TSTP Solution File: SYN220-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN220-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:14:07 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.41s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 22 RR)
% Number of literals : 35 ( 0 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 8 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_001,axiom,
( k1(X1)
| ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ifU30uZsFD/E---3.1_4653.p',rule_001) ).
cnf(axiom_7,axiom,
n0(d,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ifU30uZsFD/E---3.1_4653.p',axiom_7) ).
cnf(rule_136,axiom,
( m2(b)
| ~ k1(b) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ifU30uZsFD/E---3.1_4653.p',rule_136) ).
cnf(rule_068,axiom,
( p1(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ k0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ifU30uZsFD/E---3.1_4653.p',rule_068) ).
cnf(axiom_32,axiom,
k0(b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ifU30uZsFD/E---3.1_4653.p',axiom_32) ).
cnf(rule_217,axiom,
( l3(X1,X1)
| ~ n2(X1)
| ~ m2(b) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ifU30uZsFD/E---3.1_4653.p',rule_217) ).
cnf(rule_137,axiom,
( n2(X1)
| ~ p1(X2,X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ifU30uZsFD/E---3.1_4653.p',rule_137) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ l3(X1,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ifU30uZsFD/E---3.1_4653.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( k1(X1)
| ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
rule_001 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
n0(d,b),
axiom_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( m2(b)
| ~ k1(b) ),
rule_136 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
k1(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
( p1(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ k0(X1) ),
rule_068 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
k0(b),
axiom_32 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
( l3(X1,X1)
| ~ n2(X1)
| ~ m2(b) ),
rule_217 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
m2(b),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
( n2(X1)
| ~ p1(X2,X3,X1) ),
rule_137 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
p1(b,b,b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ l3(X1,b),
prove_this ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( l3(X1,X1)
| ~ n2(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
n2(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.15 % Problem : SYN220-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.12/0.16 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:10:31 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.38/0.56 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.38/0.56 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ifU30uZsFD/E---3.1_4653.p
% 0.41/0.61 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.41/0.61 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.61 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.61 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/0.61 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.61 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.61 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.61 # new_bool_3 with pid 4750 completed with status 0
% 0.41/0.61 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.41/0.61 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.61 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.61 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/0.61 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.61 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.41/0.61 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.41/0.61 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.41/0.61 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.61 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 4755 completed with status 0
% 0.41/0.61 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.41/0.61 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.61 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.61 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/0.61 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.61 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.41/0.61 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.41/0.61 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.41/0.61 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.61 # Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.41/0.61 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.41/0.61
% 0.41/0.61 # Proof found!
% 0.41/0.61 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.41/0.61 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.41/0.61 # Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.41/0.61 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 30
% 0.41/0.61 # Initial clauses : 339
% 0.41/0.61 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6
% 0.41/0.61 # Initial clauses in saturation : 333
% 0.41/0.61 # Processed clauses : 459
% 0.41/0.61 # ...of these trivial : 14
% 0.41/0.61 # ...subsumed : 23
% 0.41/0.61 # ...remaining for further processing : 422
% 0.41/0.61 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.41/0.61 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.41/0.61 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.41/0.61 # Backward-rewritten : 18
% 0.41/0.61 # Generated clauses : 69
% 0.41/0.61 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 62
% 0.41/0.61 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.41/0.61 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.41/0.61 # Paramodulations : 69
% 0.41/0.61 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.41/0.61 # NegExts : 0
% 0.41/0.61 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.41/0.61 # Total rewrite steps : 107
% 0.41/0.61 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.41/0.61 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.41/0.61 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.41/0.61 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.41/0.61 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.41/0.61 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.41/0.61 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.61 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.61 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.61 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.61 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.61 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.61 # Current number of processed clauses : 101
% 0.41/0.61 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 65
% 0.41/0.61 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.41/0.61 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.41/0.61 # Non-unit-clauses : 34
% 0.41/0.61 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 232
% 0.41/0.61 # ...number of literals in the above : 693
% 0.41/0.61 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.41/0.61 # Current number of archived clauses : 321
% 0.41/0.61 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19611
% 0.41/0.61 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12569
% 0.41/0.61 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 28
% 0.41/0.61 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 86
% 0.41/0.61 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.41/0.61 # BW rewrite match attempts : 16
% 0.41/0.61 # BW rewrite match successes : 15
% 0.41/0.61 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.41/0.61 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.41/0.61 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9451
% 0.41/0.61
% 0.41/0.61 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.61 # User time : 0.032 s
% 0.41/0.61 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.41/0.61 # Total time : 0.039 s
% 0.41/0.61 # Maximum resident set size: 2484 pages
% 0.41/0.61
% 0.41/0.61 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.61 # User time : 0.038 s
% 0.41/0.61 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.41/0.61 # Total time : 0.047 s
% 0.41/0.61 # Maximum resident set size: 1996 pages
% 0.41/0.61 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.41/0.61 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------