TSTP Solution File: SYN097-1.002 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN097-1.002 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:10:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.48s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN097-1.002 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 09:10:28 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.36 Tue Jul 12 09:10:28 2022
% 0.14/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 24075.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=1, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 The clause set is propositional; the strategy will be
% 0.14/0.36 ordered hyperresolution with the propositional
% 0.14/0.36 optimizations, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(propositional).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(sort_literals).
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 47
% 0.20/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 52
% 0.20/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 90
% 0.20/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.20/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 38
% 0.20/0.40 distinct predicate count: 0
% 0.20/0.40 distinct function count: 0
% 0.20/0.40 distinct constant count: 38
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.20/0.48 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.48 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 Model 3 [ 2 1 107 ] (0.00 seconds, 125 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 Model 4 [ 3 1 46 ] (0.00 seconds, 96 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 Model 5 [ 3 0 120 ] (0.00 seconds, 138 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 Model 6 [ 3 1 109 ] (0.00 seconds, 127 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 Model 7 [ 4 0 47 ] (0.00 seconds, 96 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 Model 8 [ 4 1 76 ] (0.00 seconds, 94 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.08 sec ----> 109 [binary,108.1,3.1] {-} $F.
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 Length of proof is 12. Level of proof is 5.
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.20/0.48 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.48 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 1 [] {-} u_1| -p_1_2.
% 0.20/0.48 2 [copy,1,propositional] {+} -p_1_2|u_1.
% 0.20/0.48 3 [] {+} -u_1.
% 0.20/0.48 4 [] {-} u_2|p_1_2| -p_2_2| -p_1_1.
% 0.20/0.48 5 [copy,4,propositional] {+} -p_2_2| -p_1_1|p_1_2|u_2.
% 0.20/0.48 6 [] {-} p_1_2| -u_2.
% 0.20/0.48 7 [copy,6,propositional] {+} -u_2|p_1_2.
% 0.20/0.48 36 [] {-} p_1_1| -u_10.
% 0.20/0.48 37 [copy,36,propositional] {+} -u_10|p_1_1.
% 0.20/0.48 40 [] {-} p_2_2| -u_12.
% 0.20/0.48 41 [copy,40,propositional] {+} -u_12|p_2_2.
% 0.20/0.48 80 [] {-} u_10|p_1_1.
% 0.20/0.48 81 [copy,80,propositional] {+} p_1_1|u_10.
% 0.20/0.48 84 [] {-} u_12|p_2_2.
% 0.20/0.48 85 [copy,84,propositional] {+} p_2_2|u_12.
% 0.20/0.48 89 [hyper,81,37] {+} p_1_1.
% 0.20/0.48 95 [hyper,85,41] {+} p_2_2.
% 0.20/0.48 98 [hyper,95,5,89] {-} p_1_2|u_2.
% 0.20/0.48 107 [hyper,98,7] {-} p_1_2.
% 0.20/0.48 108 [hyper,107,2] {-} u_1.
% 0.20/0.48 109 [binary,108.1,3.1] {-} $F.
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.48 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 ============ end of search ============
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 true clauses given 3 (16.7%)
% 0.20/0.48 false clauses given 15
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 FALSE TRUE
% 0.20/0.48 2 2 2
% 0.20/0.48 tot: 2 2 (50.0% true)
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 Model 8 [ 4 -2 76 ] (0.00 seconds, 94 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 Process 24075 finished Tue Jul 12 09:10:28 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------