TSTP Solution File: SYN120-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN120-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:13:51 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_002,axiom,
( l1(X1,X1)
| ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FjLNcuBRtW/E---3.1_22289.p',rule_002) ).
cnf(axiom_30,axiom,
n0(e,e),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FjLNcuBRtW/E---3.1_22289.p',axiom_30) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ l1(e,e),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FjLNcuBRtW/E---3.1_22289.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
( l1(X1,X1)
| ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
rule_002 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
n0(e,e),
axiom_30 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ l1(e,e),
prove_this ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.15 % Problem : SYN120-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.10/0.16 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.37 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.16/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:01:59 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FjLNcuBRtW/E---3.1_22289.p
% 0.23/0.57 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.23/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.57 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.57 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.57 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.57 # new_bool_3 with pid 22371 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.23/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.57 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.57 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.57 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.57 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.57 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.57 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 22377 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.23/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.57 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.57 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.57 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.57 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.57 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.57 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.57 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.23/0.57
% 0.23/0.57 # Proof found!
% 0.23/0.57 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/0.57 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.57 # Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.23/0.57 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 84
% 0.23/0.57 # Initial clauses : 285
% 0.23/0.57 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.23/0.57 # Initial clauses in saturation : 280
% 0.23/0.57 # Processed clauses : 329
% 0.23/0.57 # ...of these trivial : 6
% 0.23/0.57 # ...subsumed : 24
% 0.23/0.57 # ...remaining for further processing : 299
% 0.23/0.57 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.23/0.57 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.23/0.57 # Generated clauses : 18
% 0.23/0.57 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12
% 0.23/0.57 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.23/0.57 # Paramodulations : 18
% 0.23/0.57 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Total rewrite steps : 68
% 0.23/0.57 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.57 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.57 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.57 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.57 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.57 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.57 # Current number of processed clauses : 48
% 0.23/0.57 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 36
% 0.23/0.57 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/0.57 # Non-unit-clauses : 11
% 0.23/0.57 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 204
% 0.23/0.57 # ...number of literals in the above : 576
% 0.23/0.57 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Current number of archived clauses : 251
% 0.23/0.57 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12814
% 0.23/0.57 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8635
% 0.23/0.57 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 25
% 0.23/0.57 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% 0.23/0.57 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.23/0.57 # BW rewrite match successes : 5
% 0.23/0.57 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7884
% 0.23/0.57
% 0.23/0.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.57 # User time : 0.024 s
% 0.23/0.57 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.23/0.57 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 0.23/0.57 # Maximum resident set size: 2412 pages
% 0.23/0.57
% 0.23/0.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.57 # User time : 0.029 s
% 0.23/0.57 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.23/0.57 # Total time : 0.040 s
% 0.23/0.57 # Maximum resident set size: 2000 pages
% 0.23/0.57 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.23/0.58 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------