TSTP Solution File: SYN216-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN216-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:14:07 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.59s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.59s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 35 ( 0 equ; 18 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 15 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_126,axiom,
( s1(X1)
| ~ q0(X1,X2)
| ~ s1(X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SbJYTHYE5Z/E---3.1_27963.p',rule_126) ).
cnf(axiom_17,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SbJYTHYE5Z/E---3.1_27963.p',axiom_17) ).
cnf(rule_125,axiom,
( s1(X1)
| ~ p0(X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SbJYTHYE5Z/E---3.1_27963.p',rule_125) ).
cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SbJYTHYE5Z/E---3.1_27963.p',axiom_14) ).
cnf(rule_133,axiom,
( l2(X1,X1)
| ~ p0(X2,X2)
| ~ s1(X3)
| ~ m0(X4,X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SbJYTHYE5Z/E---3.1_27963.p',rule_133) ).
cnf(axiom_16,axiom,
m0(c,b,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SbJYTHYE5Z/E---3.1_27963.p',axiom_16) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ l2(a,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SbJYTHYE5Z/E---3.1_27963.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( s1(X1)
| ~ q0(X1,X2)
| ~ s1(X3) ),
rule_126 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
axiom_17 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( s1(X1)
| ~ p0(X1,X1) ),
rule_125 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
axiom_14 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( s1(X1)
| ~ s1(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
s1(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
( l2(X1,X1)
| ~ p0(X2,X2)
| ~ s1(X3)
| ~ m0(X4,X3,X1) ),
rule_133 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
s1(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( l2(X1,X1)
| ~ p0(X2,X2)
| ~ m0(X3,X4,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
m0(c,b,a),
axiom_16 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ l2(a,a),
prove_this ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
~ p0(X1,X1),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.14 % Problem : SYN216-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.15/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:22:51 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SbJYTHYE5Z/E---3.1_27963.p
% 0.59/0.57 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.59/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.59/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.59/0.57 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.59/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.57 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.57 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.57 # new_bool_1 with pid 28043 completed with status 0
% 0.59/0.57 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.59/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.59/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.59/0.57 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.59/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.57 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.57 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.59/0.57 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.59/0.57 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.59/0.57 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.57 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 28050 completed with status 0
% 0.59/0.57 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.59/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.59/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.59/0.57 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.59/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.57 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.57 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.59/0.57 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.59/0.57 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.59/0.57 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.57 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.59/0.57 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.59/0.57
% 0.59/0.57 # Proof found!
% 0.59/0.57 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.59/0.57 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.59/0.57 # Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.59/0.57 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 55
% 0.59/0.57 # Initial clauses : 314
% 0.59/0.57 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.59/0.57 # Initial clauses in saturation : 309
% 0.59/0.57 # Processed clauses : 647
% 0.59/0.57 # ...of these trivial : 34
% 0.59/0.57 # ...subsumed : 22
% 0.59/0.57 # ...remaining for further processing : 591
% 0.59/0.57 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.59/0.57 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.59/0.57 # Backward-subsumed : 16
% 0.59/0.57 # Backward-rewritten : 119
% 0.59/0.57 # Generated clauses : 433
% 0.59/0.57 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 242
% 0.59/0.57 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.59/0.57 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.59/0.57 # Paramodulations : 433
% 0.59/0.57 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.59/0.57 # NegExts : 0
% 0.59/0.57 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.59/0.57 # Total rewrite steps : 482
% 0.59/0.57 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.59/0.57 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.59/0.57 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.59/0.57 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.59/0.57 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.59/0.57 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.59/0.57 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.59/0.57 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.59/0.57 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.59/0.57 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.59/0.57 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.59/0.57 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.59/0.57 # Current number of processed clauses : 182
% 0.59/0.57 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 89
% 0.59/0.57 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.59/0.57 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.59/0.57 # Non-unit-clauses : 91
% 0.59/0.57 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 154
% 0.59/0.57 # ...number of literals in the above : 455
% 0.59/0.57 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.59/0.57 # Current number of archived clauses : 409
% 0.59/0.57 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 20201
% 0.59/0.57 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14406
% 0.59/0.57 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 29
% 0.59/0.57 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 764
% 0.59/0.57 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.59/0.57 # BW rewrite match attempts : 170
% 0.59/0.57 # BW rewrite match successes : 87
% 0.59/0.57 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.59/0.57 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.59/0.57 # Termbank termtop insertions : 12872
% 0.59/0.57
% 0.59/0.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.57 # User time : 0.045 s
% 0.59/0.57 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.59/0.57 # Total time : 0.047 s
% 0.59/0.57 # Maximum resident set size: 2452 pages
% 0.59/0.57
% 0.59/0.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.57 # User time : 0.052 s
% 0.59/0.57 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.59/0.57 # Total time : 0.055 s
% 0.59/0.57 # Maximum resident set size: 2000 pages
% 0.59/0.57 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.59/0.57 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------