TSTP Solution File: SYN211-1 by Metis---2.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Metis---2.4
% Problem : SYN211-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 09:00:28 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 21 RR)
% Number of literals : 36 ( 0 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_1,axiom,
s0(d) ).
cnf(axiom_34,axiom,
n0(c,d) ).
cnf(rule_002,axiom,
( l1(G,G)
| ~ n0(H,G) ) ).
cnf(rule_072,axiom,
( p1(F,F,F)
| ~ s0(G)
| ~ s0(F) ) ).
cnf(rule_137,axiom,
( n2(A)
| ~ p1(B,C,A) ) ).
cnf(rule_244,axiom,
( p3(H,H,H)
| ~ n2(H) ) ).
cnf(rule_299,axiom,
( s4(A)
| ~ p3(B,C,D)
| ~ l1(A,C) ) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ s4(d) ).
cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
( ~ n0(c,d)
| l1(d,d) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_002:[bind(G,$fot(d)),bind(H,$fot(c))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
l1(d,d),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( n0(c,d) )],[axiom_34,refute_0_0]) ).
cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
( ~ n2(d)
| p3(d,d,d) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_244:[bind(H,$fot(d))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
( ~ s0(d)
| p1(d,d,d) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_072:[bind(F,$fot(d)),bind(G,$fot(d))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
p1(d,d,d),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( s0(d) )],[axiom_1,refute_0_3]) ).
cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
( ~ p1(d,d,d)
| n2(d) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_137:[bind(A,$fot(d)),bind(B,$fot(d)),bind(C,$fot(d))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
n2(d),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( p1(d,d,d) )],[refute_0_4,refute_0_5]) ).
cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
p3(d,d,d),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( n2(d) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_2]) ).
cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
( ~ l1(X_346,d)
| ~ p3(d,d,d)
| s4(X_346) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_299:[bind(A,$fot(X_346)),bind(B,$fot(d)),bind(C,$fot(d)),bind(D,$fot(d))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
( ~ l1(X_346,d)
| s4(X_346) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( p3(d,d,d) )],[refute_0_7,refute_0_8]) ).
cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
( ~ l1(d,d)
| s4(d) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_9:[bind(X_346,$fot(d))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
s4(d),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( l1(d,d) )],[refute_0_1,refute_0_10]) ).
cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
$false,
inference(resolve,[$cnf( s4(d) )],[refute_0_11,prove_this]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYN211-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 03:50:12 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.21/0.50 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.51
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------