TSTP Solution File: SYN203-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN203-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:29:34 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 16 unt; 0 nHn; 26 RR)
% Number of literals : 55 ( 0 equ; 27 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 11 ( 10 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 14 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_057,axiom,
( n1(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ r0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oadr1LK5cT/E---3.1_5897.p',rule_057) ).
cnf(axiom_9,axiom,
r0(b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oadr1LK5cT/E---3.1_5897.p',axiom_9) ).
cnf(rule_001,axiom,
( k1(X1)
| ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oadr1LK5cT/E---3.1_5897.p',rule_001) ).
cnf(axiom_7,axiom,
n0(d,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oadr1LK5cT/E---3.1_5897.p',axiom_7) ).
cnf(rule_179,axiom,
( q2(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ k1(X2)
| ~ n1(X1,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oadr1LK5cT/E---3.1_5897.p',rule_179) ).
cnf(rule_273,axiom,
( s3(X1,X2)
| ~ q2(X3,X1,X3)
| ~ s2(X1)
| ~ m0(X3,X4,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oadr1LK5cT/E---3.1_5897.p',rule_273) ).
cnf(axiom_19,axiom,
m0(X1,d,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oadr1LK5cT/E---3.1_5897.p',axiom_19) ).
cnf(rule_125,axiom,
( s1(X1)
| ~ p0(X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oadr1LK5cT/E---3.1_5897.p',rule_125) ).
cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oadr1LK5cT/E---3.1_5897.p',axiom_14) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ s3(X1,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oadr1LK5cT/E---3.1_5897.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(rule_189,axiom,
( s2(X1)
| ~ q2(b,X1,b)
| ~ s1(b) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oadr1LK5cT/E---3.1_5897.p',rule_189) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( n1(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ r0(X1) ),
rule_057 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
r0(b),
axiom_9 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
( k1(X1)
| ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
rule_001 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
n0(d,b),
axiom_7 ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
( q2(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ k1(X2)
| ~ n1(X1,X1,X2) ),
rule_179 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
n1(b,b,b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
k1(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
( s3(X1,X2)
| ~ q2(X3,X1,X3)
| ~ s2(X1)
| ~ m0(X3,X4,X2) ),
rule_273 ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
q2(b,b,b),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( s3(b,X1)
| ~ s2(b)
| ~ m0(b,X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
m0(X1,d,X2),
axiom_19 ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
( s1(X1)
| ~ p0(X1,X1) ),
rule_125 ).
cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
axiom_14 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ s3(X1,b),
prove_this ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( s3(b,X1)
| ~ s2(b) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
( s2(X1)
| ~ q2(b,X1,b)
| ~ s1(b) ),
rule_189 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
s1(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ s2(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( s2(X1)
| ~ q2(b,X1,b) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_19])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : SYN203-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:27:03 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.43 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oadr1LK5cT/E---3.1_5897.p
% 0.15/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.49 # new_bool_3 with pid 5975 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.49 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.49 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 5979 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.15/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.49 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.49
% 0.15/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.49 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.15/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 24
% 0.15/0.49 # Initial clauses : 345
% 0.15/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6
% 0.15/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 339
% 0.15/0.49 # Processed clauses : 742
% 0.15/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 36
% 0.15/0.49 # ...subsumed : 24
% 0.15/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 682
% 0.15/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 13
% 0.15/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 106
% 0.15/0.49 # Generated clauses : 538
% 0.15/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 357
% 0.15/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.15/0.49 # Paramodulations : 538
% 0.15/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 489
% 0.15/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 258
% 0.15/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 110
% 0.15/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 146
% 0.15/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 240
% 0.15/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 633
% 0.15/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 424
% 0.15/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 28751
% 0.15/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20572
% 0.15/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 32
% 0.15/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 629
% 0.15/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 140
% 0.15/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 72
% 0.15/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 14772
% 0.15/0.49
% 0.15/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.49 # User time : 0.044 s
% 0.15/0.49 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.49 # Total time : 0.048 s
% 0.15/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 2492 pages
% 0.15/0.49
% 0.15/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.49 # User time : 0.048 s
% 0.15/0.49 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.49 # Total time : 0.055 s
% 0.15/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1996 pages
% 0.15/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------