TSTP Solution File: SYN144-1 by Metis---2.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Metis---2.4
% Problem : SYN144-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 08:59:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 14
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 33 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 33 RR)
% Number of literals : 61 ( 0 equ; 29 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 11 ( 10 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_13,axiom,
r0(e) ).
cnf(axiom_20,axiom,
l0(a) ).
cnf(axiom_28,axiom,
k0(e) ).
cnf(axiom_37,axiom,
n0(b,a) ).
cnf(rule_001,axiom,
( k1(I)
| ~ n0(J,I) ) ).
cnf(rule_021,axiom,
( m1(I,J,I)
| ~ l0(I)
| ~ k0(J) ) ).
cnf(rule_155,axiom,
( p2(H,I,I)
| ~ k1(J)
| ~ p2(e,H,I) ) ).
cnf(rule_176,axiom,
( p2(D,E,D)
| ~ m1(E,D,E) ) ).
cnf(rule_267,axiom,
( r3(B,C,B)
| ~ p2(B,D,C) ) ).
cnf(rule_285,axiom,
( p4(G,G,H)
| ~ r0(G)
| ~ r3(H,G,H) ) ).
cnf(rule_303,axiom,
( m5(D,E)
| ~ r0(D)
| ~ p4(D,F,E) ) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ m5(e,a) ).
cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
( ~ r0(e)
| ~ r3(a,e,a)
| p4(e,e,a) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_285:[bind(G,$fot(e)),bind(H,$fot(a))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
( ~ p2(a,e,e)
| r3(a,e,a) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_267:[bind(B,$fot(a)),bind(C,$fot(e)),bind(D,$fot(e))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
( ~ n0(b,a)
| k1(a) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_001:[bind(I,$fot(a)),bind(J,$fot(b))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
k1(a),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( n0(b,a) )],[axiom_37,refute_0_2]) ).
cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
( ~ m1(a,e,a)
| p2(e,a,e) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_176:[bind(D,$fot(e)),bind(E,$fot(a))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
( ~ k0(X_169)
| ~ l0(a)
| m1(a,X_169,a) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_021:[bind(I,$fot(a)),bind(J,$fot(X_169))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
( ~ k0(X_169)
| m1(a,X_169,a) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( l0(a) )],[axiom_20,refute_0_5]) ).
cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
( ~ k0(e)
| m1(a,e,a) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_6:[bind(X_169,$fot(e))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
m1(a,e,a),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( k0(e) )],[axiom_28,refute_0_7]) ).
cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
p2(e,a,e),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( m1(a,e,a) )],[refute_0_8,refute_0_4]) ).
cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
( ~ k1(X_267)
| ~ p2(e,a,e)
| p2(a,e,e) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_155:[bind(H,$fot(a)),bind(I,$fot(e)),bind(J,$fot(X_267))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
( ~ k1(X_267)
| p2(a,e,e) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( p2(e,a,e) )],[refute_0_9,refute_0_10]) ).
cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
( ~ k1(a)
| p2(a,e,e) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_11:[bind(X_267,$fot(a))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
p2(a,e,e),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( k1(a) )],[refute_0_3,refute_0_12]) ).
cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
r3(a,e,a),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( p2(a,e,e) )],[refute_0_13,refute_0_1]) ).
cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
( ~ r0(e)
| p4(e,e,a) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( r3(a,e,a) )],[refute_0_14,refute_0_0]) ).
cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
p4(e,e,a),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( r0(e) )],[axiom_13,refute_0_15]) ).
cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
( ~ p4(e,e,a)
| ~ r0(e)
| m5(e,a) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_303:[bind(D,$fot(e)),bind(E,$fot(a)),bind(F,$fot(e))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
( ~ r0(e)
| m5(e,a) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( p4(e,e,a) )],[refute_0_16,refute_0_17]) ).
cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
m5(e,a),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( r0(e) )],[axiom_13,refute_0_18]) ).
cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
$false,
inference(resolve,[$cnf( m5(e,a) )],[refute_0_19,prove_this]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN144-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 15:08:19 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------