TSTP Solution File: SYN175-1 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : SYN175-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 19:25:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   13 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   12 (   8   ~;   4   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (  10   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f385,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f381,f25]) ).

fof(f25,axiom,
    q0(d,d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_25) ).

fof(f381,plain,
    ~ q0(d,d),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f83,f379]) ).

fof(f379,plain,
    ! [X4,X5] : ~ n1(X4,d,X5),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f373,f17]) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ! [X0] : q0(X0,d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_17) ).

fof(f373,plain,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ~ n1(X4,d,X5)
      | ~ q0(X4,d) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f369,f216]) ).

fof(f216,axiom,
    ! [X11,X6,X7] :
      ( ~ n1(X6,X11,X7)
      | ~ q0(X6,X11)
      | q2(X11,X11,X11) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_178) ).

fof(f369,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : ~ q2(X0,d,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(f83,axiom,
    ( n1(d,d,d)
    | ~ q0(d,d) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_045) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SYN175-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 21:44:49 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.50  % (1896)lrs+1011_1:1_aac=none:bsr=unit_only:ep=R:sac=on:sos=all:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.21/0.50  % (1888)fmb+10_1:1_fmbes=contour:fmbsr=2.0:fmbsso=input_usage:i=6:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.21/0.51  % (1880)lrs+1010_1:4_amm=off:bce=on:sd=1:sos=on:ss=included:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.21/0.52  % (1880)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (1880)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52  % (1880)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.52  % (1880)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.52  % (1880)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.52  
% 0.21/0.52  % (1880)Memory used [KB]: 6140
% 0.21/0.52  % (1880)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.52  % (1880)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.21/0.52  % (1880)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52  % (1880)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52  % (1888)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.52  % (1888)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52  % (1888)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.52  % (1888)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.52  % (1888)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.52  % (1888)Termination phase: Finite model building preprocessing
% 0.21/0.52  
% 0.21/0.52  % (1888)Memory used [KB]: 1918
% 0.21/0.52  % (1888)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.52  % (1888)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.21/0.52  % (1896)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.52  % (1885)lrs+10_1:1_drc=off:sp=reverse_frequency:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=5:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/5Mi)
% 0.21/0.52  % (1888)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52  % (1888)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52  % (1884)dis+4_1:1_bd=off:cond=fast:fde=unused:lcm=reverse:lma=on:nicw=on:nwc=2.0:s2a=on:s2agt=16:sac=on:sp=frequency:i=23:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/23Mi)
% 0.21/0.52  % (1896)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.52  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.52  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.52  % (1896)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52  % (1896)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.52  % (1896)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.52  % (1896)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.52  
% 0.21/0.52  % (1896)Memory used [KB]: 6652
% 0.21/0.52  % (1896)Time elapsed: 0.064 s
% 0.21/0.52  % (1896)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.21/0.52  % (1896)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52  % (1896)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52  % (1872)Success in time 0.17 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------