TSTP Solution File: SYN173-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN173-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:14:00 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.37s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 16 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 7 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_092,axiom,
( q1(X1,X2,X1)
| ~ n0(X3,X2)
| ~ p0(X4,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9r1odkKLuG/E---3.1_30331.p',rule_092) ).
cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9r1odkKLuG/E---3.1_30331.p',axiom_14) ).
cnf(axiom_37,axiom,
n0(b,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9r1odkKLuG/E---3.1_30331.p',axiom_37) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ q1(e,a,e),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9r1odkKLuG/E---3.1_30331.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( q1(X1,X2,X1)
| ~ n0(X3,X2)
| ~ p0(X4,X1) ),
rule_092 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
axiom_14 ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( q1(X1,X2,X1)
| ~ n0(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
n0(b,a),
axiom_37 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ q1(e,a,e),
prove_this ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
q1(X1,a,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14 % Problem : SYN173-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.07/0.16 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.17/0.37 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.37 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.17/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:28:14 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.35/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.35/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9r1odkKLuG/E---3.1_30331.p
% 0.37/0.59 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.37/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.59 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.59 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.59 # new_bool_1 with pid 30483 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.59 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.37/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.59 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.59 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.37/0.59 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.59 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.37/0.59 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.59 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 30486 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.59 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.37/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.59 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.59 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.37/0.59 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.59 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.37/0.59 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.59 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.37/0.59 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.37/0.59
% 0.37/0.59 # Proof found!
% 0.37/0.59 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.37/0.59 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/0.59 # Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.37/0.59 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 160
% 0.37/0.59 # Initial clauses : 209
% 0.37/0.59 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.37/0.59 # Initial clauses in saturation : 204
% 0.37/0.59 # Processed clauses : 535
% 0.37/0.59 # ...of these trivial : 28
% 0.37/0.59 # ...subsumed : 22
% 0.37/0.59 # ...remaining for further processing : 485
% 0.37/0.59 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.37/0.59 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.37/0.59 # Backward-subsumed : 22
% 0.37/0.59 # Backward-rewritten : 89
% 0.37/0.59 # Generated clauses : 677
% 0.37/0.59 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 431
% 0.37/0.59 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.37/0.59 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.37/0.59 # Paramodulations : 677
% 0.37/0.59 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.37/0.59 # NegExts : 0
% 0.37/0.59 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.37/0.59 # Total rewrite steps : 521
% 0.37/0.59 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.37/0.59 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.37/0.59 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.37/0.59 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.37/0.59 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.37/0.59 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.37/0.59 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.59 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.59 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.59 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.59 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.59 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.59 # Current number of processed clauses : 197
% 0.37/0.59 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 98
% 0.37/0.59 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.37/0.59 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.37/0.59 # Non-unit-clauses : 99
% 0.37/0.59 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 229
% 0.37/0.59 # ...number of literals in the above : 512
% 0.37/0.59 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.37/0.59 # Current number of archived clauses : 288
% 0.37/0.59 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12879
% 0.37/0.59 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9356
% 0.37/0.59 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 41
% 0.37/0.59 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 566
% 0.37/0.59 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.37/0.59 # BW rewrite match attempts : 216
% 0.37/0.59 # BW rewrite match successes : 53
% 0.37/0.59 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.37/0.59 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.37/0.59 # Termbank termtop insertions : 13807
% 0.37/0.59
% 0.37/0.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.59 # User time : 0.038 s
% 0.37/0.59 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.37/0.59 # Total time : 0.041 s
% 0.37/0.59 # Maximum resident set size: 2300 pages
% 0.37/0.59
% 0.37/0.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.59 # User time : 0.044 s
% 0.37/0.59 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.37/0.59 # Total time : 0.050 s
% 0.37/0.59 # Maximum resident set size: 1996 pages
% 0.37/0.59 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.37/0.59 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------