TSTP Solution File: SYN229-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN229-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:29:38 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.35s 0.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.35s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 28 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 26 RR)
% Number of literals : 47 ( 0 equ; 21 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 13 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_126,axiom,
( s1(X1)
| ~ q0(X1,X2)
| ~ s1(X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.g9rB5kb9Ha/E---3.1_22273.p',rule_126) ).
cnf(axiom_36,axiom,
q0(a,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.g9rB5kb9Ha/E---3.1_22273.p',axiom_36) ).
cnf(rule_125,axiom,
( s1(X1)
| ~ p0(X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.g9rB5kb9Ha/E---3.1_22273.p',rule_125) ).
cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.g9rB5kb9Ha/E---3.1_22273.p',axiom_14) ).
cnf(rule_190,axiom,
( s2(d)
| ~ s1(a)
| ~ s0(d) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.g9rB5kb9Ha/E---3.1_22273.p',rule_190) ).
cnf(axiom_1,axiom,
s0(d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.g9rB5kb9Ha/E---3.1_22273.p',axiom_1) ).
cnf(rule_220,axiom,
( l3(X1,X1)
| ~ s2(X2)
| ~ l1(X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.g9rB5kb9Ha/E---3.1_22273.p',rule_220) ).
cnf(rule_002,axiom,
( l1(X1,X1)
| ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.g9rB5kb9Ha/E---3.1_22273.p',rule_002) ).
cnf(axiom_26,axiom,
n0(d,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.g9rB5kb9Ha/E---3.1_22273.p',axiom_26) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ l3(c,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.g9rB5kb9Ha/E---3.1_22273.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( s1(X1)
| ~ q0(X1,X2)
| ~ s1(X3) ),
rule_126 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
q0(a,b),
axiom_36 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
( s1(X1)
| ~ p0(X1,X1) ),
rule_125 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
axiom_14 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
( s2(d)
| ~ s1(a)
| ~ s0(d) ),
rule_190 ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
s0(d),
axiom_1 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( s1(a)
| ~ s1(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
s1(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( s2(d)
| ~ s1(a) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
s1(a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
( l3(X1,X1)
| ~ s2(X2)
| ~ l1(X1,X1) ),
rule_220 ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
s2(d),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
( l1(X1,X1)
| ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
rule_002 ).
cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
n0(d,c),
axiom_26 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ l3(c,X1),
prove_this ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( l3(X1,X1)
| ~ l1(X1,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
l1(c,c),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN229-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:58:52 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.g9rB5kb9Ha/E---3.1_22273.p
% 0.35/0.56 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.35/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.35/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.35/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.35/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.56 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.56 # new_bool_3 with pid 22402 completed with status 0
% 0.35/0.56 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.35/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.35/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.35/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.35/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.56 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.35/0.56 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.35/0.56 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.35/0.56 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.56 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 22409 completed with status 0
% 0.35/0.56 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.35/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.35/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.35/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.35/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.56 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.35/0.56 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.35/0.56 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.35/0.56 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.56 # Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.35/0.56 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.35/0.56
% 0.35/0.56 # Proof found!
% 0.35/0.56 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.35/0.56 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.35/0.56 # Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.35/0.56 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 30
% 0.35/0.56 # Initial clauses : 339
% 0.35/0.56 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6
% 0.35/0.56 # Initial clauses in saturation : 333
% 0.35/0.56 # Processed clauses : 476
% 0.35/0.56 # ...of these trivial : 13
% 0.35/0.56 # ...subsumed : 24
% 0.35/0.56 # ...remaining for further processing : 439
% 0.35/0.56 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.35/0.56 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.35/0.56 # Backward-subsumed : 9
% 0.35/0.56 # Backward-rewritten : 20
% 0.35/0.56 # Generated clauses : 81
% 0.35/0.56 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 77
% 0.35/0.56 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.35/0.56 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.35/0.56 # Paramodulations : 81
% 0.35/0.56 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.35/0.56 # NegExts : 0
% 0.35/0.56 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.35/0.56 # Total rewrite steps : 105
% 0.35/0.56 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.35/0.56 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.35/0.56 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.35/0.56 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.35/0.56 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.35/0.56 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.35/0.56 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.56 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.56 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.56 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.56 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.56 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.56 # Current number of processed clauses : 111
% 0.35/0.56 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 61
% 0.35/0.56 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.35/0.56 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.35/0.56 # Non-unit-clauses : 45
% 0.35/0.56 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 230
% 0.35/0.56 # ...number of literals in the above : 683
% 0.35/0.56 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.35/0.56 # Current number of archived clauses : 328
% 0.35/0.56 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19796
% 0.35/0.56 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12788
% 0.35/0.56 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 29
% 0.35/0.56 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 123
% 0.35/0.56 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.35/0.56 # BW rewrite match attempts : 25
% 0.35/0.56 # BW rewrite match successes : 18
% 0.35/0.56 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.35/0.56 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.35/0.56 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9575
% 0.35/0.56
% 0.35/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.35/0.56 # User time : 0.037 s
% 0.35/0.56 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.35/0.56 # Total time : 0.042 s
% 0.35/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 2600 pages
% 0.35/0.56
% 0.35/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.35/0.56 # User time : 0.044 s
% 0.35/0.56 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.35/0.56 # Total time : 0.051 s
% 0.35/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 2000 pages
% 0.35/0.56 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------