TSTP Solution File: SYN099-1.003 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN099-1.003 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:29:17 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 36 ( 0 equ; 20 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(m_s2_type11_3,axiom,
( p_1_3(X1)
| ~ p_2_3(X1)
| ~ p_1_2(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.11rQ254SOV/E---3.1_6911.p',m_s2_type11_3) ).
cnf(m_s2_goal_1,negated_conjecture,
~ p_1_3(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.11rQ254SOV/E---3.1_6911.p',m_s2_goal_1) ).
cnf(m_s2_type11_5,axiom,
( p_2_3(X1)
| ~ p_3_3(X1)
| ~ p_2_2(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.11rQ254SOV/E---3.1_6911.p',m_s2_type11_5) ).
cnf(m_s2_type22_1,axiom,
( p_2_2(X1)
| ~ p_1_2(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.11rQ254SOV/E---3.1_6911.p',m_s2_type22_1) ).
cnf(m_s2_type11_1,axiom,
( p_1_2(X1)
| ~ p_2_2(X1)
| ~ p_1_1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.11rQ254SOV/E---3.1_6911.p',m_s2_type11_1) ).
cnf(m_t2_1,axiom,
p_1_1(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.11rQ254SOV/E---3.1_6911.p',m_t2_1) ).
cnf(m_t2_3,axiom,
p_2_2(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.11rQ254SOV/E---3.1_6911.p',m_t2_3) ).
cnf(m_t2_5,axiom,
p_3_3(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.11rQ254SOV/E---3.1_6911.p',m_t2_5) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( p_1_3(X1)
| ~ p_2_3(X1)
| ~ p_1_2(X1) ),
m_s2_type11_3 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ p_1_3(X1),
m_s2_goal_1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ p_2_3(X1)
| ~ p_1_2(X1) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( p_2_3(X1)
| ~ p_3_3(X1)
| ~ p_2_2(X1) ),
m_s2_type11_5 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
( p_2_2(X1)
| ~ p_1_2(X1) ),
m_s2_type22_1 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
( p_1_2(X1)
| ~ p_2_2(X1)
| ~ p_1_1(X1) ),
m_s2_type11_1 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
p_1_1(a),
m_t2_1 ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
p_2_2(a),
m_t2_3 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ p_3_3(X1)
| ~ p_1_2(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
p_3_3(a),
m_t2_5 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
p_1_2(a),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SYN099-1.003 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 19:02:37 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.11rQ254SOV/E---3.1_6911.p
% 0.19/0.48 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # new_bool_3 with pid 7014 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.48 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 7017 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.48 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 50
% 0.19/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 27
% 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses : 23
% 0.19/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 23
% 0.19/0.48 # Processed clauses : 48
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 47
% 0.19/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Generated clauses : 15
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8
% 0.19/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Paramodulations : 15
% 0.19/0.48 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 9
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 24
% 0.19/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.19/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 15
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.19/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 18
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 23
% 0.19/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 146
% 0.19/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 137
% 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 757
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1648 pages
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.19/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------