TSTP Solution File: SYN098-1.002 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN098-1.002 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:10:03 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.50s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN098-1.002 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 21:52:15 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n013.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36 Mon Jul 11 21:52:15 2022
% 0.13/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 28125.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=1, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 The clause set is propositional; the strategy will be
% 0.13/0.36 ordered hyperresolution with the propositional
% 0.13/0.36 optimizations, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(propositional).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(sort_literals).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 63
% 0.19/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 68
% 0.19/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 92
% 0.19/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 54
% 0.19/0.40 distinct predicate count: 0
% 0.19/0.40 distinct function count: 0
% 0.19/0.40 distinct constant count: 54
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.19/0.50 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.50 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 3 [ 1 1 73 ] (0.00 seconds, 100 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 4 [ 2 1 155 ] (0.00 seconds, 258 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 5 [ 2 0 108 ] (0.00 seconds, 150 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 6 [ 4 1 78 ] (0.00 seconds, 217 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 7 [ 3 0 179 ] (0.00 seconds, 265 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 8 [ 4 1 73 ] (0.00 seconds, 210 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 9 [ 5 0 120 ] (0.00 seconds, 202 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 10 [ 6 0 76 ] (0.00 seconds, 240 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 11 [ 6 1 123 ] (0.00 seconds, 195 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 12 [ 6 0 75 ] (0.00 seconds, 245 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 13 [ 6 1 152 ] (0.00 seconds, 279 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 14 [ 6 0 190 ] (0.00 seconds, 253 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 15 [ 6 1 277 ] (0.00 seconds, 359 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 16 [ 6 0 250 ] (0.00 seconds, 345 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 17 [ 8 1 197 ] (0.00 seconds, 244 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 18 [ 8 0 125 ] (0.00 seconds, 174 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 19 [ 9 1 220 ] (0.00 seconds, 332 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.11 sec ----> 142 [binary,141.1,3.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Length of proof is 23. Level of proof is 7.
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.19/0.50 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.50 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 1 [] {-} u_1| -p_0| -q_0.
% 0.19/0.50 2 [copy,1,propositional] {+} -p_0| -q_0|u_1.
% 0.19/0.50 3 [] {+} -u_1.
% 0.19/0.50 8 [] {-} u_3|p_0| -q_1| -q_2.
% 0.19/0.50 9 [copy,8,propositional] {+} -q_1| -q_2|p_0|u_3.
% 0.19/0.50 10 [] {-} p_0| -u_3.
% 0.19/0.50 11 [copy,10,propositional] {+} -u_3|p_0.
% 0.19/0.50 24 [] {-} u_7|q_0| -q_1| -p_2.
% 0.19/0.50 25 [copy,24,propositional] {+} -p_2| -q_1|q_0|u_7.
% 0.19/0.50 26 [] {-} q_0| -u_7.
% 0.19/0.50 27 [copy,26,propositional] {+} -u_7|q_0.
% 0.19/0.50 32 [] {-} u_9|q_1| -q_2| -p_3.
% 0.19/0.50 33 [copy,32,propositional] {+} -q_2| -p_3|q_1|u_9.
% 0.19/0.50 34 [] {-} q_1| -u_9.
% 0.19/0.50 35 [copy,34,propositional] {+} -u_9|q_1.
% 0.19/0.50 52 [] {-} p_2| -u_14.
% 0.19/0.50 53 [copy,52,propositional] {+} -u_14|p_2.
% 0.19/0.50 54 [] {-} p_3| -u_15.
% 0.19/0.50 55 [copy,54,propositional] {+} -u_15|p_3.
% 0.19/0.50 56 [] {-} q_2| -u_16.
% 0.19/0.50 57 [copy,56,propositional] {+} -u_16|q_2.
% 0.19/0.50 107 [] {-} u_14|p_2.
% 0.19/0.50 108 [copy,107,propositional] {+} p_2|u_14.
% 0.19/0.50 109 [] {-} u_15|p_3.
% 0.19/0.50 110 [copy,109,propositional] {+} p_3|u_15.
% 0.19/0.50 111 [] {-} u_16|q_2.
% 0.19/0.50 112 [copy,111,propositional] {+} q_2|u_16.
% 0.19/0.50 116 [hyper,108,53] {+} p_2.
% 0.19/0.50 118 [hyper,112,57] {+} q_2.
% 0.19/0.50 119 [hyper,110,55] {+} p_3.
% 0.19/0.50 123 [hyper,119,33,118] {+} q_1|u_9.
% 0.19/0.50 130 [hyper,123,35] {+} q_1.
% 0.19/0.50 134 [hyper,130,25,116] {+} q_0|u_7.
% 0.19/0.50 135 [hyper,130,9,118] {+} p_0|u_3.
% 0.19/0.50 137 [hyper,134,27] {+} q_0.
% 0.19/0.50 140 [hyper,135,11] {+} p_0.
% 0.19/0.50 141 [hyper,140,2,137] {-} u_1.
% 0.19/0.50 142 [binary,141.1,3.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.50 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 ============ end of search ============
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 true clauses given 3 (12.5%)
% 0.19/0.50 false clauses given 21
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 FALSE TRUE
% 0.19/0.50 1 0 1
% 0.19/0.50 3 1 2
% 0.19/0.50 tot: 1 3 (75.0% true)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 19 [ 9 1 220 ] (0.00 seconds, 332 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Process 28125 finished Mon Jul 11 21:52:15 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------