TSTP Solution File: SYN199-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN199-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 10:06:41 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 0 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 9 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_125,axiom,
( s1(X1)
| ~ p0(X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oVzBSZrjAT/E---3.1_28021.p',rule_125) ).
cnf(rule_126,axiom,
( s1(X1)
| ~ q0(X1,X2)
| ~ s1(X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oVzBSZrjAT/E---3.1_28021.p',rule_126) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ s1(d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oVzBSZrjAT/E---3.1_28021.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oVzBSZrjAT/E---3.1_28021.p',axiom_14) ).
cnf(axiom_33,axiom,
q0(d,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oVzBSZrjAT/E---3.1_28021.p',axiom_33) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( s1(X1)
| ~ p0(X1,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_125]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( s1(X1)
| ~ q0(X1,X2)
| ~ s1(X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_126]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ s1(d),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( s1(X1)
| ~ p0(X1,X1) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
axiom_14 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( s1(X1)
| ~ q0(X1,X2)
| ~ s1(X3) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
q0(d,c),
axiom_33 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ s1(d),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
s1(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
~ s1(X1),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.14 % Problem : SYN199-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.12/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.36 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 10:53:16 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oVzBSZrjAT/E---3.1_28021.p
% 0.22/0.55 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.22/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 28104 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.22/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.55 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.55 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 28109 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.22/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.55 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.55 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.55 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.55
% 0.22/0.55 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.55 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.55 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.55 # Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.22/0.55 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Initial clauses : 369
% 0.22/0.55 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 7
% 0.22/0.55 # Initial clauses in saturation : 362
% 0.22/0.55 # Processed clauses : 426
% 0.22/0.55 # ...of these trivial : 5
% 0.22/0.55 # ...subsumed : 23
% 0.22/0.55 # ...remaining for further processing : 398
% 0.22/0.55 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Backward-subsumed : 6
% 0.22/0.55 # Backward-rewritten : 7
% 0.22/0.55 # Generated clauses : 17
% 0.22/0.55 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13
% 0.22/0.55 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.22/0.55 # Paramodulations : 16
% 0.22/0.55 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Total rewrite steps : 77
% 0.22/0.55 # ...of those cached : 40
% 0.22/0.55 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55 # Current number of processed clauses : 57
% 0.22/0.55 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 38
% 0.22/0.55 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.55 # Non-unit-clauses : 18
% 0.22/0.55 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 276
% 0.22/0.55 # ...number of literals in the above : 815
% 0.22/0.55 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Current number of archived clauses : 341
% 0.22/0.55 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 23841
% 0.22/0.55 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15640
% 0.22/0.55 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 26
% 0.22/0.55 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 50
% 0.22/0.55 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # BW rewrite match attempts : 9
% 0.22/0.55 # BW rewrite match successes : 7
% 0.22/0.55 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Termbank termtop insertions : 12932
% 0.22/0.55 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1459
% 0.22/0.55
% 0.22/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.55 # User time : 0.023 s
% 0.22/0.55 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.55 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 0.22/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 2644 pages
% 0.22/0.55
% 0.22/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.55 # User time : 0.099 s
% 0.22/0.55 # System time : 0.017 s
% 0.22/0.55 # Total time : 0.116 s
% 0.22/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 2016 pages
% 0.22/0.55 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.55 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------