TSTP Solution File: SYN121-1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SYN121-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:18:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 21 RR)
% Number of literals : 37 ( 0 equ; 20 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 8 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
~ l2(a,b),
file('SYN121-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(12,axiom,
n0(e,b),
file('SYN121-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(15,axiom,
p0(b,u),
file('SYN121-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(18,axiom,
q0(u,d),
file('SYN121-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(20,axiom,
m0(u,d,v),
file('SYN121-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(37,axiom,
q0(a,b),
file('SYN121-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(164,axiom,
( ~ p0(u,u)
| s1(u) ),
file('SYN121-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(165,axiom,
( ~ s1(u)
| ~ q0(v,w)
| s1(v) ),
file('SYN121-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(170,axiom,
( ~ s1(u)
| ~ l2(v,v)
| ~ n0(e,v)
| l2(u,v) ),
file('SYN121-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(172,axiom,
( ~ s1(u)
| ~ p0(v,v)
| ~ m0(w,u,x)
| l2(x,x) ),
file('SYN121-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(419,plain,
( ~ s1(a)
| ~ n0(e,b)
| ~ l2(b,b) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[170,1]),
[iquote('0:Res:170.3,1.0')] ).
cnf(420,plain,
( ~ s1(a)
| ~ l2(b,b) ),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[419,12]),
[iquote('0:MRR:419.1,12.0')] ).
cnf(455,plain,
s1(b),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[15,164]),
[iquote('0:Res:15.0,164.0')] ).
cnf(603,plain,
( ~ q0(u,v)
| s1(u) ),
inference(ems,[status(thm)],[165,455]),
[iquote('0:EmS:165.0,455.0')] ).
cnf(604,plain,
s1(a),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[37,603]),
[iquote('0:Res:37.0,603.0')] ).
cnf(609,plain,
s1(u),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[18,603]),
[iquote('0:Res:18.0,603.0')] ).
cnf(611,plain,
~ l2(b,b),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[420,604]),
[iquote('0:MRR:420.0,604.0')] ).
cnf(617,plain,
( ~ p0(u,u)
| ~ m0(v,w,x)
| l2(x,x) ),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[172,609]),
[iquote('0:MRR:172.0,609.0')] ).
cnf(993,plain,
( ~ p0(u,u)
| l2(v,v) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[20,617]),
[iquote('0:Res:20.0,617.1')] ).
cnf(994,plain,
l2(u,u),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[15,993]),
[iquote('0:Res:15.0,993.0')] ).
cnf(995,plain,
$false,
inference(unc,[status(thm)],[994,611]),
[iquote('0:UnC:994.0,611.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN121-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 06:00:59 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.20/0.51 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.51 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.51 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.51 SPASS derived 502 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 599 clauses.
% 0.20/0.51 SPASS allocated 76365 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.51 SPASS spent 0:00:00.15 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.51 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.20/0.51 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.51 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.51 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.51 0:00:00.05 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 Here is a proof with depth 3, length 21 :
% 0.20/0.51 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.51 Formulae used in the proof : prove_this axiom_11 axiom_14 axiom_17 axiom_19 axiom_36 rule_125 rule_126 rule_131 rule_133
% 0.20/0.51
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------