TSTP Solution File: SYN111-1 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : SYN111-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 03:33:12 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 29.99s 4.26s
% Output : Proof 30.43s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.13 % Problem : SYN111-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.09/0.14 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.10/0.34 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 18:38:25 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 29.99/4.26 Command-line arguments: --kbo-weight0 --lhs-weight 5 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --goal-heuristic
% 29.99/4.26
% 29.99/4.26 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 29.99/4.26
% 30.43/4.26 % SZS output start Proof
% 30.43/4.26 Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 30.43/4.27 fof(axiom_11, axiom, n0(e, b)).
% 30.43/4.27 fof(axiom_19, axiom, ![X, Y]: m0(X, d, Y)).
% 30.43/4.27 fof(axiom_24, axiom, l0(c)).
% 30.43/4.27 fof(axiom_32, axiom, k0(b)).
% 30.43/4.27 fof(prove_this, negated_conjecture, ~k2(c, b)).
% 30.43/4.27 fof(rule_001, axiom, ![I, J]: (k1(I) | ~n0(J, I))).
% 30.43/4.27 fof(rule_021, axiom, ![J2, I2]: (m1(I2, J2, I2) | (~l0(I2) | ~k0(J2)))).
% 30.43/4.27 fof(rule_107, axiom, ![A2]: (q1(e, A2, A2) | (~m0(A2, d, A2) | ~m0(e, d, A2)))).
% 30.43/4.27 fof(rule_127, axiom, ![C, D, E, F]: (k2(C, D) | (~m1(E, D, C) | (~k1(F) | ~k2(F, D))))).
% 30.43/4.27 fof(rule_129, axiom, ![A, J2]: (k2(J2, J2) | ~q1(A, J2, J2))).
% 30.43/4.27
% 30.43/4.27 Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 30.43/4.27 http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 30.43/4.27 We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 30.43/4.27 fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 30.43/4.27 C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 30.43/4.27 where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 30.43/4.27 variables of u and v.
% 30.43/4.27 A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 30.43/4.27 input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 30.43/4.27
% 30.43/4.27 The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 30.43/4.27
% 30.43/4.27 Axiom 1 (axiom_24): l0(c) = true.
% 30.43/4.27 Axiom 2 (axiom_11): n0(e, b) = true.
% 30.43/4.27 Axiom 3 (axiom_32): k0(b) = true.
% 30.43/4.27 Axiom 4 (axiom_19): m0(X, d, Y) = true.
% 30.43/4.27 Axiom 5 (rule_001): fresh440(X, X, Y) = true.
% 30.43/4.27 Axiom 6 (rule_107): fresh301(X, X, Y) = q1(e, Y, Y).
% 30.43/4.27 Axiom 7 (rule_107): fresh300(X, X, Y) = true.
% 30.43/4.27 Axiom 8 (rule_129): fresh270(X, X, Y) = true.
% 30.43/4.27 Axiom 9 (rule_127): fresh591(X, X, Y, Z) = true.
% 30.43/4.27 Axiom 10 (rule_001): fresh440(n0(X, Y), true, Y) = k1(Y).
% 30.43/4.27 Axiom 11 (rule_021): fresh415(X, X, Y, Z) = m1(Y, Z, Y).
% 30.43/4.27 Axiom 12 (rule_021): fresh414(X, X, Y, Z) = true.
% 30.43/4.27 Axiom 13 (rule_021): fresh415(k0(X), true, Y, X) = fresh414(l0(Y), true, Y, X).
% 30.43/4.27 Axiom 14 (rule_107): fresh301(m0(e, d, X), true, X) = fresh300(m0(X, d, X), true, X).
% 30.43/4.27 Axiom 15 (rule_127): fresh272(X, X, Y, Z, W) = k2(Y, Z).
% 30.43/4.27 Axiom 16 (rule_129): fresh270(q1(X, Y, Y), true, Y) = k2(Y, Y).
% 30.43/4.27 Axiom 17 (rule_127): fresh590(X, X, Y, Z, W, V) = fresh591(k1(W), true, Y, Z).
% 30.43/4.27 Axiom 18 (rule_127): fresh590(k2(X, Y), true, Z, Y, X, W) = fresh272(m1(W, Y, Z), true, Z, Y, X).
% 30.43/4.27
% 30.43/4.27 Goal 1 (prove_this): k2(c, b) = true.
% 30.43/4.27 Proof:
% 30.43/4.27 k2(c, b)
% 30.43/4.27 = { by axiom 15 (rule_127) R->L }
% 30.43/4.27 fresh272(true, true, c, b, b)
% 30.43/4.27 = { by axiom 12 (rule_021) R->L }
% 30.43/4.27 fresh272(fresh414(true, true, c, b), true, c, b, b)
% 30.43/4.27 = { by axiom 1 (axiom_24) R->L }
% 30.43/4.27 fresh272(fresh414(l0(c), true, c, b), true, c, b, b)
% 30.43/4.27 = { by axiom 13 (rule_021) R->L }
% 30.43/4.27 fresh272(fresh415(k0(b), true, c, b), true, c, b, b)
% 30.43/4.27 = { by axiom 3 (axiom_32) }
% 30.43/4.27 fresh272(fresh415(true, true, c, b), true, c, b, b)
% 30.43/4.27 = { by axiom 11 (rule_021) }
% 30.43/4.27 fresh272(m1(c, b, c), true, c, b, b)
% 30.43/4.27 = { by axiom 18 (rule_127) R->L }
% 30.43/4.27 fresh590(k2(b, b), true, c, b, b, c)
% 30.43/4.27 = { by axiom 16 (rule_129) R->L }
% 30.43/4.27 fresh590(fresh270(q1(e, b, b), true, b), true, c, b, b, c)
% 30.43/4.27 = { by axiom 6 (rule_107) R->L }
% 30.43/4.27 fresh590(fresh270(fresh301(true, true, b), true, b), true, c, b, b, c)
% 30.43/4.27 = { by axiom 4 (axiom_19) R->L }
% 30.43/4.27 fresh590(fresh270(fresh301(m0(e, d, b), true, b), true, b), true, c, b, b, c)
% 30.43/4.27 = { by axiom 14 (rule_107) }
% 30.43/4.27 fresh590(fresh270(fresh300(m0(b, d, b), true, b), true, b), true, c, b, b, c)
% 30.43/4.27 = { by axiom 4 (axiom_19) }
% 30.43/4.27 fresh590(fresh270(fresh300(true, true, b), true, b), true, c, b, b, c)
% 30.43/4.27 = { by axiom 7 (rule_107) }
% 30.43/4.27 fresh590(fresh270(true, true, b), true, c, b, b, c)
% 30.43/4.27 = { by axiom 8 (rule_129) }
% 30.43/4.27 fresh590(true, true, c, b, b, c)
% 30.43/4.27 = { by axiom 17 (rule_127) }
% 30.43/4.27 fresh591(k1(b), true, c, b)
% 30.43/4.27 = { by axiom 10 (rule_001) R->L }
% 30.43/4.27 fresh591(fresh440(n0(e, b), true, b), true, c, b)
% 30.43/4.27 = { by axiom 2 (axiom_11) }
% 30.43/4.27 fresh591(fresh440(true, true, b), true, c, b)
% 30.43/4.27 = { by axiom 5 (rule_001) }
% 30.43/4.27 fresh591(true, true, c, b)
% 30.43/4.27 = { by axiom 9 (rule_127) }
% 30.43/4.27 true
% 30.43/4.27 % SZS output end Proof
% 30.43/4.27
% 30.43/4.27 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------