TSTP Solution File: SYN211-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SYN211-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.6vQ7lECGar true

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 04:02:12 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.55s 0.81s
% Output   : Refutation 1.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SYN211-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.6vQ7lECGar true
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 20:36:55 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.34  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.34  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.34  % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.61  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.61  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.61  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.68  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.21/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.55/0.81  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 1.55/0.81  % BCE start: 318
% 1.55/0.81  % BCE eliminated: 48
% 1.55/0.81  % PE start: 270
% 1.55/0.81  logic: neq
% 1.55/0.81  % PE eliminated: -75
% 1.55/0.81  % done 135 iterations in 0.087s
% 1.55/0.81  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.55/0.81  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.55/0.81  thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(p1_type, type, p1: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(l1_type, type, l1: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(s4_type, type, s4: $i > $o).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(n2_type, type, n2: $i > $o).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(p3_type, type, p3: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(n0_type, type, n0: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(rule_299, axiom,
% 1.55/0.81    (( s4 @ A ) | ( ~( p3 @ B @ C @ D ) ) | ( ~( l1 @ A @ C ) ))).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl299, plain,
% 1.55/0.81      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.55/0.81         ( (s4 @ X0) | ~ (p3 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3) | ~ (l1 @ X0 @ X2))),
% 1.55/0.81      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_299])).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(prove_this, conjecture, (s4 @ d)).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( s4 @ d )),
% 1.55/0.81    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl317, plain, (~ (s4 @ d)),
% 1.55/0.81      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl318, plain,
% 1.55/0.81      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: (~ (l1 @ d @ X0) | ~ (p3 @ X2 @ X0 @ X1))),
% 1.55/0.81      inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 1.55/0.81                [zip_derived_cl299, zip_derived_cl317])).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(axiom_34, axiom, (n0 @ c @ d)).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain, ( (n0 @ c @ d)),
% 1.55/0.81      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_34])).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(rule_066, axiom, (( p1 @ G @ G @ G ) | ( ~( n0 @ H @ G ) ))).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl103, plain,
% 1.55/0.81      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (p1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (n0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.55/0.81      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_066])).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl434, plain, ( (p1 @ d @ d @ d)),
% 1.55/0.81      inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 1.55/0.81                [zip_derived_cl33, zip_derived_cl103])).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(rule_137, axiom, (( n2 @ A ) | ( ~( p1 @ B @ C @ A ) ))).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl174, plain,
% 1.55/0.81      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ( (n2 @ X0) | ~ (p1 @ X1 @ X2 @ X0))),
% 1.55/0.81      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_137])).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(rule_244, axiom, (( p3 @ H @ H @ H ) | ( ~( n2 @ H ) ))).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl264, plain,
% 1.55/0.81      (![X0 : $i]: ( (p3 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (n2 @ X0))),
% 1.55/0.81      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_244])).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl357, plain,
% 1.55/0.81      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.55/0.81         (~ (p1 @ X2 @ X1 @ X0) |  (p3 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0))),
% 1.55/0.81      inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 1.55/0.81                [zip_derived_cl174, zip_derived_cl264])).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl609, plain, ( (p3 @ d @ d @ d)),
% 1.55/0.81      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl434, zip_derived_cl357])).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl617, plain, (~ (l1 @ d @ d)),
% 1.55/0.81      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl318, zip_derived_cl609])).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain, ( (n0 @ c @ d)),
% 1.55/0.81      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_34])).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(rule_002, axiom, (( l1 @ G @ G ) | ( ~( n0 @ H @ G ) ))).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl39, plain,
% 1.55/0.81      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (l1 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (n0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.55/0.81      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_002])).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl432, plain, ( (l1 @ d @ d)),
% 1.55/0.81      inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 1.55/0.81                [zip_derived_cl33, zip_derived_cl39])).
% 1.55/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl618, plain, ($false),
% 1.55/0.81      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl617, zip_derived_cl432])).
% 1.55/0.81  
% 1.55/0.81  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.55/0.81  
% 1.55/0.81  
% 1.55/0.81  % Terminating...
% 1.55/0.85  % Runner terminated.
% 1.55/0.86  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------