TSTP Solution File: SYN167-1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SYN167-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 19:37:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.51s 0.55s
% Output : Refutation 1.51s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 6 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 2 ~; 1 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 3 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f418,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f417,f369]) ).
fof(f369,axiom,
! [X0] : ~ p1(d,X0,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
fof(f417,plain,
p1(d,d,d),
inference(resolution,[],[f104,f34]) ).
fof(f34,axiom,
n0(c,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_34) ).
fof(f104,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( ~ n0(X5,X4)
| p1(X4,X4,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_066) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN167-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 21:49:06 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.51 % (21685)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.20/0.52 % (21694)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 0.20/0.53 % (21673)ott+10_1:32_abs=on:br=off:urr=ec_only:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 1.27/0.53 % (21676)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 1.27/0.53 % (21678)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 1.27/0.53 % (21675)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 1.27/0.53 % (21677)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=48:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/48Mi)
% 1.27/0.54 % (21684)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 1.27/0.54 % (21687)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 1.27/0.54 % (21695)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/467Mi)
% 1.27/0.54 % (21672)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/191324Mi)
% 1.27/0.54 % (21699)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=177:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/177Mi)
% 1.27/0.54 % (21688)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 1.27/0.54 % (21686)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 1.27/0.54 % (21690)ott+10_1:1_tgt=ground:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 1.27/0.54 % (21696)ott+10_1:1_kws=precedence:tgt=ground:i=482:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/482Mi)
% 1.27/0.54 % (21701)ott+10_7:2_awrs=decay:awrsf=8:bd=preordered:drc=off:fd=preordered:fde=unused:fsr=off:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsqr=5,8:sp=const_min:spb=units:to=lpo:i=355:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/355Mi)
% 1.27/0.54 % (21679)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 1.27/0.54 % (21691)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:rp=on:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 1.27/0.54 % (21694)First to succeed.
% 1.27/0.55 % (21682)ott+2_1:1_fsr=off:gsp=on:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 1.27/0.55 % (21700)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=439:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/439Mi)
% 1.51/0.55 % (21693)ott+3_1:1_gsp=on:lcm=predicate:i=138:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/138Mi)
% 1.51/0.55 % (21694)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.51/0.55 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 1.51/0.55 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 1.51/0.55 % (21694)------------------------------
% 1.51/0.55 % (21694)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 1.51/0.55 % (21694)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 1.51/0.55 % (21694)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.51/0.55
% 1.51/0.55 % (21694)Memory used [KB]: 1407
% 1.51/0.55 % (21694)Time elapsed: 0.128 s
% 1.51/0.55 % (21694)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 1.51/0.55 % (21694)------------------------------
% 1.51/0.55 % (21694)------------------------------
% 1.51/0.55 % (21671)Success in time 0.203 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------