TSTP Solution File: SYN155-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SYN155-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:10:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.74s
% Output   : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SYN155-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 01:17:39 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.37  The process was started by sandbox2 on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.37  Tue Jul 12 01:17:39 2022
% 0.20/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 16531.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  list(usable).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.20/0.37  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.20/0.37  in usable.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [] {-} m1(A,A,A)| -q0(B,C)| -q0(B,A).
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [] {-} m1(A,A,A)| -m0(B,C,A).
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [] {-} m1(A,A,A)| -l0(A)| -k0(A)| -m0(A,A,A).
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} m1(e,e,e)| -r0(e).
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p1(A,A,A)| -n0(e,b)| -k0(b)| -k0(A)| -k1(B).
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 64 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p1(A,A,B)| -p0(B,A)| -r0(A).
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p1(e,e,e)| -r0(e)| -k0(e).
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 88 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -s0(A)| -m0(B,B,C).
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 88 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -s0(A).
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 88 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(d,d,d)| -k0(e)| -s0(d).
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 105 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(b,b,b)| -r0(b).
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 99 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -m0(B,C,A).
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 99 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -m0(A,B,A).
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 105 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -m0(c,A,A)| -r0(A).
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 142 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p2(A,A,A)| -s1(A)| -k1(A).
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 224 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p3(A,A,A)| -n2(A)| -q2(B,C,A)| -s1(B).
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 224 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p3(A,A,A)| -k1(A)| -n2(A).
% 0.20/0.37  13 back subsumes 9.
% 0.20/0.37  14 back subsumes 6.
% 0.20/0.37  28 back subsumes 21.
% 0.20/0.37  28 back subsumes 17.
% 0.20/0.37  40 back subsumes 39.
% 0.20/0.37  52 back subsumes 51.
% 0.20/0.37  77 back subsumes 68.
% 0.20/0.37  77 back subsumes 65.
% 0.20/0.37  142 back subsumes 134.
% 0.20/0.37  194 back subsumes 180.
% 0.20/0.37  216 back subsumes 213.
% 0.20/0.37  216 back subsumes 212.
% 0.20/0.37  244 back subsumes 239.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 321 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p0(b,c).
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 324 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q0(d,d).
% 0.20/0.37  321 back subsumes 317.
% 0.20/0.37  324 back subsumes 309.
% 0.20/0.37  326 back subsumes 315.
% 0.20/0.37  326 back subsumes 311.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.55/0.73  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.55/0.73  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.55/0.73  number of clauses in intial UL: 294
% 0.55/0.73  number of clauses initially in problem: 326
% 0.55/0.73  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 90
% 0.55/0.73  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.55/0.73  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.55/0.73  absolute distinct symbol count: 53
% 0.55/0.73     distinct predicate count: 48
% 0.55/0.73     distinct function count: 0
% 0.55/0.73     distinct constant count: 5
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.55/0.74  
% 0.55/0.74  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.55/0.74  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.55/0.74  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.55/0.74  
% 0.55/0.74  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.35 sec ----> 670 [binary,669.1,307.1] {+} $F.
% 0.55/0.74  
% 0.55/0.74  Length of proof is 13.  Level of proof is 5.
% 0.55/0.74  
% 0.55/0.74  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.55/0.74  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.55/0.74  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.55/0.74  
% 0.55/0.74  3 [] {+} l1(A,B)| -p0(C,A)| -r0(D)| -m0(B,A,C).
% 0.55/0.74  109 [] {+} s1(A)| -p0(A,A).
% 0.55/0.74  110 [] {+} s1(A)| -q0(A,B)| -s1(C).
% 0.55/0.74  116 [] {+} l2(A,A)| -p0(B,B)| -s1(C)| -m0(D,C,A).
% 0.55/0.74  157 [] {+} p2(A,A,A)| -l1(B,A).
% 0.55/0.74  168 [] {+} q2(A,A,B)| -l1(B,A).
% 0.55/0.74  172 [] {+} s2(d)| -s1(a)| -s0(d).
% 0.55/0.74  205 [] {+} m3(A,B,A)| -m0(C,C,B)| -l2(D,A)| -m0(A,D,D)| -s2(C).
% 0.55/0.74  220 [] {+} n3(A)| -p2(B,C,A).
% 0.55/0.74  233 [] {+} q3(A,B)| -q2(C,A,B)| -n0(C,A).
% 0.55/0.74  252 [] {+} k4(c)| -n0(c,d)| -q3(e,b)| -n3(e).
% 0.55/0.74  260 [] {+} n4(A,A)| -k4(B)| -m3(A,A,A).
% 0.55/0.74  307 [] {+} -n4(A,a).
% 0.55/0.74  308 [] {-} s0(d).
% 0.55/0.74  319 [] {-} m0(a,A,a).
% 0.55/0.74  320 [] {-} r0(e).
% 0.55/0.74  321 [] {-} p0(b,A).
% 0.55/0.74  324 [] {-} q0(A,d).
% 0.55/0.74  325 [] {-} p0(c,b).
% 0.55/0.74  326 [] {-} m0(A,d,B).
% 0.55/0.74  332 [] {-} m0(e,b,c).
% 0.55/0.74  335 [] {-} n0(e,e).
% 0.55/0.74  339 [] {-} n0(c,d).
% 0.55/0.74  380 [hyper,321,109] {-} s1(b).
% 0.55/0.74  398 [hyper,324,110,380] {-} s1(A).
% 0.55/0.74  402 [hyper,398,172,308] {-} s2(d).
% 0.55/0.74  407 [hyper,326,116,321,398] {-} l2(A,A).
% 0.55/0.74  416 [hyper,326,3,321,320] {-} l1(d,A).
% 0.55/0.74  434 [hyper,332,3,325,320] {-} l1(b,e).
% 0.55/0.74  460 [hyper,407,205,326,319,402] {-} m3(a,A,a).
% 0.55/0.74  473 [hyper,416,157] {-} p2(A,A,A).
% 0.55/0.74  475 [hyper,434,168] {-} q2(e,e,b).
% 0.55/0.74  648 [hyper,473,220] {-} n3(A).
% 0.55/0.74  666 [hyper,475,233,335] {-} q3(e,b).
% 0.55/0.74  667 [hyper,666,252,339,648] {-} k4(c).
% 0.55/0.74  669 [hyper,667,260,460] {-} n4(a,a).
% 0.55/0.74  670 [binary,669.1,307.1] {+} $F.
% 0.55/0.74  
% 0.55/0.74  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.55/0.74  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.55/0.74  
% 0.55/0.74  
% 0.55/0.74  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.55/0.74  
% 0.55/0.74  
% 0.55/0.74  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.55/0.74  
% 0.55/0.74  ============ end of search ============
% 0.55/0.74  
% 0.55/0.74  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.55/0.74  
% 0.55/0.74  Process 16531 finished Tue Jul 12 01:17:39 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------