TSTP Solution File: SYN141-1 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : SYN141-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 03:05:29 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.71s 1.18s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.71s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 16
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 32 ( 9 unt; 1 nHn; 32 RR)
% Number of literals : 68 ( 0 equ; 39 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 17 ( 16 usr; 3 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 8 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
~ m5(c,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_58,plain,
r0(b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_9) ).
cnf(c_62,plain,
r0(e),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_13) ).
cnf(c_67,plain,
p0(c,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_18) ).
cnf(c_76,plain,
m0(e,b,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_27) ).
cnf(c_79,plain,
n0(e,e),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_30) ).
cnf(c_83,plain,
n0(c,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_34) ).
cnf(c_90,plain,
( ~ m0(X0,X1,X2)
| ~ p0(X2,X1)
| ~ r0(X3)
| l1(X1,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_003) ).
cnf(c_144,plain,
( ~ r0(X0)
| n1(X0,X0,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_057) ).
cnf(c_200,plain,
( ~ m1(X0,X1,X1)
| ~ r0(X2)
| q1(X0,X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_113) ).
cnf(c_257,plain,
( ~ n1(X0,e,e)
| p2(X0,e,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_170) ).
cnf(c_273,plain,
( ~ l1(X0,X1)
| q2(X1,X1,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_186) ).
cnf(c_327,plain,
( ~ p2(X0,X1,X2)
| n3(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_240) ).
cnf(c_342,plain,
( ~ q2(X0,X1,X2)
| ~ n0(X0,X1)
| q3(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_255) ).
cnf(c_361,plain,
( ~ n0(c,d)
| ~ q3(e,b)
| ~ n3(e)
| k4(c) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_274) ).
cnf(c_391,plain,
( ~ k4(X0)
| m5(X0,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_304) ).
cnf(c_673,plain,
( ~ q3(e,b)
| ~ n3(e)
| k4(c) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_361,c_83,c_361]) ).
cnf(c_820,plain,
( ~ r0(X0)
| ~ sP64_iProver_split ),
inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[sP64_iProver_split])],[c_200]) ).
cnf(c_863,plain,
( ~ m0(X0,X1,X2)
| l1(X1,X0)
| ~ p0(X2,X1)
| ~ sP90_iProver_split ),
inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[sP90_iProver_split])],[c_90]) ).
cnf(c_864,plain,
( sP64_iProver_split
| sP90_iProver_split ),
inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[])],[c_90]) ).
cnf(c_874,plain,
( ~ r0(b)
| ~ sP64_iProver_split ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_820]) ).
cnf(c_974,plain,
( ~ r0(e)
| n1(e,e,e) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_144]) ).
cnf(c_975,plain,
( ~ n1(e,e,e)
| p2(e,e,e) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_257]) ).
cnf(c_1245,plain,
( ~ q2(e,e,X0)
| ~ n0(e,e)
| q3(e,X0) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_342]) ).
cnf(c_1246,plain,
( ~ q2(e,e,b)
| ~ n0(e,e)
| q3(e,b) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1245]) ).
cnf(c_1259,plain,
( ~ m0(e,b,c)
| ~ p0(c,b)
| ~ sP90_iProver_split
| l1(b,e) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_863]) ).
cnf(c_1492,plain,
( ~ l1(b,e)
| q2(e,e,b) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_273]) ).
cnf(c_1750,plain,
~ m5(c,c),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).
cnf(c_1956,plain,
( ~ p2(X0,X1,e)
| n3(e) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_327]) ).
cnf(c_2415,plain,
( ~ p2(e,e,e)
| n3(e) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1956]) ).
cnf(c_3198,plain,
( ~ k4(c)
| m5(c,c) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_391]) ).
cnf(c_3199,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_3198,c_2415,c_1750,c_1492,c_1259,c_1246,c_975,c_974,c_874,c_864,c_673,c_76,c_67,c_79,c_58,c_62]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SYN141-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 20:43:01 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.71/1.18 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.71/1.18 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18 ------ iProver source info
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 3.71/1.18 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 3.71/1.18 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.71/1.18 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18 ------ Parsing...successful
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18 ------ preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 44 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18 ------ Preprocessing...------ preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 3.71/1.18 gs_s sp: 104 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.71/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 3.71/1.18 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18 clauses 389
% 3.71/1.18 conjectures 1
% 3.71/1.18 EPR 389
% 3.71/1.18 Horn 338
% 3.71/1.18 unary 51
% 3.71/1.18 binary 157
% 3.71/1.18 lits 973
% 3.71/1.18 lits eq 0
% 3.71/1.18 fd_pure 0
% 3.71/1.18 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.71/1.18 fd_cond 0
% 3.71/1.18 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 3.71/1.18 AC symbols 0
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18 ------ Schedule EPR non Horn non eq is on
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18 ------ no equalities: superposition off
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false" Time Limit: 70.
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18 ------
% 3.71/1.18 Current options:
% 3.71/1.18 ------
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.71/1.18
% 3.71/1.18
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------