TSTP Solution File: SYN233-1 by Z3---4.8.9.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem  : SYN233-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 23:54:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.49s
% Output   : Proof 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   36
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   76 (  17 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  256 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  327 ( 150   ~; 137   |;   0   &)
%                                         (  40 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :   10 (  10 fml;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   13 (   6   >;   7   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  10 usr;   2 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   95 (  86   !;   0   ?;  95   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(l3_type,type,
    l3: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(e_type,type,
    e: $i ).

tff(p2_type,type,
    p2: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(m1_type,type,
    m1: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(r0_type,type,
    r0: $i > $o ).

tff(p1_type,type,
    p1: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(k0_type,type,
    k0: $i > $o ).

tff(1,plain,
    ^ [D: $i,E: $i] :
      refl(
        ( ( p2(D,E,D)
          | ~ m1(E,D,E) )
      <=> ( p2(D,E,D)
          | ~ m1(E,D,E) ) )),
    inference(bind,[status(th)],]) ).

tff(2,plain,
    ( ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
        ( p2(D,E,D)
        | ~ m1(E,D,E) )
  <=> ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
        ( p2(D,E,D)
        | ~ m1(E,D,E) ) ),
    inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

tff(3,plain,
    ( ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
        ( p2(D,E,D)
        | ~ m1(E,D,E) )
  <=> ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
        ( p2(D,E,D)
        | ~ m1(E,D,E) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(4,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
      ( p2(D,E,D)
      | ~ m1(E,D,E) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_176) ).

tff(5,plain,
    ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
      ( p2(D,E,D)
      | ~ m1(E,D,E) ),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[4,3]) ).

tff(6,plain,
    ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
      ( p2(D,E,D)
      | ~ m1(E,D,E) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[5]) ).

tff(7,plain,
    ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
      ( p2(D,E,D)
      | ~ m1(E,D,E) ),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[6,2]) ).

tff(8,plain,
    ( m1(e,e,e)
  <=> m1(e,e,e) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(9,plain,
    ( ( $false
      | m1(e,e,e) )
  <=> m1(e,e,e) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(10,plain,
    ( ~ $true
  <=> $false ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(11,axiom,
    r0(e),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_13) ).

tff(12,plain,
    ( r0(e)
  <=> $true ),
    inference(iff_true,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

tff(13,plain,
    ( ~ r0(e)
  <=> ~ $true ),
    inference(monotonicity,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

tff(14,plain,
    ( ~ r0(e)
  <=> $false ),
    inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[13,10]) ).

tff(15,plain,
    ( ( ~ r0(e)
      | m1(e,e,e) )
  <=> ( $false
      | m1(e,e,e) ) ),
    inference(monotonicity,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

tff(16,plain,
    ( ( ~ r0(e)
      | m1(e,e,e) )
  <=> m1(e,e,e) ),
    inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[15,9]) ).

tff(17,plain,
    ( ( m1(e,e,e)
      | ~ r0(e) )
  <=> ( ~ r0(e)
      | m1(e,e,e) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(18,axiom,
    ( m1(e,e,e)
    | ~ r0(e) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_012) ).

tff(19,plain,
    ( ~ r0(e)
    | m1(e,e,e) ),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[18,17]) ).

tff(20,plain,
    m1(e,e,e),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[19,16]) ).

tff(21,plain,
    m1(e,e,e),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[20,8]) ).

tff(22,plain,
    ( ( ~ ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
            ( p2(D,E,D)
            | ~ m1(E,D,E) )
      | ~ m1(e,e,e)
      | p2(e,e,e) )
  <=> ( ~ ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
            ( p2(D,E,D)
            | ~ m1(E,D,E) )
      | ~ m1(e,e,e)
      | p2(e,e,e) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(23,plain,
    ( ( p2(e,e,e)
      | ~ m1(e,e,e) )
  <=> ( ~ m1(e,e,e)
      | p2(e,e,e) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(24,plain,
    ( ( ~ ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
            ( p2(D,E,D)
            | ~ m1(E,D,E) )
      | p2(e,e,e)
      | ~ m1(e,e,e) )
  <=> ( ~ ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
            ( p2(D,E,D)
            | ~ m1(E,D,E) )
      | ~ m1(e,e,e)
      | p2(e,e,e) ) ),
    inference(monotonicity,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

tff(25,plain,
    ( ( ~ ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
            ( p2(D,E,D)
            | ~ m1(E,D,E) )
      | p2(e,e,e)
      | ~ m1(e,e,e) )
  <=> ( ~ ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
            ( p2(D,E,D)
            | ~ m1(E,D,E) )
      | ~ m1(e,e,e)
      | p2(e,e,e) ) ),
    inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[24,22]) ).

