TSTP Solution File: SYN097-1.002 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SYN097-1.002 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:16:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.71s 1.01s
% Output : Refutation 0.71s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SYN097-1.002 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 09:10:59 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.71/1.01 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.71/1.01 Process 31843 was started by sandbox on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.71/1.01 Tue Jul 12 09:11:00 2022
% 0.71/1.01 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_31519_n018.cluster.edu".
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_31519_n018.cluster.edu
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.71/1.01 set(auto2).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.71/1.01 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.71/1.01 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.71/1.01 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.71/1.01 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.71/1.01 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.71/1.01 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.71/1.01 clear(print_given).
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (52 formulas)
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.71/1.01 Function symbol KB weights:
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 % Starting search at 0.02 seconds.
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.71/1.01 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.71/1.01 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.71/1.01 % Length of proof is 15.
% 0.71/1.01 % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.71/1.01 % Maximum clause weight is 2.000.
% 0.71/1.01 % Given clauses 20.
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 2 u_10 | p_1_1 # label(u_t2_1) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.71/1.01 4 u_12 | p_2_2 # label(u_t2_3) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.71/1.01 6 -u_1 # label(u_1_s2_goal_1) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.71/1.01 11 u_1 | -p_1_2 # label(u_s2_goal_1) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.71/1.01 12 -p_1_2. [copy(11),unit_del(a,6)].
% 0.71/1.01 13 p_1_2 | -u_2 # label(u_2_s2_type11_1) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.71/1.01 14 -u_2. [copy(13),unit_del(a,12)].
% 0.71/1.01 23 p_1_1 | -u_10 # label(u_10_t2_1) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.71/1.01 25 p_2_2 | -u_12 # label(u_12_t2_3) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.71/1.01 47 u_2 | p_1_2 | -p_2_2 | -p_1_1 # label(u_s2_type11_1) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.71/1.01 48 -p_2_2 | -p_1_1. [copy(47),unit_del(a,14),unit_del(b,12)].
% 0.71/1.01 59 p_1_1. [resolve(23,b,2,a),merge(b)].
% 0.71/1.01 61 -p_2_2. [back_unit_del(48),unit_del(b,59)].
% 0.71/1.01 62 -u_12. [back_unit_del(25),unit_del(a,61)].
% 0.71/1.01 64 $F. [back_unit_del(4),unit_del(a,62),unit_del(b,61)].
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 Given=20. Generated=58. Kept=53. proofs=1.
% 0.71/1.01 Usable=15. Sos=26. Demods=0. Limbo=3, Disabled=61. Hints=0.
% 0.71/1.01 Megabytes=0.08.
% 0.71/1.01 User_CPU=0.02, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.71/1.01 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 Process 31843 exit (max_proofs) Tue Jul 12 09:11:00 2022
% 0.71/1.01 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------