TSTP Solution File: SYN151-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN151-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:29:25 EDT 2023
% Result : Timeout 0.60s 300.20s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 14 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 8 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_067,axiom,
( p1(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ q0(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JisAvLsvPy/E---3.1_28686.p',rule_067) ).
cnf(axiom_17,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JisAvLsvPy/E---3.1_28686.p',axiom_17) ).
cnf(rule_137,axiom,
( n2(X1)
| ~ p1(X2,X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JisAvLsvPy/E---3.1_28686.p',rule_137) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ n2(d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JisAvLsvPy/E---3.1_28686.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( p1(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ q0(X2,X1) ),
rule_067 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
axiom_17 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
( n2(X1)
| ~ p1(X2,X3,X1) ),
rule_137 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
p1(d,d,d),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ n2(d),
prove_this ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SYN151-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:18:51 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JisAvLsvPy/E---3.1_28686.p
% 0.60/300.20 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.60/300.20 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.60/300.20 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.60/300.20 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.60/300.20 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.60/300.20 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.60/300.20 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.60/300.20 # new_bool_3 with pid 28764 completed with status 0
% 0.60/300.20 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.60/300.20 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.60/300.20 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.60/300.20 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.60/300.20 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.60/300.20 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.60/300.20 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.60/300.20 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.60/300.20 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.60/300.20 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 28772 completed with status 0
% 0.60/300.20 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.60/300.20 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.60/300.20 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.60/300.20 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.60/300.20 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.60/300.20 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.60/300.20 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.60/300.20 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.60/300.20 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.60/300.20 # Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.60/300.20 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.60/300.20
% 0.60/300.20 # Proof found!
% 0.60/300.20 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.60/300.20 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.60/300.20 # Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.60/300.20 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 41
% 0.60/300.20 # Initial clauses : 328
% 0.60/300.20 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.60/300.20 # Initial clauses in saturation : 323
% 0.60/300.20 # Processed clauses : 475
% 0.60/300.20 # ...of these trivial : 12
% 0.60/300.20 # ...subsumed : 22
% 0.60/300.20 # ...remaining for further processing : 441
% 0.60/300.20 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.60/300.20 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.60/300.20 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.60/300.20 # Backward-rewritten : 20
% 0.60/300.20 # Generated clauses : 98
% 0.60/300.20 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 71
% 0.60/300.20 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.60/300.20 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.60/300.20 # Paramodulations : 98
% 0.60/300.20 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.60/300.20 # NegExts : 0
% 0.60/300.20 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.60/300.20 # Total rewrite steps : 125
% 0.60/300.20 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.60/300.20 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.60/300.20 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.60/300.20 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.60/300.20 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.60/300.20 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.60/300.20 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.60/300.20 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.60/300.20 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.60/300.20 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.60/300.20 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.60/300.20 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.60/300.20 # Current number of processed clauses : 128
% 0.60/300.20 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 73
% 0.60/300.20 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.60/300.20 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.60/300.20 # Non-unit-clauses : 54
% 0.60/300.20 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 205
% 0.60/300.20 # ...number of literals in the above : 625
% 0.60/300.20 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.60/300.20 # Current number of archived clauses : 313
% 0.60/300.20 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 18082
% 0.60/300.20 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11904
% 0.60/300.20 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 27
% 0.60/300.20 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 119
% 0.60/300.20 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.60/300.20 # BW rewrite match attempts : 23
% 0.60/300.20 # BW rewrite match successes : 18
% 0.60/300.20 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.60/300.20 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.60/300.20 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9523
% 0.60/300.20
% 0.60/300.20 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/300.20 # User time : 0.035 s
% 0.60/300.20 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.60/300.20 # Total time : 0.039 s
% 0.60/300.20 # Maximum resident set size: 2468 pages
% 0.60/300.20
% 0.60/300.20 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/300.20 # User time : 0.042 s
% 0.60/300.20 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.60/300.20 # Total time : 0.047 s
% 0.60/300.20 # Maximum resident set size: 1996 pages
% 0.60/300.20 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------