tff(26,plain,
    ( ~ ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
          ( p2(D,E,D)
          | ~ m1(E,D,E) )
    | p2(e,e,e)
    | ~ m1(e,e,e) ),
    inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(27,plain,
    ( ~ ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
          ( p2(D,E,D)
          | ~ m1(E,D,E) )
    | ~ m1(e,e,e)
    | p2(e,e,e) ),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[26,25]) ).

tff(28,plain,
    p2(e,e,e),
    inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[27,21,7]) ).

tff(29,plain,
    ^ [D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
      refl(
        ( ( ~ p2(E,F,D)
          | ~ p1(D,D,E)
          | l3(D,D) )
      <=> ( ~ p2(E,F,D)
          | ~ p1(D,D,E)
          | l3(D,D) ) )),
    inference(bind,[status(th)],]) ).

tff(30,plain,
    ( ! [D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
        ( ~ p2(E,F,D)
        | ~ p1(D,D,E)
        | l3(D,D) )
  <=> ! [D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
        ( ~ p2(E,F,D)
        | ~ p1(D,D,E)
        | l3(D,D) ) ),
    inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[29]) ).

tff(31,plain,
    ( ! [D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
        ( ~ p2(E,F,D)
        | ~ p1(D,D,E)
        | l3(D,D) )
  <=> ! [D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
        ( ~ p2(E,F,D)
        | ~ p1(D,D,E)
        | l3(D,D) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(32,plain,
    ^ [D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
      trans(
        monotonicity(
          rewrite(
            ( ( l3(D,D)
              | ~ p1(D,D,E) )
          <=> ( ~ p1(D,D,E)
              | l3(D,D) ) )),
          ( ( l3(D,D)
            | ~ p1(D,D,E)
            | ~ p2(E,F,D) )
        <=> ( ~ p1(D,D,E)
            | l3(D,D)
            | ~ p2(E,F,D) ) )),
        rewrite(
          ( ( ~ p1(D,D,E)
            | l3(D,D)
            | ~ p2(E,F,D) )
        <=> ( ~ p2(E,F,D)
            | ~ p1(D,D,E)
            | l3(D,D) ) )),
        ( ( l3(D,D)
          | ~ p1(D,D,E)
          | ~ p2(E,F,D) )
      <=> ( ~ p2(E,F,D)
          | ~ p1(D,D,E)
          | l3(D,D) ) )),
    inference(bind,[status(th)],]) ).

tff(33,plain,
    ( ! [D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
        ( l3(D,D)
        | ~ p1(D,D,E)
        | ~ p2(E,F,D) )
  <=> ! [D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
        ( ~ p2(E,F,D)
        | ~ p1(D,D,E)
        | l3(D,D) ) ),
    inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[32]) ).

tff(34,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
      ( l3(D,D)
      | ~ p1(D,D,E)
      | ~ p2(E,F,D) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_216) ).

tff(35,plain,
    ! [D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
      ( ~ p2(E,F,D)
      | ~ p1(D,D,E)
      | l3(D,D) ),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[34,33]) ).

tff(36,plain,
    ! [D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
      ( ~ p2(E,F,D)
      | ~ p1(D,D,E)
      | l3(D,D) ),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[35,31]) ).

tff(37,plain,
    ! [D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
      ( ~ p2(E,F,D)
      | ~ p1(D,D,E)
      | l3(D,D) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[36]) ).

tff(38,plain,
    ! [D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
      ( ~ p2(E,F,D)
      | ~ p1(D,D,E)
      | l3(D,D) ),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[37,30]) ).

tff(39,plain,
    ( p1(e,e,e)
  <=> p1(e,e,e) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(40,plain,
    ( ( $false
      | $false
      | p1(e,e,e) )
  <=> p1(e,e,e) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(41,axiom,
    k0(e),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_28) ).

tff(42,plain,
    ( k0(e)
  <=> $true ),
    inference(iff_true,[status(thm)],[41]) ).

tff(43,plain,
    ( ~ k0(e)
  <=> ~ $true ),
    inference(monotonicity,[status(thm)],[42]) ).

tff(44,plain,
    ( ~ k0(e)
  <=> $false ),
    inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[43,10]) ).

tff(45,plain,
    ( ( ~ r0(e)
      | ~ k0(e)
      | p1(e,e,e) )
  <=> ( $false
      | $false
      | p1(e,e,e) ) ),
    inference(monotonicity,[status(thm)],[14,44]) ).

