%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem  : SYN097-1.002 : TPTP v3.4.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : add_equality:r
% Format   : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command  : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 unknown
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 1000MB
% OS       : Linux 2.4.22-21mdk-i686-up-4GB
% CPULimit : 600s

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.0s
% Output   : Assurance 0.0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/SYN/SYN097-1.002+noeq.in
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
% 
% prove-all-passes started
% 
% detected problem class: nne
% detected subclass: medium
% 
% strategies selected: 
% (hyper 27 #f 1 7)
% (binary-unit 10 #f 1 7)
% (binary-double 16 #f 1 7)
% (binary 54 #t 1 7)
% (binary-order 27 #f 1 7)
% (binary-posweight-order 125 #f)
% (binary-order-sos 54 #t)
% (binary-unit-uniteq 27 #f)
% (binary-weightorder 54 #f)
% (binary-order 54 #f)
% (hyper-order 43 #f)
% (binary 109 #t)
% 
% 
% SOS clause 
% u_1(0) | -p_1_2(0).
% was split for some strategies as: 
% u_1(0).
% -p_1_2(0).
% 
% ********* EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED *********
% 
% 
% timer checkpoints: c(52,40,0,104,0,0)
% 
% 
% START OF PROOF
% 53 [] -u_1(0).
% 54 [] -p_1_1(0) | -p_2_2(0) | p_1_2(0) | u_2(0).
% 55 [] -u_2(0) | p_1_2(0).
% 70 [?] ?
% 71 [] -u_10(0) | p_1_1(0).
% 74 [?] ?
% 75 [] -u_12(0) | p_2_2(0).
% 104 [] -p_1_2(0) | u_1(0).
% 123 [input:70,binarycut:71] p_1_1(0).
% 144 [input:74,binarycut:75] p_2_2(0).
% 147 [hyper:54,144,123,binarycut:55] p_1_2(0).
% 153 [hyper:104,147,cut:53] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
% 
% Proof found by the following strategy:
% 
% using hyperresolution
% not using sos strategy
% using positive unit paramodulation strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% clause length limited to 7
% clause depth limited to 1
% seconds given: 9
% 
% 
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
% 
% Global statistics over all passes: 
% 
%  given clauses:    23
%  derived clauses:   43
%  kept clauses:      7
%  kept size sum:     18
%  kept mid-nuclei:   16
%  kept new demods:   0
%  forw unit-subs:    2
%  forw double-subs: 0
%  forw overdouble-subs: 0
%  backward subs:     21
%  fast unit cutoff:  4
%  full unit cutoff:  0
%  dbl  unit cutoff:  8
%  real runtime:  0.0
%  process. runtime:  0.0
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics: 
%  tried:           0
%  length fails:    0
%  strength fails:  0
%  predlist fails:  0
%  aux str. fails:  0
%  by-lit fails:    0
%  full subs tried: 0
%  full subs fail:  0
% 
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/SYN/SYN097-1.002+noeq.in")
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------