TSTP Solution File: SYN178-1 by Metis---2.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : SYN178-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 09:00:14 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.43s 0.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   43 (  23 unt;   0 nHn;  24 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   76 (   0 equ;  34 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  11 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   58 (  24 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_1,axiom,
    s0(d) ).

cnf(axiom_7,axiom,
    n0(d,b) ).

cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
    p0(b,X) ).

cnf(axiom_17,axiom,
    q0(X,d) ).

cnf(axiom_19,axiom,
    m0(X,d,Y) ).

cnf(axiom_32,axiom,
    k0(b) ).

cnf(rule_085,axiom,
    ( p1(B,B,B)
    | ~ p0(C,B) ) ).

cnf(rule_110,axiom,
    ( q1(B,B,B)
    | ~ m0(C,D,B) ) ).

cnf(rule_124,axiom,
    ( r1(D)
    | ~ q0(D,E)
    | ~ s0(d)
    | ~ q1(d,E,d) ) ).

cnf(rule_181,axiom,
    ( q2(I,I,I)
    | ~ p1(I,I,I) ) ).

cnf(rule_187,axiom,
    ( q2(C,D,C)
    | ~ r1(D)
    | ~ m0(E,F,C)
    | ~ k0(D)
    | ~ q2(D,D,D) ) ).

cnf(rule_255,axiom,
    ( q3(G,H)
    | ~ q2(I,G,H)
    | ~ n0(I,G) ) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ q3(b,d) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    ( ~ n0(X_1088,b)
    | ~ q2(X_1088,b,X_1088)
    | q3(b,X_1088) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_255:[bind(G,$fot(b)),bind(H,$fot(X_1088)),bind(I,$fot(X_1088))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    m0(X_1078,d,X_1076),
    inference(subst,[],[axiom_19:[bind(X,$fot(X_1078)),bind(Y,$fot(X_1076))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    ( ~ p1(X_69,X_69,X_69)
    | q2(X_69,X_69,X_69) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_181:[bind(I,$fot(X_69))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    p0(b,X_67),
    inference(subst,[],[axiom_14:[bind(X,$fot(X_67))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( ~ p0(b,X_67)
    | p1(X_67,X_67,X_67) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_085:[bind(B,$fot(X_67)),bind(C,$fot(b))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    p1(X_67,X_67,X_67),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( p0(b,X_67) )],[refute_0_3,refute_0_4]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    p1(X_69,X_69,X_69),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_5:[bind(X_67,$fot(X_69))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    q2(X_69,X_69,X_69),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( p1(X_69,X_69,X_69) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_2]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    q2(D,D,D),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_7:[bind(X_69,$fot(D))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ k0(D)
    | ~ m0(E,F,C)
    | ~ r1(D)
    | q2(C,D,C) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( q2(D,D,D) )],[refute_0_8,rule_187]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    q0(X_193,d),
    inference(subst,[],[axiom_17:[bind(X,$fot(X_193))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ q0(D,E)
    | ~ q1(d,E,d)
    | r1(D) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( s0(d) )],[axiom_1,rule_124]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ q0(X_193,d)
    | ~ q1(d,d,d)
    | r1(X_193) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_11:[bind(D,$fot(X_193)),bind(E,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ q1(d,d,d)
    | r1(X_193) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( q0(X_193,d) )],[refute_0_10,refute_0_12]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    m0(X_156,d,X_155),
    inference(subst,[],[axiom_19:[bind(X,$fot(X_156)),bind(Y,$fot(X_155))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ m0(X_156,d,X_155)
    | q1(X_155,X_155,X_155) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_110:[bind(B,$fot(X_155)),bind(C,$fot(X_156)),bind(D,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
    q1(X_155,X_155,X_155),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( m0(X_156,d,X_155) )],[refute_0_14,refute_0_15]) ).

cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
    q1(d,d,d),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_16:[bind(X_155,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
    r1(X_193),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( q1(d,d,d) )],[refute_0_17,refute_0_13]) ).

cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
    r1(D),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_18:[bind(X_193,$fot(D))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ k0(D)
    | ~ m0(E,F,C)
    | q2(C,D,C) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( r1(D) )],[refute_0_19,refute_0_9]) ).

cnf(refute_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ k0(X_1077)
    | ~ m0(X_1078,d,X_1076)
    | q2(X_1076,X_1077,X_1076) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_20:[bind(C,$fot(X_1076)),bind(D,$fot(X_1077)),bind(E,$fot(X_1078)),bind(F,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ k0(X_1077)
    | q2(X_1076,X_1077,X_1076) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( m0(X_1078,d,X_1076) )],[refute_0_1,refute_0_21]) ).

cnf(refute_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ k0(b)
    | q2(X_1083,b,X_1083) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_22:[bind(X_1076,$fot(X_1083)),bind(X_1077,$fot(b))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_24,plain,
    q2(X_1083,b,X_1083),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( k0(b) )],[axiom_32,refute_0_23]) ).

cnf(refute_0_25,plain,
    q2(X_1088,b,X_1088),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_24:[bind(X_1083,$fot(X_1088))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ n0(X_1088,b)
    | q3(b,X_1088) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( q2(X_1088,b,X_1088) )],[refute_0_25,refute_0_0]) ).

cnf(refute_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ n0(d,b)
    | q3(b,d) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_26:[bind(X_1088,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_28,plain,
    q3(b,d),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( n0(d,b) )],[axiom_7,refute_0_27]) ).

cnf(refute_0_29,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( q3(b,d) )],[refute_0_28,prove_this]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SYN178-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 20:15:04 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.43/0.60  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/0.60  
% 0.43/0.60  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.45/0.60  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------