TSTP Solution File: SYN125-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SYN125-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4CHlqaRBcY true
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 04:01:50 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.44s 1.01s
% Output : Refutation 1.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13 % Problem : SYN125-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.11/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4CHlqaRBcY true
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 20:20:54 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.15/0.36 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.36 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.15/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.15/0.37 % Running in FO mode
% 0.22/0.66 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.22/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.22/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 1.15/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.15/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.15/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 1.15/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.15/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.15/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.15/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.44/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 1.44/1.01 % Solved by fo/fo7.sh.
% 1.44/1.01 % done 688 iterations in 0.225s
% 1.44/1.01 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.44/1.01 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.44/1.01 thf(k0_type, type, k0: $i > $o).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(l0_type, type, l0: $i > $o).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(e_type, type, e: $i).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(r0_type, type, r0: $i > $o).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(l3_type, type, l3: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(m1_type, type, m1: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(p2_type, type, p2: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(rule_021, axiom,
% 1.44/1.01 (( m1 @ I @ J @ I ) | ( ~( l0 @ I ) ) | ( ~( k0 @ J ) ))).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(zip_derived_cl58, plain,
% 1.44/1.01 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (m1 @ X0 @ X1 @ X0) | ~ (l0 @ X0) | ~ (k0 @ X1))),
% 1.44/1.01 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_021])).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(rule_176, axiom, (( p2 @ D @ E @ D ) | ( ~( m1 @ E @ D @ E ) ))).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(zip_derived_cl211, plain,
% 1.44/1.01 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (p2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X0) | ~ (m1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X1))),
% 1.44/1.01 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_176])).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(rule_215, axiom,
% 1.44/1.01 (( l3 @ G @ H ) | ( ~( r0 @ G ) ) | ( ~( p2 @ G @ H @ G ) ))).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(zip_derived_cl250, plain,
% 1.44/1.01 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.44/1.01 ( (l3 @ X0 @ X1) | ~ (r0 @ X0) | ~ (p2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.44/1.01 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_215])).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(prove_this, conjecture, (l3 @ e @ c)).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( l3 @ e @ c )),
% 1.44/1.01 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(zip_derived_cl333, plain, (~ (l3 @ e @ c)),
% 1.44/1.01 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(zip_derived_cl1345, plain, ((~ (p2 @ e @ c @ e) | ~ (r0 @ e))),
% 1.44/1.01 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl250, zip_derived_cl333])).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(axiom_13, axiom, (r0 @ e)).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain, ( (r0 @ e)),
% 1.44/1.01 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_13])).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(zip_derived_cl1347, plain, (~ (p2 @ e @ c @ e)),
% 1.44/1.01 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1345, zip_derived_cl12])).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(zip_derived_cl1349, plain, (~ (m1 @ c @ e @ c)),
% 1.44/1.01 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl211, zip_derived_cl1347])).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(zip_derived_cl1352, plain, ((~ (k0 @ e) | ~ (l0 @ c))),
% 1.44/1.01 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl58, zip_derived_cl1349])).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(axiom_28, axiom, (k0 @ e)).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain, ( (k0 @ e)),
% 1.44/1.01 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_28])).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(axiom_24, axiom, (l0 @ c)).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(zip_derived_cl23, plain, ( (l0 @ c)),
% 1.44/1.01 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_24])).
% 1.44/1.01 thf(zip_derived_cl1355, plain, ($false),
% 1.44/1.01 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 1.44/1.01 [zip_derived_cl1352, zip_derived_cl27, zip_derived_cl23])).
% 1.44/1.01
% 1.44/1.01 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.44/1.01
% 1.44/1.01
% 1.44/1.01 % Terminating...
% 1.67/1.06 % Runner terminated.
% 1.67/1.07 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------