TSTP Solution File: SYN101-1.002.002 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : SYN101-1.002.002 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 19:25:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.44s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 23 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 27 ( 15 ~; 12 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f25,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f24,f14]) ).
fof(f14,axiom,
nq_1(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_1) ).
fof(f24,plain,
~ nq_1(a),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f23,f16]) ).
fof(f16,axiom,
nq_2(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_3) ).
fof(f23,plain,
( ~ nq_2(a)
| ~ nq_1(a) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f20,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
~ p_1_2(a,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_s2_goal_1) ).
fof(f20,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( p_1_2(X0,X1)
| ~ nq_2(X1)
| ~ nq_1(X0) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f18,f12]) ).
fof(f12,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( p_2_2(X0,X1)
| ~ nq_2(X1)
| ~ nq_1(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_t2_3) ).
fof(f18,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ nq_2(X1)
| ~ p_2_2(X0,X1)
| ~ nq_1(X0)
| p_1_2(X0,X1) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f2,f10]) ).
fof(f10,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( p_1_1(X0,X1)
| ~ nq_2(X1)
| ~ nq_1(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_t2_1) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ p_1_1(X0,X1)
| p_1_2(X0,X1)
| ~ p_2_2(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_s2_type11_1) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SYN101-1.002.002 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 21:28:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 % (19366)lrs+10_1:1_kws=precedence:lwlo=on:tgt=ground:i=99966:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99966Mi)
% 0.18/0.44 % (19372)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=49:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/49Mi)
% 0.18/0.44 % (19372)First to succeed.
% 0.18/0.44 % (19372)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.18/0.44 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.44 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.44 % (19372)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.44 % (19372)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.18/0.44 % (19372)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.18/0.44 % (19372)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 % (19372)Memory used [KB]: 1279
% 0.18/0.44 % (19372)Time elapsed: 0.069 s
% 0.18/0.44 % (19372)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.18/0.44 % (19372)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.44 % (19372)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.44 % (19365)Success in time 0.111 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------