TSTP Solution File: SYN114-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SYN114-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:13:49 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   19 (   0 equ;   8 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_001,axiom,
    ( k1(X1)
    | ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Av5d3Thk8N/E---3.1_10070.p',rule_001) ).

cnf(axiom_11,axiom,
    n0(e,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Av5d3Thk8N/E---3.1_10070.p',axiom_11) ).

cnf(rule_159,axiom,
    ( p2(X1,X1,X1)
    | ~ k1(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Av5d3Thk8N/E---3.1_10070.p',rule_159) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ k3(X1,X1,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Av5d3Thk8N/E---3.1_10070.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(rule_206,axiom,
    ( k3(X1,X2,X1)
    | ~ p2(X2,X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Av5d3Thk8N/E---3.1_10070.p',rule_206) ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    ( k1(X1)
    | ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
    rule_001 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    n0(e,b),
    axiom_11 ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    ( p2(X1,X1,X1)
    | ~ k1(X1) ),
    rule_159 ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    k1(b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ k3(X1,X1,b),
    prove_this ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    ( k3(X1,X2,X1)
    | ~ p2(X2,X1,X1) ),
    rule_206 ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    p2(b,b,b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : SYN114-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 18:05:24 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.46  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Av5d3Thk8N/E---3.1_10070.p
% 0.18/0.49  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.18/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # new_bool_1 with pid 10151 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.18/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.49  # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.49  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 10154 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.18/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.49  # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.49  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.49  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49  # Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.49  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.49  
% 0.18/0.49  # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.49  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.49  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.49  # Parsed axioms                        : 369
% 0.18/0.49  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 155
% 0.18/0.49  # Initial clauses                      : 214
% 0.18/0.49  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 5
% 0.18/0.49  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 209
% 0.18/0.49  # Processed clauses                    : 272
% 0.18/0.49  # ...of these trivial                  : 13
% 0.18/0.49  # ...subsumed                          : 15
% 0.18/0.49  # ...remaining for further processing  : 244
% 0.18/0.49  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.18/0.49  # Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.18/0.49  # Generated clauses                    : 32
% 0.18/0.49  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 27
% 0.18/0.49  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.18/0.49  # Paramodulations                      : 32
% 0.18/0.49  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Total rewrite steps                  : 64
% 0.18/0.49  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.18/0.49  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.18/0.49  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.49  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.18/0.49  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.49  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.18/0.49  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49  # Current number of processed clauses  : 56
% 0.18/0.49  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 43
% 0.18/0.49  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.49  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.18/0.49  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 12
% 0.18/0.49  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 147
% 0.18/0.49  # ...number of literals in the above   : 407
% 0.18/0.49  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Current number of archived clauses   : 188
% 0.18/0.49  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7009
% 0.18/0.49  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4929
% 0.18/0.49  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 17
% 0.18/0.49  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% 0.18/0.49  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.18/0.49  # BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.18/0.49  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.18/0.49  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 6851
% 0.18/0.49  
% 0.18/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 0.18/0.49  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.18/0.49  # Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.18/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 2316 pages
% 0.18/0.49  
% 0.18/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49  # User time                : 0.019 s
% 0.18/0.49  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.18/0.49  # Total time               : 0.026 s
% 0.18/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 2000 pages
% 0.18/0.49  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.18/0.49  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------