tff(46,plain,
    ( ( ~ r0(e)
      | ~ k0(e)
      | p1(e,e,e) )
  <=> p1(e,e,e) ),
    inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[45,40]) ).

tff(47,plain,
    ( ( ~ r0(e)
      | ~ k0(e)
      | p1(e,e,e) )
  <=> ( ~ r0(e)
      | ~ k0(e)
      | p1(e,e,e) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(48,plain,
    ( ( ~ r0(e)
      | p1(e,e,e)
      | ~ k0(e) )
  <=> ( ~ r0(e)
      | ~ k0(e)
      | p1(e,e,e) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(49,plain,
    ( ( p1(e,e,e)
      | ~ r0(e) )
  <=> ( ~ r0(e)
      | p1(e,e,e) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(50,plain,
    ( ( p1(e,e,e)
      | ~ r0(e)
      | ~ k0(e) )
  <=> ( ~ r0(e)
      | p1(e,e,e)
      | ~ k0(e) ) ),
    inference(monotonicity,[status(thm)],[49]) ).

tff(51,plain,
    ( ( p1(e,e,e)
      | ~ r0(e)
      | ~ k0(e) )
  <=> ( ~ r0(e)
      | ~ k0(e)
      | p1(e,e,e) ) ),
    inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[50,48]) ).

tff(52,axiom,
    ( p1(e,e,e)
    | ~ r0(e)
    | ~ k0(e) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_090) ).

tff(53,plain,
    ( ~ r0(e)
    | ~ k0(e)
    | p1(e,e,e) ),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[52,51]) ).

tff(54,plain,
    ( ~ r0(e)
    | ~ k0(e)
    | p1(e,e,e) ),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[53,47]) ).

tff(55,plain,
    p1(e,e,e),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[54,46]) ).

tff(56,plain,
    p1(e,e,e),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[55,39]) ).

tff(57,plain,
    ( ( ~ ! [D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
            ( ~ p2(E,F,D)
            | ~ p1(D,D,E)
            | l3(D,D) )
      | ~ p2(e,e,e)
      | ~ p1(e,e,e)
      | l3(e,e) )
  <=> ( ~ ! [D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
            ( ~ p2(E,F,D)
            | ~ p1(D,D,E)
            | l3(D,D) )
      | ~ p2(e,e,e)
      | ~ p1(e,e,e)
      | l3(e,e) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(58,plain,
    ( ~ ! [D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
          ( ~ p2(E,F,D)
          | ~ p1(D,D,E)
          | l3(D,D) )
    | ~ p2(e,e,e)
    | ~ p1(e,e,e)
    | l3(e,e) ),
    inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(59,plain,
    ( ~ ! [D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
          ( ~ p2(E,F,D)
          | ~ p1(D,D,E)
          | l3(D,D) )
    | ~ p2(e,e,e)
    | ~ p1(e,e,e)
    | l3(e,e) ),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[58,57]) ).

tff(60,plain,
    l3(e,e),
    inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[59,56,38,28]) ).

tff(61,plain,
    ^ [X: $i] :
      refl(
        ( ~ l3(e,X)
      <=> ~ l3(e,X) )),
    inference(bind,[status(th)],]) ).

tff(62,plain,
    ( ! [X: $i] : ~ l3(e,X)
  <=> ! [X: $i] : ~ l3(e,X) ),
    inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[61]) ).

tff(63,plain,
    ( ! [X: $i] : ~ l3(e,X)
  <=> ! [X: $i] : ~ l3(e,X) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(64,axiom,
    ! [X: $i] : ~ l3(e,X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

tff(65,plain,
    ! [X: $i] : ~ l3(e,X),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[64,63]) ).

tff(66,plain,
    ! [X: $i] : ~ l3(e,X),
    inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[65]) ).

tff(67,plain,
    ! [X: $i] : ~ l3(e,X),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[66,62]) ).

tff(68,plain,
    ( ~ ! [X: $i] : ~ l3(e,X)
    | ~ l3(e,e) ),
    inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(69,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[68,67,60]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12  % Problem  : SYN233-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.08/0.13  % Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Sep  5 02:12:38 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.13/0.35  Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.13/0.35    -h, -?       prints this message.
% 0.13/0.35    -smt2        print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.13/0.35    -m, -model   generate model.
% 0.13/0.35    -p, -proof   generate proof.
% 0.13/0.35    -c, -core    generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.13/0.35    -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.13/0.35    -t:timeout   set timeout (in second).
% 0.13/0.35    -smt2status  display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.13/0.35    -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.13/0.35    -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.13/0.35    -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.21/0.49  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.49  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------