 0.112 Real time
% 0.09/0.49 ;
% 0.09/0.49 ; Term-hash-array has 542 terms in all.
% 0.09/0.49 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 266 entries (273 at peak, 294 added, 28 deleted).
% 0.09/0.49 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 870 nodes (936 at peak, 1,014 added, 144 deleted).
% 0.09/0.49 ; Retrieved 135 possibly forward subsuming rows in 308 calls.
% 0.09/0.49 ; Retrieved 133 possibly backward subsumed rows in 294 calls.
% 0.09/0.49 ; Path-index has 523 entries (526 at peak, 565 added, 42 deleted).
% 0.09/0.49 ; Path-index has 457 nodes (458 at peak, 488 added, 31 deleted).
% 0.09/0.49 ; Trie-index has 523 entries (526 at peak, 565 added, 42 deleted).
% 0.09/0.49 ; Trie-index has 578 nodes (584 at peak, 643 added, 65 deleted).
% 0.09/0.49 ; Retrieved 100 generalization terms in 503 calls.
% 0.09/0.49 ; Retrieved 78 instance terms in 73 calls.
% 0.09/0.49 ; Retrieved 1,651 unifiable terms in 284 calls.
% 0.09/0.49 ;
% 0.09/0.49 ; The agenda of rows to process has 2 entries:
% 0.09/0.49 ; 2 with value 4
% 0.09/0.49 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 245 entries:
% 0.09/0.49 ; 18 with value 8 17 with value 14 9 with value 19
% 0.09/0.49 ; 24 with value 9 21 with value 15 6 with value 20
% 0.09/0.49 ; 34 with value 10 10 with value 16 4 with value 21
% 0.09/0.49 ; 8 with value 11 18 with value 17 3 with value 22
% 0.09/0.49 ; 24 with value 12 8 with value 18 1 with value 24
% 0.09/0.49 ; 40 with value 13
% 0.09/0.49 ; The agenda of rows to give has 23 entries:
% 0.09/0.49 ; 9 with value (4 4) 5 with value (4 5) 9 with value (4 6)
% 0.09/0.49 Evaluation took:
% 0.09/0.49 0.112 seconds of real time
% 0.09/0.49 0.101868 seconds of user run time
% 0.09/0.49 0.010101 seconds of system run time
% 0.09/0.49 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.09/0.49 0 page faults and
% 0.09/0.49 7,386,288 bytes consed.
% 0.09/0.49 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.09/0.49 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-12T02:02:23
% 0.09/0.49 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.09/0.49 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------