TSTP Solution File: SYN117-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN117-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 08:35:34 EST 2010
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.42s
% Output : Refutation 0.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP12567/SYN/SYN117-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 831] [nf = 0] [nu = 404] [ut = 133]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6515] [nf = 78] [nu = 2294] [ut = 241]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% +================================================+
% | |
% | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. |
% | |
% +================================================+
% Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof:
% ============================================
% Base Clauses:
% -------------
% B0: ~k5_1(e_0())
% B2: p0_2(b_0(),x0)
% B13: n0_2(d_0(),e_0())
% B39: ~p1_3(x1,x2,x0) | n2_1(x0)
% B48: ~n0_2(x1,x0) | l1_2(x0,x0)
% B52: ~l1_2(x1,x0) | p2_3(x0,x0,x0)
% B57: ~p0_2(x1,x0) | p1_3(x0,x0,x0)
% B87: ~n2_1(x0) | p3_3(x0,x0,x0)
% B132: ~l1_2(x0,x2) | ~p3_3(x1,x2,x3) | s4_1(x0)
% B142: ~s4_1(x1) | ~r3_3(x2,x0,x0) | k5_1(x0)
% Unit Clauses:
% --------------
% U13: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c2 t2 td1 b > n0_2(d_0(),e_0())
% U44: < d1 v3 dv1 f0 c0 t3 td1 > p1_3(x0,x0,x0)
% U66: < d1 v0 dv0 f0 c2 t2 td1 > l1_2(e_0(),e_0())
% U88: < d1 v1 dv1 f0 c0 t1 td1 > n2_1(x0)
% U94: < d1 v0 dv0 f0 c3 t3 td1 > p2_3(e_0(),e_0(),e_0())
% U125: < d1 v3 dv1 f0 c0 t3 td1 > p3_3(x0,x0,x0)
% U241: < d3 v1 dv1 f0 c0 t1 td1 > ~s4_1(x0)
% U380: < d3 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 > s4_1(e_0())
% --------------- Start of Proof ---------------
% Derivation of unit clause U13:
% n0_2(d_0(),e_0()) ....... U13
% Derivation of unit clause U44:
% p0_2(b_0(),x0) ....... B2
% ~p0_2(x1,x0) | p1_3(x0,x0,x0) ....... B57
% p1_3(x0, x0, x0) ....... R1 [B2:L0, B57:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U66:
% n0_2(d_0(),e_0()) ....... B13
% ~n0_2(x1,x0) | l1_2(x0,x0) ....... B48
% l1_2(e_0(), e_0()) ....... R1 [B13:L0, B48:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U88:
% ~p1_3(x1,x2,x0) | n2_1(x0) ....... B39
% p1_3(x0,x0,x0) ....... U44
% n2_1(x0) ....... R1 [B39:L0, U44:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U94:
% ~l1_2(x1,x0) | p2_3(x0,x0,x0) ....... B52
% l1_2(e_0(),e_0()) ....... U66
% p2_3(e_0(), e_0(), e_0()) ....... R1 [B52:L0, U66:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U125:
% ~n2_1(x0) | p3_3(x0,x0,x0) ....... B87
% n2_1(x0) ....... U88
% p3_3(x0, x0, x0) ....... R1 [B87:L0, U88:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U241:
% ~k5_1(e_0()) ....... B0
% ~s4_1(x1) | ~r3_3(x2,x0,x0) | k5_1(x0) ....... B142
% ~s4_1(x0) | ~r3_3(x1, e_0(), e_0()) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B142:L2]
% ~p2_3(x0,x2,x1) | r3_3(x0,x1,x0) ....... B46
% ~s4_1(x0) | ~p2_3(e_0(), x1, e_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L1, B46:L1]
% p2_3(e_0(),e_0(),e_0()) ....... U94
% ~s4_1(x0) ....... R3 [R2:L1, U94:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U380:
% ~n0_2(x1,x0) | l1_2(x0,x0) ....... B48
% ~l1_2(x0,x2) | ~p3_3(x1,x2,x3) | s4_1(x0) ....... B132
% ~n0_2(x0, x1) | ~p3_3(x2, x1, x3) | s4_1(x1) ....... R1 [B48:L1, B132:L0]
% n0_2(d_0(),e_0()) ....... U13
% ~p3_3(x0, e_0(), x1) | s4_1(e_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U13:L0]
% p3_3(x0,x0,x0) ....... U125
% s4_1(e_0()) ....... R3 [R2:L0, U125:L0]
% Derivation of the empty clause:
% s4_1(e_0()) ....... U380
% ~s4_1(x0) ....... U241
% [] ....... R1 [U380:L0, U241:L0]
% --------------- End of Proof ---------------
% PROOF FOUND!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 44160
% resolvents: 43803 factors: 357
% Number of unit clauses generated: 17417
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 39.44
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 39 [1] = 94 [2] = 108 [3] = 140
% Total = 381
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 17417 [2] = 21429 [3] = 5314
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] k0_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [1] k1_1 (+)5 (-)0
% [2] k4_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [3] k5_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [4] l0_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [5] l4_1 (+)6 (-)0
% [6] l5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] m2_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [8] n2_1 (+)6 (-)0
% [9] n3_1 (+)6 (-)0
% [10] r0_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [11] r1_1 (+)5 (-)0
% [12] r2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] r4_1 (+)6 (-)0
% [14] s0_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [15] s1_1 (+)5 (-)0
% [16] s2_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [17] s4_1 (+)1 (-)1
% [18] s5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] k2_2 (+)6 (-)0
% [20] l1_2 (+)7 (-)0
% [21] l2_2 (+)14 (-)0
% [22] l3_2 (+)12 (-)0
% [23] m4_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] m5_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] n0_2 (+)8 (-)0
% [26] n4_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] n5_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [28] p0_2 (+)4 (-)0
% [29] q0_2 (+)8 (-)0
% [30] q3_2 (+)4 (-)0
% [31] q4_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] q5_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] r5_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] s3_2 (+)2 (-)0
% [35] k3_3 (+)24 (-)0
% [36] m0_3 (+)10 (-)0
% [37] m1_3 (+)35 (-)0
% [38] m3_3 (+)7 (-)0
% [39] n1_3 (+)32 (-)0
% [40] p1_3 (+)29 (-)0
% [41] p2_3 (+)32 (-)0
% [42] p3_3 (+)6 (-)0
% [43] p4_3 (+)10 (-)0
% [44] p5_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [45] q1_3 (+)42 (-)0
% [46] q2_3 (+)20 (-)0
% [47] r3_3 (+)14 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)379 (-)2
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 381
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 642435
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 6858
% Number of successful unifications: 44171
% Number of unification failures: 47916
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 193869
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 696420
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 87
% Max entries in substitution set: 9
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 15142
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 355
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 969
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.37
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 87
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 92087
% ConstructUnitClause() = 15484
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.02 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: inf
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 1 secs
% CPU time: 0.41 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------