TSTP Solution File: SYN122-1 by Metis---2.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Metis---2.4
% Problem : SYN122-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 08:59:50 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.40s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 14
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 35 ( 17 unt; 0 nHn; 23 RR)
% Number of literals : 64 ( 0 equ; 30 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 21 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
p0(b,X) ).
cnf(axiom_17,axiom,
q0(X,d) ).
cnf(axiom_23,axiom,
m0(a,e,e) ).
cnf(axiom_30,axiom,
n0(e,e) ).
cnf(axiom_36,axiom,
q0(a,b) ).
cnf(rule_125,axiom,
( s1(I)
| ~ p0(I,I) ) ).
cnf(rule_126,axiom,
( s1(F)
| ~ q0(F,G)
| ~ s1(H) ) ).
cnf(rule_131,axiom,
( l2(D,E)
| ~ s1(D)
| ~ n0(e,E)
| ~ l2(E,E) ) ).
cnf(rule_133,axiom,
( l2(J,J)
| ~ p0(A,A)
| ~ s1(B)
| ~ m0(C,B,J) ) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ l2(b,e) ).
cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
p0(b,b),
inference(subst,[],[axiom_14:[bind(X,$fot(b))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
( ~ p0(b,b)
| s1(b) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_125:[bind(I,$fot(b))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
s1(b),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( p0(b,b) )],[refute_0_0,refute_0_1]) ).
cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
( ~ q0(a,b)
| ~ s1(X_217)
| s1(a) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_126:[bind(F,$fot(a)),bind(G,$fot(b)),bind(H,$fot(X_217))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
( ~ s1(X_217)
| s1(a) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( q0(a,b) )],[axiom_36,refute_0_3]) ).
cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
( ~ s1(b)
| s1(a) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_4:[bind(X_217,$fot(b))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
s1(a),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( s1(b) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_5]) ).
cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
q0(X_215,d),
inference(subst,[],[axiom_17:[bind(X,$fot(X_215))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
( ~ q0(X_215,d)
| ~ s1(X_217)
| s1(X_215) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_126:[bind(F,$fot(X_215)),bind(G,$fot(d)),bind(H,$fot(X_217))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
( ~ s1(X_217)
| s1(X_215) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( q0(X_215,d) )],[refute_0_7,refute_0_8]) ).
cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
( ~ s1(a)
| s1(X_221) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_9:[bind(X_215,$fot(X_221)),bind(X_217,$fot(a))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
s1(X_221),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( s1(a) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_10]) ).
cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
s1(D),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_11:[bind(X_221,$fot(D))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
( ~ l2(E,E)
| ~ n0(e,E)
| l2(D,E) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( s1(D) )],[refute_0_12,rule_131]) ).
cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
( ~ l2(e,e)
| ~ n0(e,e)
| l2(X_358,e) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_13:[bind(D,$fot(X_358)),bind(E,$fot(e))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
( ~ l2(e,e)
| l2(X_358,e) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( n0(e,e) )],[axiom_30,refute_0_14]) ).
cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
s1(B),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_11:[bind(X_221,$fot(B))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
( ~ m0(C,B,J)
| ~ p0(A,A)
| l2(J,J) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( s1(B) )],[refute_0_16,rule_133]) ).
cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
( ~ m0(a,e,e)
| ~ p0(X_748,X_748)
| l2(e,e) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_17:[bind(A,$fot(X_748)),bind(B,$fot(e)),bind(C,$fot(a)),bind(J,$fot(e))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
( ~ p0(X_748,X_748)
| l2(e,e) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( m0(a,e,e) )],[axiom_23,refute_0_18]) ).
cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
( ~ p0(b,b)
| l2(e,e) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_19:[bind(X_748,$fot(b))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_21,plain,
l2(e,e),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( p0(b,b) )],[refute_0_0,refute_0_20]) ).
cnf(refute_0_22,plain,
l2(X_358,e),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( l2(e,e) )],[refute_0_21,refute_0_15]) ).
cnf(refute_0_23,plain,
l2(b,e),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_22:[bind(X_358,$fot(b))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_24,plain,
$false,
inference(resolve,[$cnf( l2(b,e) )],[refute_0_23,prove_this]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SYN122-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 18:05:12 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.40/0.57 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/0.57
% 0.40/0.57 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.40/0.57
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------