TSTP Solution File: SYN101-1.002.002 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SYN101-1.002.002 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:44:12 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN101-1.002.002 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 21:22:08 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.61 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61 % File : SYN101-1.002.002 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.20/0.61 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.20/0.61 % Problem : Plaisted problem n(t(2,2),2)
% 0.20/0.61 % Version : Biased.
% 0.20/0.61 % English :
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 % Refs : [Pla94] Plaisted (1994), The Search Efficiency of Theorem Prov
% 0.20/0.61 % Source : [Pla94]
% 0.20/0.61 % Names : N(T2n)) [Pla94]
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.20/0.61 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 17 RR)
% 0.20/0.61 % Number of literals : 37 ( 0 equ; 21 neg)
% 0.20/0.61 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg)
% 0.20/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.61 % Number of predicates : 8 ( 8 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.61 % Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.20/0.61 % Number of variables : 24 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.20/0.61 % SPC : CNF_UNS_EPR_NEQ_HRN
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 % Comments : Biased away from various calculi.
% 0.20/0.61 % : tptp2X: -f tptp -s2:2 SYN101-1.g
% 0.20/0.61 % Bugfixes : v1.2.0 - Bugfix in SYN086-1.
% 0.20/0.61 % : v1.2.1 - Bugfix in SYN086-1.
% 0.20/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(n_s2_goal_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.62 ~ p_1_2(a,a) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(n_s2_type11_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 ( p_1_2(X_1,X_2)
% 0.20/0.62 | ~ p_2_2(X_1,X_2)
% 0.20/0.62 | ~ p_1_1(X_1,X_2) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(n_s2_type11_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 ( p_1_2(X_1,X_2)
% 0.20/0.62 | ~ q_2_2(X_1,X_2)
% 0.20/0.62 | ~ q_1_1(X_1,X_2) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(n_s2_type12_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 ( q_1_2(X_1,X_2)
% 0.20/0.62 | ~ p_2_2(X_1,X_2)
% 0.20/0.62 | ~ q_1_1(X_1,X_2) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(n_s2_type12_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 ( q_1_2(X_1,X_2)
% 0.20/0.62 | ~ q_2_2(X_1,X_2)
% 0.20/0.62 | ~ p_1_1(X_1,X_2) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(n_s2_type21_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 ( p_1_1(X_1,X_2)
% 0.20/0.62 | ~ p_1_2(X_1,X_2) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(n_s2_type21_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 ( q_1_1(X_1,X_2)
% 0.20/0.62 | ~ q_1_2(X_1,X_2) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(n_s2_type22_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 ( p_2_2(X_1,X_2)
% 0.20/0.62 | ~ p_1_2(X_1,X_2) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(n_s2_type22_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 ( q_2_2(X_1,X_2)
% 0.20/0.62 | ~ q_1_2(X_1,X_2) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(n_t2_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 ( p_1_1(X_1,X_2)
% 0.20/0.62 | ~ nq_1(X_1)
% 0.20/0.62 | ~ nq_2(X_2) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(n_t2_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 ( q_1_1(X_1,X_2)
% 0.20/0.62 | ~ nq_1(X_1)
% 0.20/0.62 | ~ nq_2(X_2) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(n_t2_3,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 ( p_2_2(X_1,X_2)
% 0.20/0.62 | ~ nq_1(X_1)
% 0.20/0.62 | ~ nq_2(X_2) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(n_t2_4,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 ( q_2_2(X_1,X_2)
% 0.20/0.62 | ~ nq_1(X_1)
% 0.20/0.62 | ~ nq_2(X_2) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(n_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 nq_1(a) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(n_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 nq_1(b) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(n_3,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 nq_2(a) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(n_4,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 nq_2(b) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.62 %ClaNum:17(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.62 %VarNum:56(SingletonVarNum:24)
% 0.20/0.62 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.20/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.20/0.62 %SharedTerms:7
% 0.20/0.62 %goalClause: 5
% 0.20/0.62 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.20/0.62 [1]P1(a1)
% 0.20/0.62 [2]P1(a2)
% 0.20/0.62 [3]P2(a1)
% 0.20/0.62 [4]P2(a2)
% 0.20/0.62 [5]~P3(a1,a1)
% 0.20/0.62 [10]~P3(x101,x102)+P5(x101,x102)
% 0.20/0.62 [11]~P3(x111,x112)+P4(x111,x112)
% 0.20/0.62 [12]~P8(x121,x122)+P6(x121,x122)
% 0.20/0.62 [13]~P8(x131,x132)+P7(x131,x132)
% 0.20/0.62 [6]~P1(x61)+~P2(x62)+P5(x61,x62)
% 0.20/0.62 [7]~P1(x71)+~P2(x72)+P4(x71,x72)
% 0.20/0.62 [8]~P1(x81)+~P2(x82)+P6(x81,x82)
% 0.20/0.62 [9]~P1(x91)+~P2(x92)+P7(x91,x92)
% 0.20/0.62 [14]~P5(x141,x142)+~P4(x141,x142)+P3(x141,x142)
% 0.20/0.62 [15]~P6(x151,x152)+~P7(x151,x152)+P3(x151,x152)
% 0.20/0.62 [16]~P5(x161,x162)+~P7(x161,x162)+P8(x161,x162)
% 0.20/0.62 [17]~P4(x171,x172)+~P6(x171,x172)+P8(x171,x172)
% 0.20/0.62 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(19,plain,
% 0.20/0.62 (P7(a1,a1)),
% 0.20/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[5,1,3,15,9])).
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(27,plain,
% 0.20/0.62 (~P7(a1,a1)),
% 0.20/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[5,1,3,15,9,8,7,6,12,16,14])).
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(28,plain,
% 0.20/0.62 ($false),
% 0.20/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[27,19]),
% 0.20/0.62 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.62 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------