TSTP Solution File: SYN101-1.002.002 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SYN101-1.002.002 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:09:37 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.93s 1.74s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (   8 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   41 (  23   ~;  18   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   14 (   8   >;   6   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (;  14   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ q_2_2 > q_1_2 > q_1_1 > p_2_2 > p_1_2 > p_1_1 > nq_2 > nq_1 > #nlpp > b > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(p_1_1,type,
    p_1_1: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(p_1_2,type,
    p_1_2: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(nq_2,type,
    nq_2: $i > $o ).

tff(p_2_2,type,
    p_2_2: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(q_1_2,type,
    q_1_2: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(q_1_1,type,
    q_1_1: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(q_2_2,type,
    q_2_2: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(nq_1,type,
    nq_1: $i > $o ).

tff(f_111,axiom,
    nq_1(a),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_113,axiom,
    nq_2(a),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_86,axiom,
    ! [X_1,X_2] :
      ( p_1_1(X_1,X_2)
      | ~ nq_1(X_1)
      | ~ nq_2(X_2) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_102,axiom,
    ! [X_1,X_2] :
      ( p_2_2(X_1,X_2)
      | ~ nq_1(X_1)
      | ~ nq_2(X_2) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_34,axiom,
    ! [X_1,X_2] :
      ( p_1_2(X_1,X_2)
      | ~ p_2_2(X_1,X_2)
      | ~ p_1_1(X_1,X_2) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_26,axiom,
    ~ p_1_2(a,a),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    nq_1(a),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_111]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    nq_2(a),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_113]) ).

tff(c_20,plain,
    ! [X_2_18,X_1_17] :
      ( ~ nq_2(X_2_18)
      | ~ nq_1(X_1_17)
      | p_1_1(X_1_17,X_2_18) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_86]) ).

tff(c_24,plain,
    ! [X_2_22,X_1_21] :
      ( ~ nq_2(X_2_22)
      | ~ nq_1(X_1_21)
      | p_2_2(X_1_21,X_2_22) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_102]) ).

tff(c_52,plain,
    ! [X_1_43,X_2_44] :
      ( ~ p_1_1(X_1_43,X_2_44)
      | ~ p_2_2(X_1_43,X_2_44)
      | p_1_2(X_1_43,X_2_44) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_34]) ).

tff(c_85,plain,
    ! [X_1_53,X_2_54] :
      ( ~ p_1_1(X_1_53,X_2_54)
      | p_1_2(X_1_53,X_2_54)
      | ~ nq_2(X_2_54)
      | ~ nq_1(X_1_53) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_52]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ~ p_1_2(a,a),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_26]) ).

tff(c_91,plain,
    ( ~ p_1_1(a,a)
    | ~ nq_2(a)
    | ~ nq_1(a) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_85,c_2]) ).

tff(c_95,plain,
    ~ p_1_1(a,a),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_28,c_32,c_91]) ).

tff(c_98,plain,
    ( ~ nq_2(a)
    | ~ nq_1(a) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_95]) ).

tff(c_102,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_28,c_32,c_98]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SYN101-1.002.002 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:27:11 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.93/1.74  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.93/1.74  
% 2.93/1.74  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.93/1.77  
% 2.93/1.77  Inference rules
% 2.93/1.77  ----------------------
% 2.93/1.77  #Ref     : 0
% 2.93/1.77  #Sup     : 12
% 2.93/1.77  #Fact    : 0
% 2.93/1.77  #Define  : 0
% 2.93/1.77  #Split   : 0
% 2.93/1.77  #Chain   : 0
% 2.93/1.77  #Close   : 0
% 2.93/1.77  
% 2.93/1.77  Ordering : KBO
% 2.93/1.77  
% 2.93/1.77  Simplification rules
% 2.93/1.77  ----------------------
% 2.93/1.77  #Subsume      : 1
% 2.93/1.77  #Demod        : 4
% 2.93/1.77  #Tautology    : 3
% 2.93/1.77  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 2.93/1.77  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.93/1.77  
% 2.93/1.77  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.93/1.77  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.93/1.77  
% 2.93/1.77  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.93/1.77  ----------------------
% 2.93/1.77  Preprocessing        : 0.44
% 2.93/1.77  Parsing              : 0.24
% 2.93/1.77  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 2.93/1.77  Main loop            : 0.25
% 2.93/1.77  Inferencing          : 0.11
% 2.93/1.77  Reduction            : 0.06
% 2.93/1.77  Demodulation         : 0.04
% 2.93/1.77  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 2.93/1.77  Subsumption          : 0.05
% 2.93/1.77  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 2.93/1.77  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.93/1.77  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.93/1.77  Total                : 0.74
% 2.93/1.77  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.93/1.77  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.93/1.77  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.93/1.77  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------