TSTP Solution File: SYN101-1.002.002 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : SYN101-1.002.002 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:50:06 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 16
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 7 unt; 10 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 28 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 30 ( 16 ~; 14 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 14 ( 8 >; 6 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
a: $i ).
tff(decl_23,type,
p_1_2: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
p_2_2: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_25,type,
p_1_1: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_26,type,
q_2_2: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_27,type,
q_1_1: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_28,type,
q_1_2: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_29,type,
nq_1: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_30,type,
nq_2: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_31,type,
b: $i ).
cnf(n_s2_type11_1,axiom,
( p_1_2(X1,X2)
| ~ p_2_2(X1,X2)
| ~ p_1_1(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_s2_type11_1) ).
cnf(n_t2_1,axiom,
( p_1_1(X1,X2)
| ~ nq_1(X1)
| ~ nq_2(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_t2_1) ).
cnf(n_t2_3,axiom,
( p_2_2(X1,X2)
| ~ nq_1(X1)
| ~ nq_2(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_t2_3) ).
cnf(n_s2_goal_1,negated_conjecture,
~ p_1_2(a,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_s2_goal_1) ).
cnf(n_3,axiom,
nq_2(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_3) ).
cnf(n_1,axiom,
nq_1(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_1) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
( p_1_2(X1,X2)
| ~ p_2_2(X1,X2)
| ~ p_1_1(X1,X2) ),
n_s2_type11_1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( p_1_1(X1,X2)
| ~ nq_1(X1)
| ~ nq_2(X2) ),
n_t2_1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( p_2_2(X1,X2)
| ~ nq_1(X1)
| ~ nq_2(X2) ),
n_t2_3 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ p_1_2(a,a),
n_s2_goal_1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( p_1_2(X1,X2)
| ~ nq_2(X2)
| ~ nq_1(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
nq_2(a),
n_3 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
nq_1(a),
n_1 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14 % Problem : SYN101-1.002.002 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.15 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 21:32:50 EDT 2023
% 0.22/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.60 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.62 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.22/0.62 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.62 % Proof found
% 0.22/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.62 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.62 % Total time : 0.004000 s
% 0.22/0.62 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.22/0.62 % Total time : 0.007000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------