TSTP Solution File: SYN170-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SYN170-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PgOK1qfdv2 true
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 04:02:02 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.82s
% Output : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN170-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PgOK1qfdv2 true
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 18:19:48 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.55/0.64 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.55/0.64 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.55/0.64 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.55/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.55/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.55/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.55/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.82 % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.56/0.82 % BCE start: 347
% 0.56/0.82 % BCE eliminated: 27
% 0.56/0.82 % PE start: 320
% 0.56/0.82 logic: neq
% 0.56/0.82 % PE eliminated: -45
% 0.56/0.82 % done 136 iterations in 0.092s
% 0.56/0.82 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.56/0.82 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.56/0.82 thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(p1_type, type, p1: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(n2_type, type, n2: $i > $o).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(p3_type, type, p3: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(n0_type, type, n0: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(p4_type, type, p4: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(axiom_26, axiom, (n0 @ d @ c)).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain, ( (n0 @ d @ c)),
% 0.56/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_26])).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(rule_066, axiom, (( p1 @ G @ G @ G ) | ( ~( n0 @ H @ G ) ))).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl103, plain,
% 0.56/0.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (p1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (n0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.56/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_066])).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl635, plain, ( (p1 @ c @ c @ c)),
% 0.56/0.82 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl25, zip_derived_cl103])).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(rule_137, axiom, (( n2 @ A ) | ( ~( p1 @ B @ C @ A ) ))).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl174, plain,
% 0.56/0.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ( (n2 @ X0) | ~ (p1 @ X1 @ X2 @ X0))),
% 0.56/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_137])).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(rule_244, axiom, (( p3 @ H @ H @ H ) | ( ~( n2 @ H ) ))).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl279, plain,
% 0.56/0.82 (![X0 : $i]: ( (p3 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (n2 @ X0))),
% 0.56/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_244])).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl405, plain,
% 0.56/0.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.82 (~ (p1 @ X2 @ X1 @ X0) | (p3 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0))),
% 0.56/0.82 inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 0.56/0.82 [zip_derived_cl174, zip_derived_cl279])).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl724, plain, ( (p3 @ c @ c @ c)),
% 0.56/0.82 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl635, zip_derived_cl405])).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(rule_291, axiom, (( p4 @ I @ I @ I ) | ( ~( p3 @ J @ J @ I ) ))).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl322, plain,
% 0.56/0.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (p4 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (p3 @ X1 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.56/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_291])).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl727, plain, ( (p4 @ c @ c @ c)),
% 0.56/0.82 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl724, zip_derived_cl322])).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(prove_this, conjecture, (p4 @ X @ c @ Y)).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( p4 @ X @ c @ Y )),
% 0.56/0.82 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl346, plain, (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ~ (p4 @ X0 @ c @ X1)),
% 0.56/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.56/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl729, plain, ($false),
% 0.56/0.82 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl727, zip_derived_cl346])).
% 0.56/0.82
% 0.56/0.82 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.56/0.82
% 0.56/0.82
% 0.56/0.82 % Terminating...
% 0.56/0.86 % Runner terminated.
% 1.83/0.87 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------