TSTP Solution File: SYN109-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SYN109-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PlVu2EYLO6 true

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 04:01:45 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.46s 0.91s
% Output   : Refutation 1.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SYN109-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PlVu2EYLO6 true
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 19:51:53 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.36  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36  % Running in FO mode
% 0.22/0.66  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.22/0.66  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.22/0.66  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.22/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.19/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.19/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.19/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.19/0.83  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 1.46/0.91  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 1.46/0.91  % BCE start: 369
% 1.46/0.91  % BCE eliminated: 40
% 1.46/0.91  % PE start: 329
% 1.46/0.91  logic: neq
% 1.46/0.91  % PE eliminated: -6
% 1.46/0.91  % done 409 iterations in 0.169s
% 1.46/0.91  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.46/0.91  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.46/0.91  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(s0_type, type, s0: $i > $o).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(m0_type, type, m0: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(k1_type, type, k1: $i > $o).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(p0_type, type, p0: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(q1_type, type, q1: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(m1_type, type, m1: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(k2_type, type, k2: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(n0_type, type, n0: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(axiom_19, axiom, (m0 @ X @ d @ Y)).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain, (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:  (m0 @ X0 @ d @ X1)),
% 1.46/0.91      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_19])).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(rule_110, axiom, (( q1 @ B @ B @ B ) | ( ~( m0 @ C @ D @ B ) ))).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl147, plain,
% 1.46/0.91      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.46/0.91         ( (q1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (m0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X0))),
% 1.46/0.91      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_110])).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl1053, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (q1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 1.46/0.91      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl147])).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(rule_129, axiom, (( k2 @ J @ J ) | ( ~( q1 @ A @ J @ J ) ))).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl166, plain,
% 1.46/0.91      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (k2 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (q1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X0))),
% 1.46/0.91      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_129])).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl1061, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (k2 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 1.46/0.91      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)],
% 1.46/0.91                [zip_derived_cl1053, zip_derived_cl166])).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(axiom_14, axiom, (p0 @ b @ X)).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (p0 @ b @ X0)),
% 1.46/0.91      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_14])).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(rule_029, axiom,
% 1.46/0.91    (( m1 @ H @ I @ H ) | ( ~( p0 @ H @ I ) ) | ( ~( s0 @ H ) ))).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl66, plain,
% 1.46/0.91      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.46/0.91         ( (m1 @ X0 @ X1 @ X0) | ~ (p0 @ X0 @ X1) | ~ (s0 @ X0))),
% 1.46/0.91      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_029])).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl825, plain,
% 1.46/0.91      (![X0 : $i]: ( (m1 @ b @ X0 @ b) | ~ (s0 @ b))),
% 1.46/0.91      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl66])).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(axiom_5, axiom, (s0 @ b)).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, ( (s0 @ b)),
% 1.46/0.91      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_5])).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl827, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (m1 @ b @ X0 @ b)),
% 1.46/0.91      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl825, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(rule_127, axiom,
% 1.46/0.91    (( k2 @ C @ D ) | ( ~( m1 @ E @ D @ C ) ) | ( ~( k1 @ F ) ) | 
% 1.46/0.91     ( ~( k2 @ F @ D ) ))).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl164, plain,
% 1.46/0.91      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.46/0.91         ( (k2 @ X0 @ X1)
% 1.46/0.91          | ~ (m1 @ X2 @ X1 @ X0)
% 1.46/0.91          | ~ (k1 @ X3)
% 1.46/0.91          | ~ (k2 @ X3 @ X1))),
% 1.46/0.91      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_127])).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl1223, plain,
% 1.46/0.91      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (k2 @ b @ X0) | ~ (k1 @ X1) | ~ (k2 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.46/0.91      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl827, zip_derived_cl164])).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl1234, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ( (k2 @ b @ X0) | ~ (k1 @ X0))),
% 1.46/0.91      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)],
% 1.46/0.91                [zip_derived_cl1061, zip_derived_cl1223])).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(prove_this, conjecture, (k2 @ b @ c)).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( k2 @ b @ c )),
% 1.46/0.91    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl368, plain, (~ (k2 @ b @ c)),
% 1.46/0.91      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl1243, plain, (~ (k1 @ c)),
% 1.46/0.91      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)],
% 1.46/0.91                [zip_derived_cl1234, zip_derived_cl368])).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(axiom_26, axiom, (n0 @ d @ c)).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain, ( (n0 @ d @ c)),
% 1.46/0.91      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_26])).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(rule_001, axiom, (( k1 @ I ) | ( ~( n0 @ J @ I ) ))).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl38, plain,
% 1.46/0.91      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (k1 @ X0) | ~ (n0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.46/0.91      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_001])).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl711, plain, ( (k1 @ c)),
% 1.46/0.91      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl25, zip_derived_cl38])).
% 1.46/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl1245, plain, ($false),
% 1.46/0.91      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1243, zip_derived_cl711])).
% 1.46/0.91  
% 1.46/0.91  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.46/0.91  
% 1.46/0.91  
% 1.46/0.91  % Terminating...
% 1.90/0.95  % Runner terminated.
% 1.92/0.96  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------