TSTP Solution File: SYN170-10 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SYN170-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nZDaJHCgX3 true
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 04:02:01 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.39s 0.84s
% Output : Refutation 1.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SYN170-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nZDaJHCgX3 true
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 18:20:12 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.36 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.22/0.63 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.22/0.63 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.22/0.63 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.22/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.28/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 1.28/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.28/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.28/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.28/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.36/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 1.39/0.84 % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 1.39/0.84 % BCE start: 343
% 1.39/0.84 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 1.39/0.84 % PE start: 343
% 1.39/0.84 logic: eq
% 1.39/0.84 % PE eliminated: 0
% 1.39/0.84 % done 211 iterations in 0.102s
% 1.39/0.84 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.39/0.84 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.39/0.84 thf(p1_type, type, p1: $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(n2_type, type, n2: $i > $i).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(true_type, type, true: $i).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(n0_type, type, n0: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(ifeq_type, type, ifeq: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(p4_type, type, p4: $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(k3_type, type, k3: $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(axiom_26, axiom, (( n0 @ d @ c ) = ( true ))).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(zip_derived_cl26, plain, (((n0 @ d @ c) = (true))),
% 1.39/0.84 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_26])).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(rule_066, axiom,
% 1.39/0.84 (( ifeq @ ( n0 @ H @ G ) @ true @ ( p1 @ G @ G @ G ) @ true ) = ( true ))).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(zip_derived_cl103, plain,
% 1.39/0.84 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.39/0.84 ((ifeq @ (n0 @ X0 @ X1) @ true @ (p1 @ X1 @ X1 @ X1) @ true) = (true))),
% 1.39/0.84 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_066])).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(zip_derived_cl476, plain,
% 1.39/0.84 (((ifeq @ true @ true @ (p1 @ c @ c @ c) @ true) = (true))),
% 1.39/0.84 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl26, zip_derived_cl103])).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(ifeq_axiom, axiom, (( ifeq @ A @ A @ B @ C ) = ( B ))).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.39/0.84 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ((ifeq @ X1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2) = (X0))),
% 1.39/0.84 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ifeq_axiom])).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(zip_derived_cl489, plain, (((true) = (p1 @ c @ c @ c))),
% 1.39/0.84 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl476, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(rule_137, axiom,
% 1.39/0.84 (( ifeq @ ( p1 @ B @ C @ A ) @ true @ ( n2 @ A ) @ true ) = ( true ))).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(zip_derived_cl172, plain,
% 1.39/0.84 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.39/0.84 ((ifeq @ (p1 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2) @ true @ (n2 @ X2) @ true) = (true))),
% 1.39/0.84 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_137])).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(zip_derived_cl494, plain,
% 1.39/0.84 (((ifeq @ true @ true @ (n2 @ c) @ true) = (true))),
% 1.39/0.84 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl489, zip_derived_cl172])).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.39/0.84 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ((ifeq @ X1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2) = (X0))),
% 1.39/0.84 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ifeq_axiom])).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(zip_derived_cl538, plain, (((true) = (n2 @ c))),
% 1.39/0.84 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl494, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(rule_210, axiom,
% 1.39/0.84 (( ifeq @ ( n2 @ D ) @ true @ ( k3 @ D @ D @ D ) @ true ) = ( true ))).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(zip_derived_cl241, plain,
% 1.39/0.84 (![X0 : $i]:
% 1.39/0.84 ((ifeq @ (n2 @ X0) @ true @ (k3 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) @ true) = (true))),
% 1.39/0.84 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_210])).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(zip_derived_cl541, plain,
% 1.39/0.84 (((ifeq @ true @ true @ (k3 @ c @ c @ c) @ true) = (true))),
% 1.39/0.84 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl538, zip_derived_cl241])).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.39/0.84 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ((ifeq @ X1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2) = (X0))),
% 1.39/0.84 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ifeq_axiom])).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(zip_derived_cl633, plain, (((true) = (k3 @ c @ c @ c))),
% 1.39/0.84 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl541, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(rule_287, axiom,
% 1.39/0.84 (( ifeq @ ( k3 @ B @ B @ C ) @ true @ ( p4 @ B @ C @ B ) @ true ) =
% 1.39/0.84 ( true ))).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(zip_derived_cl314, plain,
% 1.39/0.84 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.39/0.84 ((ifeq @ (k3 @ X0 @ X0 @ X1) @ true @ (p4 @ X0 @ X1 @ X0) @ true)
% 1.39/0.84 = (true))),
% 1.39/0.84 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_287])).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(zip_derived_cl717, plain,
% 1.39/0.84 (((ifeq @ true @ true @ (p4 @ c @ c @ c) @ true) = (true))),
% 1.39/0.84 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl633, zip_derived_cl314])).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.39/0.84 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ((ifeq @ X1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2) = (X0))),
% 1.39/0.84 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ifeq_axiom])).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(zip_derived_cl742, plain, (((true) = (p4 @ c @ c @ c))),
% 1.39/0.84 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl717, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(prove_this, conjecture, (( p4 @ X @ c @ Y ) = ( true ))).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( p4 @ X @ c @ Y ) != ( true )),
% 1.39/0.84 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(zip_derived_cl342, plain,
% 1.39/0.84 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((p4 @ X0 @ c @ X1) != (true))),
% 1.39/0.84 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.39/0.84 thf(zip_derived_cl743, plain, ($false),
% 1.39/0.84 inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 1.39/0.84 [zip_derived_cl742, zip_derived_cl342])).
% 1.39/0.84
% 1.39/0.84 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.39/0.84
% 1.39/0.84
% 1.39/0.84 % Terminating...
% 1.83/0.94 % Runner terminated.
% 1.83/0.96 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------