TSTP Solution File: SYN151-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SYN151-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:13:56 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.55s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   14 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_067,axiom,
    ( p1(X1,X1,X1)
    | ~ q0(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3jizSeakTD/E---3.1_12459.p',rule_067) ).

cnf(axiom_17,axiom,
    q0(X1,d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3jizSeakTD/E---3.1_12459.p',axiom_17) ).

cnf(rule_137,axiom,
    ( n2(X1)
    | ~ p1(X2,X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3jizSeakTD/E---3.1_12459.p',rule_137) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ n2(d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3jizSeakTD/E---3.1_12459.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    ( p1(X1,X1,X1)
    | ~ q0(X2,X1) ),
    rule_067 ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    q0(X1,d),
    axiom_17 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    ( n2(X1)
    | ~ p1(X2,X3,X1) ),
    rule_137 ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    p1(d,d,d),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ n2(d),
    prove_this ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.14  % Problem    : SYN151-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.11/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 18:00:20 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.50  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3jizSeakTD/E---3.1_12459.p
% 0.21/0.55  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.55  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.55  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.55  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.55  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.55  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.55  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.55  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 12537 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.55  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.21/0.55  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.55  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.55  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.55  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.55  # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.55  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.55  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.55  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.55  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.55  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.55  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.55  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 12542 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.55  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.55  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.55  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.55  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.55  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.55  # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.55  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.55  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.55  # Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.55  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.55  
% 0.21/0.55  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.55  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.55  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.55  # Parsed axioms                        : 369
% 0.21/0.55  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.55  # Initial clauses                      : 369
% 0.21/0.55  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 7
% 0.21/0.55  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 362
% 0.21/0.55  # Processed clauses                    : 541
% 0.21/0.55  # ...of these trivial                  : 9
% 0.21/0.55  # ...subsumed                          : 24
% 0.21/0.55  # ...remaining for further processing  : 508
% 0.21/0.55  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.55  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.55  # Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 0.21/0.55  # Backward-rewritten                   : 26
% 0.21/0.55  # Generated clauses                    : 107
% 0.21/0.55  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 88
% 0.21/0.55  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.55  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.21/0.55  # Paramodulations                      : 107
% 0.21/0.55  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.55  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.55  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.55  # Total rewrite steps                  : 122
% 0.21/0.55  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.55  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.55  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.55  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.55  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.55  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.55  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.55  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.55  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.55  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.55  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.55  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.55  # Current number of processed clauses  : 150
% 0.21/0.55  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 71
% 0.21/0.55  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.55  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.21/0.55  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 78
% 0.21/0.55  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 234
% 0.21/0.55  # ...number of literals in the above   : 709
% 0.21/0.55  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.55  # Current number of archived clauses   : 358
% 0.21/0.55  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 25191
% 0.21/0.55  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16842
% 0.21/0.55  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 30
% 0.21/0.55  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 188
% 0.21/0.55  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.55  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 30
% 0.21/0.55  # BW rewrite match successes           : 23
% 0.21/0.55  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.55  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.55  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 10435
% 0.21/0.55  
% 0.21/0.55  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.55  # User time                : 0.031 s
% 0.21/0.55  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.55  # Total time               : 0.034 s
% 0.21/0.55  # Maximum resident set size: 2488 pages
% 0.21/0.55  
% 0.21/0.55  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.55  # User time                : 0.137 s
% 0.21/0.55  # System time              : 0.013 s
% 0.21/0.55  # Total time               : 0.150 s
% 0.21/0.55  # Maximum resident set size: 2000 pages
% 0.21/0.55  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.56  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------