TSTP Solution File: SYN175-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN175-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:10:41 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.66s 4.89s
% Output : Refutation 4.66s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : SYN175-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.31 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.31 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 13:01:19 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.34 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.16/0.34 The process was started by sandbox on n014.cluster.edu,
% 0.16/0.34 Mon Jul 11 13:01:19 2022
% 0.16/0.34 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 26031.
% 0.16/0.34
% 0.16/0.34 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.16/0.34 set(auto).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.16/0.34 clear(print_given).
% 0.16/0.34
% 0.16/0.34 list(usable).
% 0.16/0.34
% 0.16/0.34 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.16/0.34
% 0.16/0.34 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.16/0.34 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.16/0.34 in usable.
% 0.16/0.34
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.16/0.34 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.16/0.34
% 0.16/0.34 ------------> process usable:
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [] {-} m1(A,A,A)| -q0(B,C)| -q0(B,A).
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [] {-} m1(A,A,A)| -m0(B,C,A).
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [] {-} m1(A,A,A)| -l0(A)| -k0(A)| -m0(A,A,A).
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} m1(e,e,e)| -r0(e).
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p1(A,A,A)| -n0(e,b)| -k0(b)| -k0(A)| -k1(B).
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 64 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p1(A,A,B)| -p0(B,A)| -r0(A).
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p1(e,e,e)| -r0(e)| -k0(e).
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 88 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -s0(A)| -m0(B,B,C).
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 88 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -s0(A).
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 88 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(d,d,d)| -k0(e)| -s0(d).
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 105 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(b,b,b)| -r0(b).
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 99 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -m0(B,C,A).
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 99 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -m0(A,B,A).
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 105 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -m0(c,A,A)| -r0(A).
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 142 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p2(A,A,A)| -s1(A)| -k1(A).
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 224 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p3(A,A,A)| -n2(A)| -q2(B,C,A)| -s1(B).
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 224 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p3(A,A,A)| -k1(A)| -n2(A).
% 0.16/0.34 13 back subsumes 9.
% 0.16/0.34 14 back subsumes 6.
% 0.16/0.34 28 back subsumes 21.
% 0.16/0.34 28 back subsumes 17.
% 0.16/0.34 40 back subsumes 39.
% 0.16/0.34 52 back subsumes 51.
% 0.16/0.34 77 back subsumes 68.
% 0.16/0.34 77 back subsumes 65.
% 0.16/0.34 142 back subsumes 134.
% 0.16/0.34 194 back subsumes 180.
% 0.16/0.34 216 back subsumes 213.
% 0.16/0.34 216 back subsumes 212.
% 0.16/0.34 244 back subsumes 239.
% 0.16/0.34 307 back subsumes 223.
% 0.16/0.34 307 back subsumes 221.
% 0.16/0.34
% 0.16/0.34 ------------> process sos:
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 321 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p0(b,c).
% 0.16/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 324 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q0(d,d).
% 0.16/0.34 321 back subsumes 317.
% 0.16/0.34 324 back subsumes 309.
% 0.16/0.34 326 back subsumes 315.
% 0.16/0.34 326 back subsumes 311.
% 0.16/0.34
% 0.16/0.34 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.16/0.41 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.16/0.41 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.16/0.41 number of clauses in intial UL: 292
% 0.16/0.41 number of clauses initially in problem: 324
% 0.16/0.41 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 90
% 0.16/0.41 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.16/0.41 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.16/0.41 absolute distinct symbol count: 53
% 0.16/0.41 distinct predicate count: 48
% 0.16/0.41 distinct function count: 0
% 0.16/0.41 distinct constant count: 5
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41 =========== start of search ===========
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 -------- PROOF --------
% 4.66/4.89 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.66/4.89 % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 2 [ 1 3 7894 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 3 [ 1 2 5490 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 4 [ 2 2 6793 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 5 [ 3 2 4731 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 6 [ 4 3 11260 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 7 [ 5 1 4283 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 8 [ 1 3 11529 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 9 [ 7 2 5136 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 10 [ 4 2 10426 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 11 [ 7 1 5846 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 12 [ 9 2 4432 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 13 [ 6 3 12916 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 14 [ 11 1 5399 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 15 [ 16 2 6534 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 16 [ 17 2 6029 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 17 [ 13 2 10829 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 18 [ 14 2 6271 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 19 [ 17 3 13419 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 20 [ 18 3 12933 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 21 [ 21 2 4668 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 22 [ 23 1 3462 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 23 [ 19 2 9447 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 24 [ 33 2 7717 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 25 [ 22 2 8167 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 4.52 sec ----> 436 [binary,435.1,307.1] {+} $F.
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Length of proof is 2. Level of proof is 2.
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 4.66/4.89 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.66/4.89 % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 3 [] {+} l1(A,B)| -p0(C,A)| -r0(D)| -m0(B,A,C).
% 4.66/4.89 168 [] {+} q2(A,A,B)| -l1(B,A).
% 4.66/4.89 307 [] {+} -q2(A,d,B).
% 4.66/4.89 320 [] {+} r0(e).
% 4.66/4.89 321 [] {-} p0(b,A).
% 4.66/4.89 326 [] {+} m0(A,d,B).
% 4.66/4.89 426 [hyper,326,3,321,320] {-} l1(d,A).
% 4.66/4.89 435 [hyper,426,168] {-} q2(A,A,d).
% 4.66/4.89 436 [binary,435.1,307.1] {+} $F.
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 % SZS output end Refutation
% 4.66/4.89 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 ============ end of search ============
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 true clauses given 6 (17.1%)
% 4.66/4.89 false clauses given 29
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 FALSE TRUE
% 4.66/4.89 3 0 5
% 4.66/4.89 4 15 35
% 4.66/4.89 tot: 15 40 (72.7% true)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Model 25 [ 22 -13 8167 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 4.66/4.89
% 4.66/4.89 Process 26031 finished Mon Jul 11 13:01:24 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------